Channel
@falerozhi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76,564subscribers
+13,365 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001357738561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @falerozhi |
| Description | @falerozhii |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/falerozhi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 76,564 | -894 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 77,458 | -666 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 78,124 | +4,131 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 73,993 | +3,314 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 70,679 | +7,221 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 63,458 | -431 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 63,889 | +828 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 63,061 | -188 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 63,249 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 63,253 | +37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 63,216 | +23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 63,193 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 63,199 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 63,199 | first reading |
218 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 212 of 213 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 218 (4 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,030,704 |
| Reactions total | 22,586 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21,708 reactions across 200 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,917 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 7,494 | 34.5% | |
| 💯 | 805 | 3.71% | |
| 🎉 | 683 | 3.15% | |
| 🔥 | 678 | 3.12% | |
| 🍓 | 562 | 2.59% | |
| 👌 | 493 | 2.27% | |
| ⚡ | 76 | 0.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 212 of the 218 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,586reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من وارد زندگیات نشدم که فقط دوستت داشته باشم؛ آمده بودم به تو یاد بدهم عشق یعنی چه... افسوس که خودم، تاوان نفهمیدن تو را پس دادم. من با تمام قلبم آمدم سمتت... با دستی پر از عشق، با دلی که بلد نبود نصفه دوستت داشته باشد. آمدم تا جایی که بلد بودم کنارت بمانم، هوایت را داشته باشم، بفهممت، حتی وقتهایی که خودت از خودت خسته بودی. من برایت فقط یک آدم نبودم... من تمام احساسی بودم که شاید قبل از من هیچوقت تجربهاش نکرده بو…
❤17⚡1💯1🔥1
فال فصل 🍀🌞🍁❄️ فقط اتفاقات یک فصل از سال (به درخواست شما) تعبیر میشود. پاسخ با ويس میباشد. قيمت اين فال⬅️ 360 فوری 500 @falerozhii
❤11👌1💯1🔥1
کارت 2ریکت بزن👍 چیزی که اینجا میبینم اول از همه يك ناراحتی زیاد همراه با اعصاب خوردی و میشه گفت دلشکستگی. بسته به مدت و عمق ارتباط این ناراحتی میتونه عمیق تر باشه. انگار این شخص با یه حرکتی یا يك حرفی زخمی روی روح یا قلب شما گذاشته باشه. و شما در حال حاضر خیلی مصمم و قوی ایستادید و علی رغم هر اتفاقی که افتاده بینتون، خودتون رو نباختید و حد و مرز مشخصی توی ذهنتون هست که وقتی این شخص برگشت باهاش بگذارید، یا يك تصمیم ق…
👍18❤6💯1🔥1
کارت 1❤️ ریکت بزن شاید براتون عجیب باشه شایدم هم نه اما انرژی دوست داشتن و علاقه اینجا وجود داره با وجود سکوت یا بی خبری ای که از سمت پارتنر/ شخص مورد نظرتون دارید. برای خیلی هاتون این ارتباط تازه بوده و در عین خوبی یکهو همه چی بر عکس بشه یا بهم بریزه و شخص مورد نظر سرد بشه و شروع به فاصله گرفتن بکنه. علت این رفتار یهویی یا سکوت بهم ریختگی درونی و روحی و ذهنی این شخص هست که ناشی از مشکلات زندگی شخصی اش هست. انگار که …
❤32👍2⚡1💯1
خانوم مرادی چرا یهو غیب شد چرا ساکت شد؟؟ نیت کنید کارت 1❤️ کارت 2👍 @falerozhii
❤99👍73👌2💯1
فال کلی قهوه🧿🔮 برای گرفتنِ انرژیِ فال ریکت بزنید ایدی جهت گرفتن فال شخصی @falerozhii
❤68🍓13👍6🔥6💯1
@falerozhi pinned Deleted message
رضایت پکیج احساسی رضایت شما اعتبار کار منه @falerozhii
👍40🎉38💯35🔥35❤28👌2🍓1
یادمە صبحا چون یکم من زودتر بیدار میشدم همیشە صبح بخیرو من میگفتم باکلی انرژی با کلی عشق تو اینستا براش پست میفرستادم تو تلگرام عکس و اهنگ وقتی بیدار میشد یە عالمە پیام داشت ازم جواب صبح بخیرمو میداد و زنگ میزد بهم میدونست کە دوس دارم صدای اول صبحش کە بم و گرفتەس بشنوم اگە یە روز صبح صداش یکم تغیر میکرد قهر میکردم میگفتم چرا با صدات صحبت کردیییی قبل اینکە من بشنوممم حالا هی قسم میخورد بخدا حرف نزدمممم فقط آب خوردممم…
❤82🔥45👍41💯40🎉31⚡1🍓1
اسفند کارمای تو:🐠 دنیا اون قدر بهت زخم زده که کم کم زندگی کردن توی ذهنت شروع شد. حقیقت اون قدر تیز بود که فرار کردی به خواب، خیال، رویاهایی که هیچ جا وجود ندارن الان هم نیمه ای از خودت حضور داره توی زندگی واقعی. درس تو:🌸 می تونی همه چی رو حس کنی و بازم زنده بمونی. حساسیتت یه نفرین نیست. یه قدرت فوق العادهست که پشتش درد قایم شده. دست بردار از بی حس کردن خودت. این حس ها نمی کشن، فرار ازشون می کشه. هدیه تو:🌕 تو دردت…
🔥48💯45❤43🎉39👍32🍓3⚡2👌1
بهمن🐙 کارمای تو: تو آدمهایی رو دوست داری که به همون اندازه دوستت ندارن. همهچی رو میدی و اسمش رو عشق میذاری، در حالی که داری از خودت محافظت نمیکنی. الان خالی، دلخور و هنوز هم در حال دادنی. درس تو:🌕 آب دادن به گلهای مرده رو متوقف کن. عشقت درمان زخم دیگران نیست. همه لیاقت مهربونی تو رو ندارن. مرز گذاشتن تو رو سرد نمیکنه، تو رو سالم نگه میداره. هدیه تو:🌸 وقتی کسی رو دوست داری، اون رو تو عمق وجودش حس میکنی. شهو…
👍47❤44🔥36🎉33💯32👌2⚡1
دی🐐 کارمای تو: مدت زیادی جنگیدی و یادت رفته آرامش چطور حس میشه. هر مکالمه برات یه رقابته. هر احساسی یه نقطه ضعفه برای شکست خوردن. تو داری نبردهایی رو میبری که هیچکس ازت نخواسته. درس تو:🌕 همهچیز جنگ نیست. گاهی شجاعترین کار این هست که شمشیر را زمین بگذاری. مهربانی با کسی تو را ضعیف نمیکند، انسانی ترت میکند. دست از جنگیدن با آدمهایی بردار که فقط میخواهند دوستت داشته باشند. هدیه تو:🌸 شجاعتت ترسناک و مسری است. …
❤42👍41💯39🔥39🎉31🍓3⚡1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 218 posts we hold for @falerozhi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 29,790 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@falerozhi” (@falerozhi), 76,564 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falerozhi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.