Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 0/0

Channel

0/0

@error0error

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,283subscribers

+500 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001351601631
TypeChannel
Username@error0error
Description0/0 = undefined A labyrinth of ideas, A diary of curiosities Bot: @contactzero_bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/error0error

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,78311,29011,036.511,2836 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,707–11,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:1211,283-7
8 Nov 2026, 16:0711,290+7
7 Nov 2026, 11:1411,283+1
6 Nov 2026, 12:1811,282+5
5 Nov 2026, 09:3011,277+9
4 Nov 2026, 08:5911,268+10
2 Nov 2026, 12:4911,258+5
1 Nov 2026, 15:2611,253+13
31 Oct 2026, 14:2011,240+11
30 Oct 2026, 11:0811,229+1
29 Oct 2026, 11:3811,228+6
28 Oct 2026, 09:4711,222+8
27 Oct 2026, 09:4511,214+12
26 Oct 2026, 12:3711,202+11
25 Oct 2026, 11:4511,191+7
24 Oct 2026, 14:5711,184+18
23 Oct 2026, 15:5711,166+5
22 Oct 2026, 18:0811,161-2
21 Oct 2026, 12:0711,163-11
20 Oct 2026, 11:4611,174first reading

Engagement

179 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.49%
avg views ÷ 11,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
958
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
51
of 179 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held179 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total48,857
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,030
Videos
≈322
Links
≈821

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (3.92%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC583 viewsread 11 November 2026

Bot: شلون تحصل مسبات بأسرع طريقة

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

10 Nov 2026, 05:43 UTC820 viewsread 11 November 2026

Bot: قمة العبث تقارن فيروز بأي شي تاني

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

9 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC886 viewsread 11 November 2026

A number of linguists have maintained that gesture and language form a unified whole, that no sharp boundary can be drawn between language and gesture. Similarly, some gesture theorists suggest that gesture and speech are tightly integrated, and even, in McNeill’s view, represent two aspects of a single process of utterance. Thus speech and gesture often express different, though related meanings, each complementing …

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

9 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC840 viewsread 11 November 2026

Certainly we shouldn’t pity him if we didn’t believe that he had pains; but is this a philosophical, a metaphysical belief? Does a realist pity more that an idealist or a solipsist? — Ludwig Wittgenstein

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

9 Nov 2026, 12:11 UTC816 viewsread 11 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

8 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC938 viewsread 11 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Haidar A. Fahad

Showing the 12 most recent of 179 posts we hold for @error0error. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حُبًّا للقراءة
@freebooksf · 205,362
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
Beauty of soul
@beauty_d3 · 26,261
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
Tasks Resources
@taskvids · 21,908
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
حياةٌ بلا مكابح
@industrious22 · 20,507
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
لامرئيات الفن السابع 📽
@cinemaartegy · 133,295
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Art is a way of survival
@artaway · 18,928
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 October 2026
مكتبة المليون كتاب
@lovekotob · 502,748
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Read more
@Reading12 · 25,738
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
عالم الكتب PDF
@Lovers_of_books · 179,959
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
الفيلسوف الجديد
@newphilosopher · 27,754
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,497
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 September 2026
فريدريك نيتشه
@Nietzsche1 · 36,150
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
HASKLAY 24 - هاسكلاي
@hasklay · 38,639
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 30 August 2026
علم النفس وتحليل الشخصية
@psycho_mh · 26,737
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
MasterMinds jobs
@mastermindsjobs · 54,416
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
باروخ سبينوزا
@Spinoza_2021 · 22,684
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
شوبنهاور - سيوران
@Schopenhauer_Cioran · 24,154
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
فلسفة وفقط فلسفة
@iiollr · 68,631
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
وكالة الرأي الدولية
@alraiiq · 44,374
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
T
@tea_sugar · 21,865
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
ألبير كامو Albert Camus
@Camus_Al · 24,115
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
فُصحى
@wzclil · 64,090
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Private Art
@privateart · 49,193
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
فن - لوحات عالمية - Art Gallery
@artdm · 26,037
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“0/0” (@error0error), 11,283 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/error0error.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.