Channel
Iceuve Cripto Club
@iceuveclub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,160subscribers
-119 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001816752540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iceuveclub |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iceuveclub |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:39 | 3,160 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:50 | 3,164 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 3,178 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 3,179 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 3,180 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 3,184 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 3,188 | +6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 3,182 | -7 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 3,189 | -11 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 3,200 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 3,222 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 3,224 | -13 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:28 | 3,237 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 3,237 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 3,241 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 3,249 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 3,252 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 3,253 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 3,256 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 3,261 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@theladymarket · 30,670
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@ladymarkettrades · 20,936
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@GRANMAGOFICIAL · 21,359
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@bolsazonefreezone · 47,121
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@lasgangasdeandrea · 25,358
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
@PabloGilTraderOficial · 49,960
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,574
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@StarkPrivacy · 19,803
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
@Enriquemorisoficial · 66,055
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Iceuve Cripto Club” (@iceuveclub), 3,160 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iceuveclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.