اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟
- آره.0%
- نه صبر کن جوین بدم.0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@mbti4Q
On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,590subscribers
-309 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001720443077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mbti4Q |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mbti4Q |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel is in a group of 10 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 10:04 | 4,590 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:04 | 4,603 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:40 | 4,609 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 4,617 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 4,632 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:58 | 4,647 | -20 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 4,667 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 4,671 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 4,676 | -3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 4,679 | -25 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 4,704 | -22 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 4,726 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 4,749 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 4,755 | -16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 4,771 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:24 | 4,776 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 4,779 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 4,788 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 4,799 | -28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 4,827 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
دوتا ادمین دیگه بیاد🥺
بچهها چندتا ادمین میخوام کارش سخت نیست خودم بهتون آموزش میدم حقوقش هم خوبه بین ۶ تا ۸ میلیون درماهه اگه بینتون کسی هست که به کار ادمینی علاقمنده بیاید اینجا تا جزئیات کار رو براتون توضیح بدم: @AdminiAmoozesh ظرفیت محدود! بعد تکمیل لینک باطل میشه.
៕ #FACT ―――——— • تایپ هایی که در نوشتار بهتر از گفتار عمل میکنن : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ INFJ - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISTJ • ریلکس ترین و موفق ترین تایپ ها در پنهان کردن استرس : - تایپ ISTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ ENTP - تایپ ESTP • خسته ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISFP - تایپ ENFP - تایپ ENTP • منطقی ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ ENTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ ENTJ - تایپ ESTJ ―――———…
៕ #FUN ―――——— • تایپهای MBTI و آشپزی ـ ESTJ, INFJ, ISFJ, ENTJ : احتمالا آشپزهای خوبی هستن یا اگر امتحانش کنن از پسش برمیان. ـ ISTJ, INTJ : غذاهای ابتدایی رو بلدن درست کنن و از گرسنگی تلف نمیشن. ـ INFP, ENFP, ISFP : احتمالا فقط غذاهای نیمه آماده مثل ناگت و رامن و غیره رو امتحان میکنن. ـ ENFJ, ESFJ : آشپزی نمیکنن ولی بدشون نمیاد غذاهای ابداعی خودشون رو درست کنن. ـ ESFP, ESTP : تا به حال یه اجاق گاز از نزدیک ندید…
៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبهبندی تایپها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( آقایان )) 1= ISTJ 2= ESTJ 3= ISTP 4= ISFJ 5= ISFP 6= ESFJ 7= ESFP 8= ENFP 9= ESTP 10= INTP 11= INFP 12= ENTP 13= INTJ 14= ENTJ 15= ENFJ 16= INFJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes
៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبهبندی تایپها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( خانمها )) 1= ISFJ 2= ESFJ 3= ESFP 4= ISFP 5= ENFP 6= ISTJ 7= ESTJ 8= INFP 9= ENFJ 10= ESTP 11= ENTP 12= ISTP 13= INTP 14= INFJ 15= INTJ 16= ENTJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes
⩩🪐ببین... بــزرگتــریــن کــالج ماورائـی و فانتــزی رو برات آوردم. 🌙✨ اگر همیشه تو رمانها و فیلمهای فانتزی دنبال رؤیاهات گشتی، من یه پورتال برات آوردم که این دنیا رو برات واقعی کنم. 🐕⁺ 🌟@alfea_schooI @alfea_schooI🌟 ⩩🎀اینجا میتونی هرکسی که میخوای باشی، پس دست دوستات رو بگیر و با این دعوتنامه، سوار قطار شو و به کالج جادوگری آلفیا بیار. تست بده ببین جزء کدوم گروه میوفتی.🎀✉️
اگه تابستونه و میخوای جلوی بوی عرقتو بگیری : 🎀
اگه نمیخوای ارایشت بماسه : 🎀
#سوال_شما من تقریبا دوهفتس با یه پسره اشنا شدم رابطمون لانگه بنظذتون نود بدم سیسیااا؟ جواب 🎀
#سوال_شما دوس پسرم فوت فتیشه دوستام مسخره میکنن شما نظرتون چیه=))) جواب 🎀
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @mbti4Q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اونایی که شغل اینترنتی بدون سرمایه میخواستن اومدن؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mbti4Q named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ MBti 4Q ” (@mbti4Q), 4,590 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbti4Q.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.