8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,968–20,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:14
19,986
+1
11 Aug 2026, 23:33
19,985
+4
11 Aug 2026, 01:42
19,981
-13
10 Aug 2026, 02:26
19,994
-5
8 Aug 2026, 23:30
19,999
+11
7 Aug 2026, 22:11
19,988
+16
6 Aug 2026, 18:40
19,972
-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:37
19,973
first reading
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.64%
avg views ÷ 19,986 subscribers
Avg views / post
928
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
70 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
64,984
Reactions total
1,773
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 51s
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,773 reactions across 70 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
992
56.0%
👍
652
36.8%
😢
98
5.53%
💯
17
0.959%
😱
6
0.338%
🕊
5
0.282%
👌
3
0.169%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,773reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أول مرة في حياتي يستوقفني قول الله تعالى:
﴿حَتَّىٰ إِذَا ضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمُ الْأَرْضُ بِمَا رَحُبَتْ﴾
سبحان الله... هذا هو الشعور الذي بداخلي، لكنني لم أكن أعرف كيف أصفه.
الأرض كلها، رغم كبرها واتساعها، كأنها ضاقت فعلا.
ثم أقرأ:
﴿وَضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمْ أَنْفُسُهُمْ﴾
نعم يا رب، نعم... ضاقت.
ثم أقرأ:
﴿وَظَنُّوا أَن لَّا مَلْجَأَ مِنَ اللَّهِ إِلَّا إِلَيْهِ ۖ ثُمَّ تَابَ عَلَيْهِمْ لِيَتُوبُوا﴾
يا رب، لا ملجأ منك …
رجلٌ رأى في هاتفه اتصالاً فائتاً من أحد الناس.
فلم ينتظر أن يعاود المتصل الاتصال مرةً أخرى،
ولم يقل:
"إذا كان الأمر مهماً فسيتصل مجدداً."
بل بادر بالاتصال عليه،
وقال بلطف:
"رأيت أنك اتصلت بي، هل كنت تحتاج شيئاً؟"
فلعلّ صاحب الاتصال كان يستحي من تكرار الاتصال،
أو خشي أن يزعج غيره،
فاكتفى بمحاولةٍ واحدة.
فكانت مبادرتك بالسؤال والاهتمام
نوعًا من الإحسان،
وإدخالاً للسرور على قلب أخيك
{وَأَحۡسِنُوۤا۟ 👈🏻 إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ…
خلاصة التدبر .. تدبر معي
تأمل كيف الله عز وجل أظهر اللطف في الآية قبل عرض الخوف بـ {يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ}؛ نداء عام، يشملك أنت وأنا، لا يستثني أحداً!
ثم أنظر ترتيب الآية يعلّمنا: اعرف ربك، ثم خف من يوم لقائه، ثم غيّر حياتك قبل أن يأتي ذلك اليوم. فليس لطف الله أن يحذف عنك الحقيقة المخيفة؛ بل لطفه أن يحذّرك منها قبل أن تصل إليها.
وهذه وحدها نعمة عظيمة: أن يخبرك الله اليوم بما سيحدث غداً، حتى تستطيع أن تغيّر غدك وأ…
••
«ولولا ستر الله لفاحت منا رائحة الذنوب».
يا لها من كلمة!
كم من ذنب ستره الله، وكم من تقصير أخفاه، وكم من عيب لم يطلع عليه الناس، ولو كشف الله للخلق بعض ما ستره عنا، لما استطاع أحدنا أن يرفع رأسه أمام أحد.
إن ستر الله على عبده نعمة من النعم الغائبة التي ربما لا نشعر بها، وهي نعمة تستحق من العبد شكرًا لا ينقطع.
فهنالك السيئة، والنكتة، والأثر.
فإذا استغفر العبد ربه وتاب إليه، محا الله عنه ذنبه، وبقي من آثار الذ…
🪧لفتة قرآنية🪧
قال:ربّ أنى يكون!
قال:كذلك اللّه يفعل.
لا إرادة لمخلوق تعلو إرادة الخالق؛ فاطمئن .!
وبعد؛ فمن ظن أنّه يملك؛
فليهب نفسه كل ما يشتهي قبل أن يهب غيره،
ويكفيه لو يقدر أن يبسط لراحة البال في نفسه أمدًا طويلًا،
فقط لو يقدر وهو الذي تخزيه كلمة وتفرحه كلمة،
بل وكلمة لا يُلقى لها بال ..!
#نهلة_الهبيان
#لفتة_قرآنية
♡゙ ♡゙
كلما تثاقلت عن الورد تذكر...
أنه هذا كلام الله العظيم
الذي سيجري على لسانك
وسيتردد في عقلك
وسيتدفق في داخلك
فيصلح كل شيء!!!
يُرَمِّمُ ما نعلم وما لا نعلم،
حتى دون أن نشعر...
ينفذ إلى زوايا بعيدة في نفسك
فيُحدث فيها ما يصعب حكايته ووصفه..
#وردك_يا_محبا_لله
༻✿༺
❤21👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @GhRoooh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@GhRoooh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 5,483 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
البسيط في علم التجويد @xcvbnggjkkkkkqwer · 139,163 Telegram ranks this channel #98 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ليدبروا آياته♡” (@GhRoooh), 19,986 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GhRoooh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.