Channel
@Horriblygood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
319subscribers
-55,648 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001834414044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Horriblygood |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Horriblygood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 319 | -55,561 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 55,880 | -87 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 55,967 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 55,967 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 117,037 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Horriblygood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
— حاجیآقا / صادق هدایت داستانی طنز و انتقادی دربارهی آدمی که برای پول و موقعیتش، حاضر است با هر شرایطی کنار بیاید. «حاجیآقا» مردی ثروتمند و منفعتطلب است که همیشه سعی میکند جایگاه و منافع خودش را حفظ کند. او برای رسیدن به هدفش، با آدمها و شرایط مختلف همراه میشود و چندان به اصول و عقایدش پایبند نیست. — دریافت کتاب
«به همان اندازه که انسانیت صنعتیتر و پرصداتر میشود به همان اندازه آرامش روحی خود را از دست میدهد.» ابله، داستایفسکی - دریافت کتاب
— نان و شراب / سیلونه داستان رژیمی که حق آزادی رو از مردم گرفته. این اثر راجع به ظهور فاشیسم در ایتالیا هست و از رژیمی صحبت میکند که با زورگویی و دروغ، حق آزادی رو از مردم گرفته. داستان مردی است که در دل خفقان و سرکوب، برای حفظ انسانیت و باورهایش میجنگد. رمانی که سیاست را نه از پشت تریبونها، بلکه از زندگی مردم عادی، فقر، عشق، ترس و امید روایت میکند. — دریافت کتاب
«من به خدا اعتقاد دارم، اما نمیتوانم جهان او را بپذیرم. نمیتوانم برای رنج کودکان بخشش بطلبم. چه چیزی میتواند رنج یک کودک بیگناه را توجیه کند؟ و اگر همهی حقیقت در این باشد که این رنجها برای نجات انسان لازم است، من پیشاپیش اعلام میکنم که این حقیقت را نمیپذیرم.» برادران کارامازوف، داستایفسکی - دریافت کتاب
از هیجانانگیزترین کتابهای ژانر معمایی:
— زمان اشتباه، مکان اشتباه / جیلیان مکآلیستر قتلی که همه چیز رو تغییر میده. در شبی که همهچیز عادی به نظر میرسد، «جن» با وحشت میبیند که پسرش مرتکب قتلی هولناک میشود. اما صبح روز بعد، او یک روز به گذشته برمیگردد. این اتفاق بارها تکرار میشود و جن، با سفر به گذشته، تلاش میکند راز این جنایت را کشف کند و پیش از آنکه دیر شود، آینده را تغییر دهد. — دریافت کتاب
«آدمیکه هدفی در آینده نمیدید ناچار خود را با افکار گذشته مشغول میکرد و این باعث سقوط او میشد.» انسان در جستوجوی معنا، فرانکل - دریافت کتاب
— چه کسی از ویرجینیا وولف میترسد؟ / ادوارد آلبی شبی که قرار بود یک دورهمی ساده باشد اما رازهای پنهان را اشکار میکند. داستان دربارهی جرج و مارتا، زوجی میانسال، است که پس از یک مهمانی دانشگاهی، زوجی جوان را به خانهشان دعوت میکنند. اما با گذشت شب، گفتوگوهای معمولی جای خود را به بازیهای روانی، افشاگریها و درگیریهای تلخ میدهد و رازهایی آشکار میشوند که زندگی همهی آنها را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد. — دریافت کت…
«گیاهان برای اینکه زنده بمونن، باید به طریق صحیح دوست داشته بشن. آدمام همینطور. ما از لحظهٔ تولد، به پدر و مادرمون متکی هستیم که دوستمون داشته باشن و زنده نگهمون دارن و اگر اونا محبت رو از طریق صحیح به ما نشون بدن، ما انسانهای بهتری میشیم» ما تمامش میکنیم، کالین هوور - دریافت کتاب
— چاقوی شکاری / هاروکی موراکامی مجموعهای از داستانهای کوتاه هاروکی. فضای داستانها را طوری روایت میکند که خواننده بهسادگی خودش را بهجای شخصیتها میگذارد؛ از جمله در داستان محوری «چاقوی شکاری» که با جملهای تکاندهنده آغاز میشود: «چاقوی تیزی به نرمهٔ سرم فرو رفته؛ همانجا که خاطرات هستند...» و از تراژدی تروماهای حلنشده و ناتوانی انسان در رهایی از گذشته میگوید. — دریافت کتاب
«من ماه های بسیار طاقت فرسا و پرفشاری را از سر گذرانده ام تا از لحاظ روانی فرسوده نشوم. چیزهایی که معمولا به راحتی تابشان می آورم الان از تحملم خارج است. مهم نیست؛ این هم خواهد گذشت.» خطاب به عشق، آلبر کامو - دریافت کتاب
— کلکسیونر / جان فاولز. رمان ترسناک و روانشناختی «کلکسیونر» اثر جان فاولز، داستانی دلهرهآور درباره مردی ثروتمند و منزوی است که شیفتهی زن جوانی به نام میراندا میشود. او میراندا را میرباید و در خونه خود حبس میکند. — دریافت کتاب
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Horriblygood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@Horriblygood edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 143,134 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لینک شیوان” (@Horriblygood), 319 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Horriblygood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.