Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

منهاج السالكين

@vli4r

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,978subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001912509222
TypeChannel
Username@vli4r
Descriptionhttps://t.me/iiillliii1111
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vli4r

Growth

4,9524,9784,9657 August 2026 — 4,952 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,952 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,957 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,978 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,948–4,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:524,978+21
7 Aug 2026, 23:154,957+5
7 Aug 2026, 13:174,952no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:034,952first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.3%
avg views ÷ 4,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (22 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total26,665
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
490
Videos
112
Links
81

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC321 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏الأصل في البشرية هو التديّن وليس اللادينية، والأصل في البشرية هو التوحيد لا الشرك، يدل على هذا قوله تعالى: ﴿كَانَ ٱلنَّاسُ أُمَّةࣰ وَ ٰ⁠حِدَةࣰ فَبَعَثَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلنَّبِیِّـۧنَ مُبَشِّرِینَ وَمُنذِرِینَ﴾. ‏جاء عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما بإسناد صحيح كما عند الحاكم في «المستدرك» والطبري وغيرهما أنه قال في تفسير هذه الآية: "كان بين نوح وآدم عشرة قرون، كلهم على شريعة من الحق فاختلفوا، فبعَث الله النبيين مبشرين ومنذرين".

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC668 viewsread 12 August 2026

أنت بخير: ١. ما حفظت عليك لسانك وأكثرت من الصمت. ٢. ما منعت عينك عن حياة الآخرين. ٣. ما جاهدت قلبك عن شهوات الدنيا. ٤. إن كان أهلك أولى الناس بخيرك. ٥. وإن كان القرآن صاحبك وأُنسك.

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC808 viewsread 12 August 2026

لا يغرّك ثناء المادحين، مهما قالوا عنك، فإنهم لا يعلمون عن الأمور التي سترك الله بها، ولو كُشف لهم هذا الستار لما صافحوك، وما أقبلوا عليك كما كانوا يقبلون، فلا تغتر بهذه الألسنة التي تودي بقلبك إلى مهلكة، العبرة أين موقعك عند الله؟ هل شيّدت بنيانه أم جعلته هاويًا خربا.

5 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC934 viewsread 12 August 2026

في إخفاء الدعاء فوائد عديدة: أحدها: أنه أعظم إيمانًا؛ لأن صاحبه يعلم أن اللّٰه يسمع الدعاء الخفي. ثانيها: أنه أعظم في الأدب والتعظيم؛ لأن الملوك لا ترفع الأصوات عندهم، ومن رفع صوته لديهم مقتوه، ولله المثل الأعلى. فإذا كان يسمع الدعاء الخفي فلا يليق بالأدب بين يديه إلا خفض الصوت به. ثالثها: أنه أبلغ في التضرع والخشوع الذي هو روح الدعاء ولبه ومقصوده؛ فإن الخاشع الذليل إنما يسأل مسألة مسكين ذليل قد انكسر قلبه، وذلت

3 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC924 viewsread 12 August 2026

«كَفَى بالمَرءِ كَذِبًا أن يُحَدِّثَ بكُلِّ مَا سَمِعَ» • صحيح مسلم

3 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

{يَاأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِنْ جَاءَكُمْ فَاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوا أَنْ تُصِيبُوا قَوْمًا بِجَهَالَةٍ فَتُصْبِحُوا عَلَى مَا فَعَلْتُمْ نَادِمِينَ} نحن في هذا العصر أحوج ممَّن قبلنا إلى التثبُّت في سماع الأخبار؛ لكثرة الكذب، وظهور الفجور في الخصومة، وكثرة الاختلاف، وشدَّة مكر الأعداء. عافانا الله وإياكم من الظلم والافتراء والإساءة.

31 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚫️اللَّهُمَّ آتِ كُلَّ ذِي سُؤلٍ سُؤلَه، وكُلَّ ذِي سَقمٍ بُرءَه، وكُلَّ ذِي حاجَةٍ حاجَتَه.

31 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alshafea

[ كراهية حلق اللحية لدى الشافعي ] الذي يفهم المراد من عبارته -أي الشافعي رحمه الله- هم علماء مذهبه، وخاصة المحققون منهم، فلا مجال أن يأتي شخص لا يفهم اصطلاحات الشافعية ويصرح بشيء فهمه من نص الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله دون الرجوع إلى ما فهمه منه محققو المذهب. والذي يدل على أن المراد بقوله رحمه الله: (وإن كان في اللحية لا يجوز) الكراهة أمور: الأول: أنه ذكر ذلك استطرادا في كلامه على مسألة الجناية، والمعروف أن الكلام في

29 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 12 August 2026

أخوكم العبد الفقير مريض، ويلتمس منكم الدعاء له بالشفاء والعافية، جزيتم خيرا.

29 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

[ تعظيمُ حقِّ الزوج من شعائر الإسلام ] جاءت امرأة إلى النبي ﷺ فقالت: يا رسول الله! أنا وافدة النساء إليك، هذا الجهاد كتبه الله على الرجال، فإن يُصيبوا أُجروا، وإن قُتلوا كانوا أحياء عند ربهم يرزقون، ونحن معاشر النساء نقوم عليهم، فما لنا من ذلك؟ قال: فقال رسول الله ﷺ : «أبلغي من لقيت من النساء، إن طاعة الزوج واعترافًا بحقه يعدل ذلك، وقليل منكن من يفعله» [أخرجه البزار والطبراني]. تأملي هذا اللفظ النبوي الشديد: "واعتر

28 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏« أنَّ نشر العلم وبث العلم سدٌ مانعٌ بتوفيق الله جَلَّ وَعَلَا من الوقوع فيما حرم الله، ولاسيما ما يتعلق بالشرك » ✍🏻 الشيخ صالح عبدالعزيز سندي

28 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 August 2026

[ بين نساء السلف ونساء اليوم ] قالت امرأة سعيد بن المسيب رحمه الله: « ما كنا نُكلِّم أزواجَنا إلا كما تُكلِّمون أمراءَكم: أصلحك الله، عافاك الله » فهذا أدب نساء السلف؛ يعظمن حق الزوج، ويحفظن لسانهن، ويرين طاعته في المعروف دينًا يُتقرَّب به إلى الله. أما اليوم، فقد ابتليت بيوتٌ كثيرة بنساءٍ يخالفن أزواجهن، ولا يُلقين لكلامهم بالًا، ويُنازعنهم القوامة، ويردن أن يكون الأمر لهن، وأن يُفرض رأيُهن على الزوج، فإذا لم يُط

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @vli4r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,469 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“منهاج السالكين” (@vli4r), 4,978 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vli4r.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.