دخترای داستایفسکی

Channel
𝐍𝐠𝐚𝐫ִֶָ ☽︎۪ ࣪
@The_Ngar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,419subscribers
-519 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610482052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Ngar |
| Description | ︲ ᨳ همان پروانهِ کوچک🦋 𝖠𝗅𝗅 𝖠𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗆𝖾 ₊ @NgarsHome ★ @CherryBlossomTalk_Bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Ngar |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 22,419 | -68 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:05 | 22,487 | -55 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:18 | 22,542 | -52 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 22,594 | -60 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:15 | 22,654 | -60 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:39 | 22,714 | -39 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:39 | 22,753 | -41 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 22,794 | -48 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:50 | 22,842 | -37 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 22,879 | -43 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 22,922 | -91 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 23,013 | -59 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 23,072 | -39 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 23,111 | +208 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 22,903 | +22,876 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 27 | -22,444 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 22,471 | +119 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 22,352 | +57 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 22,295 | +470 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 21,825 | first reading |
Engagement
314 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 22,419 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,320
- 71 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 71
- of 314 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 314 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 164,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈932
- Videos
- ≈182
- Links
- ≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 15s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (1.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Sticker, posted without a caption
ارتباط گرفتن با من واقعا سخته، نه چون آدم سردیام، نه چون اجتماعی نیستم، فقط یه حصار نامرئی همیشه دورمه. میتونم ساعتها باهات حرف بزنم، بخندم، معاشرت کنم، حتی درباره عمیق ترین چیزها حرف بزنم ولی اون بخش از من که واقعا خود منه رو تقریباً هیچکس نميبينه.
─ کتابِ رویای یک نیمه شب تابستانی🌀
حس زندگیمیده پستهاش
واقعا چقدر جملهی “غير ضروری بدجنسید” پر محتوا و پر مفهومه، واقعا چه لزومی به اینقدر بدی کردن هست؟
حس زندگیمیده پستهاش
حس زندگیمیده پستهاش
حس زندگیمیده پستهاش
حس زندگیمیده پستهاش
اینجا برای من حس زندگی میده،عکس هاش پر از احساسن🌀
هرچقدر با خودم میگم اون لحظاتی که میوفتم توی یک باتلاق پر از احساس بدبختی هم با ارزشن چون لااقل باعث میشن شادیهام بیشتر به چشمم بیان، فایده نداره و از دردشون کم نمیشه
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @The_Ngar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@The_Ngar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @The_Ngar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 22 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@astroxdaily · 21,87116 postsPOV
@samepov · 51,8233 postsرقص پروانه
@MyButterfly_Dance · 182 postsAquaX Club🌀🌊
@coachreyyyyy · 752 postsNalu
@emmwitha · 662 posts𝓜ari‘s Daily
@parkmrn · 3562 posts𓏲⋆ ๋ دنیای کوچیک آریتی ⋆ִֶָ
@smallWorld010 · 1872 postsÉchos du Cœur
@tmtylm_eiyd · 452 postsهمین فَــــࢪدا دوبٰاࢪه
@tomoag · 1242 postsLE SSERAFIM𒈒ᯓ𖥔
@LESSERAFIMIR5 · 2,0441 postAbout K”
@liifesun · 581 post𝑼𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒍🦋
@oncallfrin · 741 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Nargeswithani · 41410 postsׅ ֹ 🪭 ໋𝒞riׅmson ֹ ᜔°꩜🧣
@lilyofthevalle_yy · 1146 postsکتابخانهیعجیب
@itsdarkor · 1,4664 posts Kissed by Sun 🔒
@sw1un · 5842 posts⊹ ࣪ ˖ About Atriya ⊹
@About_Atriya · 1,4021 postرقص پروانه
@MyButterfly_Dance · 181 postیونـگبـوك ؛ سۄم اٰکتبـر
@Petallwaves · 2801 postㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ۫ ࣪ 𓏲 𝖥𝖺𝗂𝗋𝗒
@TheFairyGirl · 4,3431 postAquaX Club🌀🌊
@coachreyyyyy · 751 postNalu
@emmwitha · 661 post𝖭𝗎𝗏𝗂𝖺
@lNuvial · 10,7511 postژِنـِرآلِنَقـآشـ اَرتِشهیتلِر
@painters_crow · 7581 post𝓜ari‘s Daily
@parkmrn · 3561 post𓏲⋆ ๋ دنیای کوچیک آریتی ⋆ִֶָ
@smallWorld010 · 1871 post-𝗦ᴛᴀʀ 𝗟ᴀᴡ
@star1aw · 121 postÉchos du Cœur
@tmtylm_eiyd · 451 postهمین فَــــࢪدا دوبٰاࢪه
@tomoag · 1241 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@NegsBookList · 1128 postsاسترو دیلی ( 🧡 )
@astroxdaily · 21,8714 postsㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ۫ ࣪ 𓏲 𝖠𝖽𝗌
@AdsNeg · 181 postCaram’Ell⛧𓈒࣪ ᭡ ⋆
@caramellmeowto · 5,1901 postNalu
@emmwitha · 661 postㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ۫ ࣪ 𓏲 𝖭𝖾𝗀 ִֶָ ༊·
@NgarsHome · 341 post𝑼𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒍🦋
@oncallfrin · 741 post𝖣𝖤𝖲𝖲𝖨𝖱𝖤 `
@vkookdesire · 3,3581 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Nargeswithani · 41411 postsׅ ֹ 🪭 ໋𝒞riׅmson ֹ ᜔°꩜🧣
@lilyofthevalle_yy · 1148 postsکتابخانهیعجیب
@itsdarkor · 1,4664 posts𝑎 𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑢𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑠
@poesiemeplait · 5513 posts"𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞!"
@Remembrance33 · 2383 postsCaram’Ell⛧𓈒࣪ ᭡ ⋆
@caramellmeowto · 5,1902 postsالیبوک کتابفروش فرفری🫐
@eliwbooks · 15,0072 postsɢʀᴇᴇɴ ɢɪʀʟ?🍀
@DarkRainyDays · 1,3841 post•Chamomileᰔ
@ENFJfriend · 1,2251 post☽︎۪ ࣪
@iblubutterfly · 1161 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@yegansdaily · 13,897#1
@letskills · 83,303#2
@thehanet · 2,617#3
@samepov · 51,823#4
@kdramathrapy · 17,646#5
@Stareshb · 83,294#6
@vibevk · 6,571#7
@himenosenpaie · 4,995#8
@heartree · 11,728#9
@hawlsu · 10,634#10
@Vernios_kpop · 9,234#11
@starme69 · 23#12
@sama_dailyart · 12,872#13
@blackstar_writes · 8,780#14
@aixcover · 8,424#15
@mihaae · 3,260#16
@elfairya · 3,119#17
@imchihiro · 12,258#18
@calciferworld · 14,600#19
@Lyricsteach · 40,833#20
@lltohill · 5,008#21
@plutonblue · 6,989#22
@fromleeyongbok · 594#23
@sakoouuraaa · 5,357 (as read 24 September 2026)#24
@ttpdella · 16,608#25
@sevenophile · 10,912#26
@cmbyourn · 357 (as read 24 September 2026)#27
@ParisianVillage · 4,905#28
@thusers · 29,201#29
@nuagejaune · 6,939#30
@arplumm · 3,848#31
@darcyslife · 4,197#32
@vinyvidzam · 60,314#33
@trashcandy · 62,161#34
@evilspiris · 12,757#35
@ponyoart · 661#36
@herwonderland · 214,821#37
@MakeYourCharacter · 111,775#38
@RegaPlus · 1,514,808#39
@veuphoriaar · 8,198#40
@OurMbtiDaily · 29,034#41
@sp4luv · 21,210#42
@GaLandarea · 4,790#43
@kimiko_english · 12,521#44
@MindsCubicle · 3,880#45
@mbti4Q · 4,590#46
@WomanatHerToilette · 2,943#47
@Beustaa · 18,715#48
@sleepy3tar · 7,694#49
@rooom505 · 10,331#50
@istarbeat · 22,987#51
@explorextelegram · 76,282#52
@p1ctok · 111,516 (as read 24 September 2026)#53
@iRoProxy · 8,009,981#54
@themoonbakery · 8,085#55
@Titiisblooming · 10,844#56
@mbtimoodi · 7,709#57
@ThemeTellgram · 9,601#58
@harinmood · 21,811#59
@iliya_yousfzadeh · 4,206#60
@hamclasixii · 112#61
@leetelma · 1,968#62
@lNaomll · 14,641#63
@gaamtu · 1,693#64
@xbeus · 19,514#65
@Abani_Blue · 23,823#66
@mood_giff · 2,082#67
@sourett · 5,560#68
@TH3EME · 4,812#69
@Themecore · 134,698#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dostoevskyinsiberia · 49,457
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@mmarrham · 78,997
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
@CityOfBooks · 70,323
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@sania_lifeam · 18,739
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 October 2026
@devanegii · 20,309
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 September 2026
@khatzendgii · 32,798
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@Ketab_17 · 23,754
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@akharin_dorna · 33,561
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
@harinmood · 21,811
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
@Haft4Channel · 19,438
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
@Horriblygood · 473
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@Hubottt · 91,590
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
@sajiazz · 17,522
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 September 2026
@ModBooks · 181,521
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@kierkegaard3 · 19,031
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@Abani_Blue · 23,823
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
@Wired3AM · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 17 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐍𝐠𝐚𝐫ִֶָ ☽︎۪ ࣪” (@The_Ngar), 22,419 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Ngar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.