Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +697. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65,771–66,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:39
66,613
-15
15 Sept 2026, 19:38
66,628
-23
14 Sept 2026, 01:40
66,651
+93
12 Sept 2026, 05:41
66,558
+197
10 Sept 2026, 02:57
66,361
-46
6 Sept 2026, 19:16
66,407
+91
4 Sept 2026, 04:19
66,316
-11
2 Sept 2026, 20:28
66,327
-10
1 Sept 2026, 19:14
66,337
-34
31 Aug 2026, 22:39
66,371
-8
31 Aug 2026, 01:35
66,379
+32
30 Aug 2026, 02:15
66,347
-12
29 Aug 2026, 00:16
66,359
+3
28 Aug 2026, 02:03
66,356
+119
27 Aug 2026, 00:34
66,237
+27
25 Aug 2026, 21:35
66,210
-13
24 Aug 2026, 19:43
66,223
+15
23 Aug 2026, 05:38
66,208
+234
21 Aug 2026, 19:37
65,974
-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:16
65,978
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 66,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,600
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
85 (23 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
613,580
Reactions total
9,400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 01:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈72
Links
≈478
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
18,725 reactions across 85 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,618
51.4%
❤
4,812
25.7%
🔥
1,366
7.30%
🤔
902
4.82%
👏
833
4.45%
😱
473
2.53%
🤯
464
2.48%
🙏
95
0.507%
😁
84
0.449%
🎉
39
0.208%
🥰
24
0.128%
🤩
15
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,725 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Amazon vs. Meta.
Amazon ha bloqueado a Muse, el nuevo agente personal de Meta, para impedir que pueda comprar en su plataforma. No es el primer caso: Amazon ya ha limitado anteriormente agentes de Google, OpenAI y Perplexity.
El conflicto anticipa una batalla mucho mayor: si los agentes de IA empiezan a navegar, comprar y contratar servicios por nosotros, podrían convertirse en la nueva puerta de entrada a internet…
Ha llegado de nuevo esa época del año en la que los grandes ejecutivos tecnológicos presentan sus nuevas gafas inteligentes. La semana pasada, Evan Spiegel, CEO de Snap, mostró sus próximas Specs de realidad aumentada, y esta semana será el turno de Mark Zuckerberg durante la conferencia anual Meta Connect. Se espera que Meta anuncie unas nuevas gafas inteligentes sin cámara que saldrían a la venta en octubre, además…
Aprovecho que es domingo para compartir este mini-curso de iniciación al trading que grabé hace unas semanas:
Guía para hacer trading desde cero si eres principiante 👇
https://linktw.in/YEskuD
🗣️ El desarrollador de la IA Claude, Anthropic, planea salir a bolsa en noviembre con una valoración estimada de 2 billones de dólares.
Parece que las preocupaciones sobre la seguridad de la IA no son suficientes para parar su salida a bolsa, lo cuál es una buena noticia para los mercados.
Se espera que Anthropic alcance más de 110 mil millones de dólares en ingresos anualizados para fin de año.
La IA no solo preocupa por su posible impacto sobre las personas, sino también por la supervivencia de los medios de comunicación.
En una demanda por derechos de autor presentada por varios editores, entre ellos The New York Times, contra OpenAI y Microsoft, se citan documentos internos en los que ejecutivos de ambas compañías reconocen que los productos de IA representan una “amenaza existencial” para los medios. U…
Dejando a un lado el debate sobre la seguridad de la IA, la decisión de ayer de la Reserva Federal de subir los tipos de interés podría convertirse en un problema importante para el sector a corto plazo.
El encarecimiento de la financiación afectará especialmente a las pequeñas empresas y startups que dependen de deuda para construir centros de datos, como las nuevas compañías de infraestructura cloud. Si además la …
Las grandes tecnológicas parecen copiarse hasta en los nombres: Apple One, Google One y ahora Meta One. Salvo el antiguo Amazon One, todos son servicios de suscripción que agrupan funciones adicionales. Con el auge de la IA, este modelo está ganando importancia: Google ya incluye mayor acceso a su IA dentro de Google One y Meta One ofrecerá más uso de IA y herramientas adicionales para sus aplicaciones sociales.
La …
¿A quién le gusta la idea de ralentizar el desarrollo de la IA? A los inversores en software. Empresas como Salesforce, Shopify, ServiceNow y Figma subieron el lunes, mientras que neoclouds y fabricantes de chips cayeron. Tiene sentido: si la IA avanza más despacio, el software tradicional gana tiempo y la demanda de infraestructura para IA podría enfriarse.
Aun así, probablemente sea una reacción puntual del mercad…
🗣️ Mi opinión sobre este miedo repentino a la IA:
Todo este miedo alrededor de la IA está bastante exagerado.
No creo que nadie vaya a pisar realmente el freno. Mucho de lo que estamos viendo ahora es retórica: grandes (y muy ricos) ejecutivos del sector intentando cubrirse las espaldas, mostrar responsabilidad y decir públicamente lo que toca decir.
Pero, ¿de verdad creéis que las grandes tecnológicas van a ralen…
El CEO de Anthropic pide frenar la carrera de la inteligencia artificial.
Dario Amodei, CEO de Anthropic, ha vuelto a encender el debate sobre los riesgos de la IA después de publicar un nuevo ensayo en el que propone reducir el ritmo al que avanza la frontera tecnológica. Su mensaje ha generado reacciones durante todo el fin de semana, incluyendo muestras de acuerdo de figuras como Sam Altman y Elon Musk.
Amodei n…
🗣️ Larry Ellison, presidente de Oracle, ha cancelado el plan 10b5‑1 que le permitía vender hasta 50 millones de acciones, valoradas en unos 7.500 millones de dólares al precio actual.
El mercado suele interpretar este tipo de decisiones como una señal de confianza del fundador y mayor accionista en la compañía.
No está comprando, pero decidir no vender a estos precios refuerza la idea de que considera Oracle infrav…
Aprovecho que es sábado para compartir este mini-curso de iniciación al trading que grabé hace unas semanas:
Guía para hacer trading desde cero si eres principiante 👇
https://linktw.in/YEskuD
❤37👍28👏8🙏3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @Enriquemorisoficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Enriquemorisoficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🧱LAS GANGAS DE ANDREA🏠 @lasgangasdeandrea · 24,401 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Adrián Sáenz - Canal de Telegram @adriansaenzc · 32,472 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
BolsaZone Free 📈 @bolsazonefreezone · 45,992 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Wall Street Wolverine @wallstwolverine · 177,736 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENRIQUE MORIS - Noticias” (@Enriquemorisoficial), 66,613 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Enriquemorisoficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.