Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⛈ غيث ⛈

Channel

⛈ غيث ⛈

@WithinU2

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,640subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413823440
TypeChannel
Username@WithinU2
Description♡قنواتنا♡ #ليدبروا آياته (قناة لكل مايخص التدبر) @GhRoooh •○•○•○•○ #منبه_الأذكار للتواصي على الذكر @GhRoooh24 •○•○•○•○ منهج الطفل المسلم @Ghroooh2 •○•○•○ #غيث (قناة لنشر الوعي) @WithinU2 ○•○•○ #حفظ_سورة_البقرة (قناة لتلقين وتثبيت البقرة) @GhRoooh23
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WithinU2

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@WithinU2/34207 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641308 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC1.002 days
@WithinU2/34215 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641288 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC1.0026 hours
@WithinU2/34220 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641248 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC1.009.5 hours
@WithinU2/34227 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641188 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC1.003.3 hours
@WithinU2/34232 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641328 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@WithinU2/34223 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC@alklmaalteba_77/641218 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC0.998.1 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@alklmaalteba_777 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008.8 hoursthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 173 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @WithinU2 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,5397,6517,5956 August 2026 — 7,550 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,550 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,539 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,545 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,579 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,595 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,603 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,598 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,593 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,592 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,590 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,595 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,592 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,590 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,587 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,569 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,562 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,566 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,559 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,574 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,582 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,638 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,651 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,640 subscribers7,6406 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,522–7,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 21:047,640-11
5 Nov 2026, 16:467,651+13
2 Nov 2026, 07:187,638+56
30 Oct 2026, 06:357,582+8
27 Oct 2026, 12:517,574+15
24 Oct 2026, 05:057,559-7
17 Oct 2026, 20:567,566+4
14 Oct 2026, 23:467,562-7
11 Oct 2026, 08:597,569-18
5 Oct 2026, 07:417,587-3
27 Sept 2026, 04:367,590-2
18 Sept 2026, 06:167,592-3
14 Sept 2026, 03:007,595+5
10 Sept 2026, 05:387,590-2
5 Sept 2026, 08:577,592-1
1 Sept 2026, 05:367,593-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:167,598-5
26 Aug 2026, 02:447,603+8
22 Aug 2026, 19:397,595+18
18 Aug 2026, 23:527,577first reading

Engagement

331 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.67%
avg views ÷ 7,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
433
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 331 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held331 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total56,759
Reactions total1,334
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,000
Videos
≈1,840
Links
≈5,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
44m 17s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,446 reactions across 320 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,44871.0%
👍69420.1%
💔1032.99%
💯611.77%
😭471.36%
😢441.28%
😁401.16%
👎30.087%
😱20.058%
🤩20.058%
🫡20.058%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 330 of the 331 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,533 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 331 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 36 of 131 posts held from the last 30 days (27.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

تأمل قصة الثلاثة الذين انطبقت عليهم الصخرة في الغار. الأول: توسل إلى الله ببره والثاني: بعفته والثالث: بإحسانه تخيل نفسك الرابع بينهم، ياترى بماذا كنت ستتوسل؟! إن من أشد الحسرة أن يفتش الإنسان في أعماله، ثم لا يجد شيئاً يدخل به على الله.. 💔

❤3

11 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC218 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

◆قل للواقفين بغير باب الله: (يا طول هوانكم)!! ◆وقل للآملين في غير فضل الله: (يا خيبة أمالكم)!! ◆وقل للعاملين لغير وجه الله: (يا ضيعة أعمالكم)!! #ابن_الجوزي ༻✿༺

👍4💔2

11 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC223 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

كلُّ محبةٍ تُبيحُ لصاحِبها أن يُؤذي من يُحبُّ ليست محبةً كاملةً، فإنَّ أولَ ما يُثمره الحبُّ أن يُهذِّبَ يدَ صاحبه ولسانَه وقلبَه عن كلِّ ما يُؤلم حبيبَه، ولن تجتمع صفةُ المُحبِّ وصفةُ المؤذي في شخصٍ واحد، إنما يُحبُّك من يراك عزيزًا على قلبه لدرجةٍ تمنعُه من أن يُؤذيَك؛ لأنَّ الحبَّ إذا دخل قلبًا نزع منه شيئًا اسمُه القسوة. - حَمْدِي الأمين ༻✿༺

❤4

11 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC234 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

تعلّم أن تعبر طريقك بثقة دون أن ترتهن لما يظنه الآخرون؛ فنظرات الناس وأحكامهم ليست سوى انعكاس لعقولهم وظروفهم هم، أما واقعك فهو ما تصنعه أنت بإيمانك وسعيك. 「🫆بصمة」 ༻✿༺

👍5

11 Nov 2026, 06:21 UTC241 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

•• أحياناً من المعاناة يولد الأمل. ༻✿༺

❤4

11 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC249 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ليكن لديك دائمًا مشروع جديد لتبدأه، الحياة تبدأ قبل التخرج وتبدأ بعده، تبدأ قبل الزواج وتبدأ بعده، تبدأ بعد الطلاق، وبعد فقد الوالدين وبعد فقد الأحبة.. ما دمت تتنفس فهناك دائمًا ثمة بداية.. لا تقل أبدًا قد انتهيت... ༻✿༺

👍4

10 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC385 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

إلهي انقطع الرجاء إلا منك.. وخاب الظن إلا فيك.. وقلَّ الاعتماد إلا عليك.. فيقيني بك لا حدود له.. فتولني.. ولا تكلني لنفسي طرفة عين.. ༻✿༺

❤12

10 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC385 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ربنا واجعل أفعالنا أصدق من أقوالنا فلقد مُلئت الدنيا بالأقوال دون الأفعال ༻✿༺

❤9

10 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC404 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ليست كل القناعات التي نعيش بها ناتجة عن تفكيرنا… كثير منها مجرد أفكار تكررت حتى بدت حقائق. مثل: أن النجاح يعني وظيفة ثابتة، أو أن التأخر في الزواج مشكلة، أو أن الصوت العالي دليل قوة. هذه ليست حقائق، بل تصورات اكتسبت شرعيتها من التكرار لا من الفهم. ومع الوقت، لا نعود نبحث عن الحقيقة… بل عما ينسجم مع ما اعتدناه. ولهذا، تغيير الفكرة أصعب من تصحيح الخطأ، لأن المشكلة ليست في المعلومة… بل في مقاومة العقل لما يهدد استقرا…

❤3👍1

10 Nov 2026, 15:58 UTC414 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

(وقولوا للناس حُسنًا) ༻✿༺

👍4😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 331 posts we hold for @WithinU2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@WithinU2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ليدبروا آياته♡
@GhRoooh · 20,733
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
أخصائية نفسية 👑
@dohaahmed6 · 39,569
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
فارس عنتر
@Quran_j · 163,366
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⛈ غيث ⛈” (@WithinU2), 7,640 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WithinU2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.