Oportunidad si están buscando expandir su lista de exchanges! OKX está dando 8% sobre depósitos! Esto lo estaban haciendo para Europa siendo uno de los pocos exchanges con licencia pero acaban de extenderlo para LATAM! Aquí todos los detalles y para crear cuenta : https://www.okx.com/es-la/campaigns/bono-deposito-latam?channelId=1903712

Channel
MAD ALERTAS Y ANUNCIOS
@madcriptonews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,493subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001487147263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madcriptonews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madcriptonews |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 5,493 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 5,485 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 5,482 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 5,489 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 5,497 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 5,500 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 5,498 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 5,494 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 5,493 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 5,491 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 5,495 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 5,501 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 5,507 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 5,507 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 61.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Presta atención a este gráfico! La mayor oportunidad ahora? https://youtu.be/6ouO6s0-_cU
🔥3👍2❤1
🌙 CIERRE DEL DÍA: el rebote aguantó Bitcoin cerró el jueves arriba de los $60,000. Toda la sesión. Ahora en ~$61,500 (+2.6% en 24h), con un piso probado en $59,884 y un techo en $62,200 que todavía no rompe. No es poca cosa. Ayer el mercado tocó mínimos de casi dos años y el sentimiento estaba en pánico. Hoy el precio recuperó terreno y no lo soltó en todo el día. Tres datos de cierre: • ETH lideró (+6% en 24h, m…
❤2👍1
📚 TIP Correlación macro Te venden Bitcoin como el activo "descorrelacionado", el oro digital que se mueve solo. La realidad: hoy opera como activo de riesgo. Cuando la Fed suelta la palanca o insinúa que la inflación baja, sube. Cuando aprieta la liquidez, cae junto con las acciones. Eso es correlación macro, su beta al riesgo. Bitcoin no vive en su propia burbuja: respira al ritmo del banco central, igual que el Na…
🫡2❤1
🚨 BTC recupera los $60,000 tras la Fed Bitcoin rebotó arriba de los $60,000 (ahora ~$61.7K) y ETH lidera el rebote (~$1,700). ¿El detonante? No fue cripto. Fue Warsh, presidente de la Fed: dijo que los riesgos de inflación bajaron y tomó tono abierto con la IA. Con eso regresó el apetito por riesgo en todo el mercado. Hasta el oro subió. Pero aquí va la lectura honesta: No es "empezó el bull run". Es un rebote co…
🌙 Cierre del día Bitcoin tuvo un día de montaña rusa. En la mañana tocó los $57,800, coqueteando otra vez con los mínimos del año, y de ahí rebotó hasta $61,300 antes de acomodarse cerca de $59,750, arriba +2.6% en la jornada. El índice de miedo y codicia subió de 11 a 19: sigue en Miedo Extremo, pero por primera vez en días dejó de hundirse. Y mientras todos miramos el precio en el fondo, arriba se está peleando a…
❤2
📊 Peor mes de la historia para los ETF de Bitcoin. Pero antes de asustarte, lee esto. En junio salieron 4.06 mil millones de dólares de los ETF spot de Bitcoin. El peor mes desde que arrancaron en enero 2024. IBIT de BlackRock, el más grande, perdió unos 860 millones en una sola semana. La cara B que casi nadie está contando: • Los ETF de XRP sumaron 59.4 millones. Tercer mes seguido recibiendo dinero. • Los fond…
❤1
🌙 Cierre del día · 30 de junio Se acaba el mes, se acaba el trimestre... y mañana cambia el mapa en Europa. Así quedó la jornada: • BTC ~$58,200. Volvió a asomarse a los $60,000 durante el día y ahí mismo lo rechazaron. Segunda señal de que ese nivel dejó de ser piso. • Miedo Extremo clavado en 11, el más bajo de la semana. El mercado está genuinamente asustado. • Junio se despide como el peor mes de ETF spot en l…
📚 TIP Tasa de financiamiento (funding) En los futuros perpetuos, los largos y los cortos se pagan entre sí cada 8 horas. Eso es el funding. Cuando está muy positivo, demasiada gente apuesta a que sube y los largos pagan: euforia, zona peligrosa. Cuando se va negativo, los cortos pagan: todos apuestan a la caída, capitulación. Y cuando está pegado a cero, significa que el apalancamiento ya se limpió. No queda euforia…
🔴 ALERTA INSTITUCIONAL Hoy se cierra junio. Y con él, el peor mes en la historia de los ETF de Bitcoin. Los números del cierre de mes y de trimestre: • Los ETF spot de BTC cierran junio con récord histórico de salidas: 4,060 millones de dólares. Cerca del 75% salió del IBIT de BlackRock. • Bitcoin opera hoy en ~$58,350, después de un cierre semanal por debajo de los $60,000 que aguantaron todo 2026. • El Índice de…
🚨 Los gigantes acaban de declararle la guerra a Tether y Circle Hoy se anunció Open USD, una nueva stablecoin respaldada por un consorcio que impone respeto: • Visa, Mastercard, Stripe y BNY (pagos y banca) • BlackRock y Standard Chartered (las finanzas tradicionales) • Coinbase, Solana, OKX, Bybit y MetaMask (cripto) • Google y Shopify (tecnología) Más de 140 empresas en total. Al frente está Zach Abrams, el CEO …
❤4
🌆 Cierre del día Bitcoin pasó otra jornada clavado bajo los 60 mil dólares (~59,750), prácticamente plano. El miedo sigue en el fondo del ciclo: el índice de miedo y avaricia marca 15, en zona de miedo extremo. El telón de fondo: Junio se va como el peor mes en la historia de los fondos spot de Bitcoin, con más de 4 mil millones de dólares en salidas netas. El récord anterior ni se acercaba. Lo que viene esta sem…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @madcriptonews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿BTC cierra esta semana (domingo 5-jul) arriba o abajo de $60,000?
- Arriba de $60K 🟢44%
- Abajo de $60K 🔴35%
- Se desploma bajo $55K 🩸21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@madcriptonews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Enriquemorisoficial · 66,613
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MAD ALERTAS Y ANUNCIOS” (@madcriptonews), 5,493 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madcriptonews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.