Channel
@error0error
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,839subscribers
+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001351601631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @error0error |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/error0error |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 10,839 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 10,835 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 10,828 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 10,830 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 10,827 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 10,812 | +29 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 10,783 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 10,783 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,682 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
عزيزتي [.....] بلى أَنا مُشتاقٌ وَعِندِيَ لَوعَةٌ وَلَكِنَّ مِثلي لا يُذاعُ لَهُ سِرُّ إِذا اللَيلُ أَضواني بَسَطتُ يَدَ الهَوى وَأَذلَلتُ دَمعًا مَن خَلائِقُه الكِبَرُ تَكادُ تُضيءُ النارُ بَينَ جَوانِحي إِذا هِيَ أَذكَتها الصَبابَةُ وَالفِكرُ كلّي شَوقٌ لكِ ولأيّامِ السَهَرِ والسَمَر. وكلّي شَوقٌ كذلك لأيّامٍ عِشناها في خيالِنا حتى صارَت كأنّها ذكرياتٌ مِنْ عُمرٍ مَضَى وانقَضَى رغمَ أنّه لَم يأتِ بَعد. كانت الفتر…
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
عزيزتي [.....]، أمّا بعد... قررتُ أخذ نصيحة أُميمة الخليل وهي تغني: "وقلت بكتبلك، هيك كانوا يعملوا العشاق هيك كانوا يولّعوا نارُن على ثلج الاوراق" لكن بالنظر إلى أنّي لم أتعلم يومًا الفنّ العظيم في كتابة الرسائل بين الأحباب والعشّاق (فلَم يكن هناك داعٍ لذلك، رغم كثرة الأحباب والعشاق، فالفن العظيم يتطلب وجودَ مَن يُقدِّرُه)، فلم أعرف من أين أبدأ أو كيف أُعبِّر عمّا أفكر وأشعر. [.....] عندما تحاولُ قولَ كل شيء مرةً وا…
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
ملاحظة: إرتأيتُ في بعضِ الأجزاءِ خصوصيةً فمسحتُها وأبدلتُها بالعلامة [.....]
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
هذه بعضُ رسائلٍ كتبها صديقٌ لي لحبيبةٍ مضت، فلمّا افترقا أعادتهم له في صندوقٍ من خشب. فأخبرني بما معناه: «كانت هذه الرسائل أشبه بهمسٍ أو مؤامرةٍ حلوةٍ بين حبيبَين، أو هي لعبةٌ يختلق فيها طفلان عالمًا خياليًا هما وحدهما فيه لا يدخله الكبار. فلمّا افترقنا انفضّت المؤامرة وانهدم الخيال، فلَم يبقَ من الديارِ إلا الطلل، ومن الرسائل إلا ما فيها من جمال العبارة وحسن الصياغة. ولمّا حُلَّت عُرى المودّة وانفصمت خيوطُ العِشرة …
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
File, posted without a caption
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
File, posted without a caption
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
File, posted without a caption
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
File, posted without a caption
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
نصٌّ كأنه لوحةٌ أو ملحمة، وصورٌ كأنّها شِعرٌ بوزنٍ وقافية
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
https://youtu.be/fIQLH6Qf2-g?si=A_3uEsGb4KHLvIGu
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
The history of every day. — What is the history of your every day? Consider the habits of which it consists: are they the product of innumerable little acts of cowardice and laziness or of your courage and innovative reason? Different as the two cases may be, people could conceivably give you equal praise and you might actually benefit them equally either way. However, praise and benefit and respectability may be eno…
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
𖤓 المُرَعَّث 𖤓
Signed Haidar A. Fahad
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @error0error. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 71,687 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0/0” (@error0error), 10,839 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/error0error.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.