Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for موسوعة ٨٨ حضارة

Channel

موسوعة ٨٨ حضارة

@EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,099subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001462258369
TypeChannel
Username@EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations

Growth

2,0832,0992,0911 September 2026 — 2,083 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,083 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,099 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,097 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,099 subscribers1 September 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,081–2,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:382,099+2
11 Sept 2026, 19:012,097-2
7 Sept 2026, 15:402,099+16
2 Sept 2026, 07:532,083no change
1 Sept 2026, 18:152,083first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 2,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total3,027
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 53s
Average length
3m 53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7273.5%
🤔1414.3%
👏88.16%
👍11.02%
🕊11.02%
😱11.02%
🥰11.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC24 viewsread 1 September 2026

«لا يبدأ التفكير إلا عند النقطة التي ندرك فيها أن العقل، الذي مُجِّد لقرون، هو أشد خصوم التفكير عنادًا.» -مارتن هايدغر، ما الذي يسمى بالتفكير؟

1 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC24 viewsread 1 September 2026

يجب أن تكون مستعدًا لحرق نفسك في لهيبك؛ كيف يمكنك النهوض من جديد إذا لم تصبح رمادًا أولًا؟ -فريدريك نيتشه، هكذا تكلم زرادشت.

28 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC195 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

انت تاريخ الرأسمالية هو تاريخ الإستعمار..

2🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC226 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

وَاصْبِرْ عَلَى مَا يَقُولُونَ وَاهْجُرْهُمْ هَجْرًا جَمِيلًا.

10

24 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC365 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026

”رجل فرد هو لسان السماء. فوقه الله لا سواه. ومن تحته سائر عباد الله من المؤمنين. ولكن هذا الرجل يأبى أن يداخله من ذلك كِبر. بل يبتعد عن ذلك ويحشد نفسه كلها لمحاربة الزهو في سريرته، قبل أن يحاربه في سرائر تابعيه. ولو أن هذا الرسول بما أنعم من الهداية على الناس وما تم له من العزة والقوة، وما استقام له من السلطان، اعتد بذلك كله واعتزّ، لما كان عليه جناح من أحد، لأنه إنما يعتد بقيمة ماثلة، ويعتز بمزية طائلة. يطريه أصحابه

🤔1😱1

24 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC319 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

المولد النبوي الشريف ١٢ من ربيع الأول ١٤٤٨ هـ

2

23 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC346 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

في الحرب، الحقيقة أولى الضحايا -إسخيلوس(525 ق.م - 456 ق.م.)

3

21 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC314 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @HS_SLM

ثالثًا (3/3): كيف نشأت العلمانية إذن؟ هذا السؤال تمت الإجابة عنه عدة مرات في الصفحة، لكن نعيد ذلك بصيغة مختلفة لمن لم يكن متابعًا. لا يمكننا فهم نشأة العلمانية دون فهم طبيعة المسيحية؛ فالعلمانية ليست مفهومًا مناقضًا للمسيحية، بل هي جزء أصيل من تكوينها الأول، فهي منذ نشأتها تفصل بين الديني والدنيوي، وتفصل بين الزمني والروحي. واللفظ في حد ذاته نشأ من داخل الكنيسة نفسها للتمييز بين القساوسة الذين يعيشون بين الناس، وا

3

21 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC240 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @HS_SLM

ثانيًا (2/3): هل جاءت العلمانية لإنهاء الحروب الدينية؟ هذه السردية أيضًا تقوم على قدر كبير من التبسيط الذي لا يصمد أمام التاريخ. فالحروب التي شهدتها أوروبا في القرنين السادس عشر والسابع عشر لم تكن مجرد حروب بين الكاثوليك والبروتستانت، كما أن إنهاءها لم يكن نتيجة لظهور العلمانية. نعم، كان الدين عاملًا له أثره في الحروب الأهلية والصراعات بين الأوروبيين، لكن المؤرخين أصبحوا حاليًا يتجهون أكثر نحو الأخذ في الاعتبار الأ

21 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC204 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @HS_SLM

وكذلك يمكننا، بالمعايير نفسها، القول إن المؤسسات العلمية الغربية الحالية معادية للعلم لمجرد أنها تقدم الأيديولوجيا في قضايا التي تمس الجندر والصواب السياسي، وتطرد وتلاحق كل من يصر على إحدى أبسط الحقائق العلمية، مثل: ذكر وأنثى. فكما أن هذه الأمثلة لا تعني أن الثورة الفرنسية أو الاتحاد السوفييتي أو الأكاديميات المعاصرة هي قوى مناهضة للعلم، فإن سردية أن الكنيسة كانت «ضد العلم» بالمعنى المطلق هي أيضًا سخيفة وأقرب إلى ال

21 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC232 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @HS_SLM

غالبية من يتحدثون عن العلمانية، سواء مؤيدين لها أو معارضين، في العالم العربي، يسلكون الطريق الأقصر والأسهل: «العلمانية نشأت من صراع الكنيسة والعلم»، أو «العلمانية كانت الحل للحروب الدينية». ومن هنا يأتي الاستنتاج الجاهز لدى الطرفين: يقول المدافع عنها: «رأيتم؟ الدين ضد العلم، وهو سبب الحروب»، ويرد عليه المناهض لها: «المسيحية هي التي ضد العلم، أما الإسلام فلا علاقة له بالعلمانية». المشكلة أن الطرفين، رغم اختلافهما، ير

1

20 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC243 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @HS_SLMVideo

نعم، سردية نشأة العلمانية من أجل سواد عيون «العلم»، أو لإحلال السلام في العالم ونشر التسامح، هي سردية طفولية وقصة جميلة يمكن الاستمتاع بها قبل النوم، لكنها لا تعكس في شيء حقيقة ما حدث. الذي جرى في أوروبا لم يكن فصلًا بين الدين والدولة، بل فصلًا بين الكنيسة والدولة، أو إخضاعًا للكنيسة لسلطة الدولة. كان صراعًا على السلطة بين مؤسسة دينية ومؤسسة سياسية، بدأ منذ أن قررت الإمبراطورية تبنّي المسيحية واستعمالها أداةً لإنهاء

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روائع الأدب الساخر
@TNT_1000 · 27,646
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
شوبنهاور - سيوران
@Schopenhauer_Cioran · 24,359
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
فريدريك نيتشه
@Nietzsche1 · 36,364
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
المكتبة الهندسية
@t3leemkhrbaa · 23,282
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“موسوعة ٨٨ حضارة” (@EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations), 2,099 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EncyclopediaOf88Civilizations.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.