Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trenches

Channel

Trenches

@trenches

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,919subscribers

-2,276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003551630922
TypeChannel
Usernames@trenches @trenching
Created26 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/trenches

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9194,1963,057.56 August 2026 — 4,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,196 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,920 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,912 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,916 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,902 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,831 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,802 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,778 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,562 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,513 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,472 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,430 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,392 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,345 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,320 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,294 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,289 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,186 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,133 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,036 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,025 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,919 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2,276. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,577–4,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 16:201,919-106
17 Sept 2026, 05:592,025-11
16 Sept 2026, 03:012,036-97
13 Sept 2026, 09:212,133-53
11 Sept 2026, 23:182,186-103
9 Sept 2026, 02:572,289-5
7 Sept 2026, 18:382,294-26
3 Sept 2026, 09:362,320-25
2 Sept 2026, 10:472,345-47
31 Aug 2026, 09:492,392-6
30 Aug 2026, 17:372,398-32
28 Aug 2026, 15:032,430-29
28 Aug 2026, 04:082,459-12
26 Aug 2026, 01:372,471-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:152,472-41
22 Aug 2026, 16:542,513-49
21 Aug 2026, 04:482,562-216
19 Aug 2026, 16:562,778-24
18 Aug 2026, 09:142,802-29
16 Aug 2026, 18:532,831first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

434 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19945.9%
👍8218.9%
🔥398.99%
🤯225.07%
💯184.15%
🫡184.15%
🤔102.30%
😢92.07%
😁81.84%
🤩81.84%
💘61.38%
🤝61.38%
😱40.922%
💔30.691%
🤬20.461%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC≈4,410 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The trenches are BACK. Trust your gut, pray to god and keep bull posting your bags fam Don't underestimate $ANSEM. A lot of people are saying it's topped but I can see it running to a billy ez if Bitcoin continues rising I'll shill some new low caps soon, looking for good entries

👍28❤19

9 May 2026, 12:47 UTC≈5,730 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$MAXXING hit $8M a few hours ago. That's almost 3x from our entry Finally locked in a lot of profit today after diamond handing this for a minute. Still holding a small moonbag but I'm mostly out boys Memes are heating up... plenty of printers coming, will post a fresh call soon for a low cap. Keep your notifications on Btw calls never get edited or deleted here. We keep it real in the @trenches

❤16🔥5👍4

4 Mar 2026, 14:00 UTC≈11,100 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$PIGEON currently 50% UP since our post 2 hours ago ($1.6M rn) Took out half our capital. Now letting the rest ride

❤30🔥12🤩8

4 Mar 2026, 12:05 UTC≈10,600 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A couple of small-cap memes I have in my pumpfolio $PIGEON ($1.1M mc) GB8KtQfMChhYrCYtd5PoAB42kAdkHnuyAincSSmFpump $MAXXING ($2.8M mc) 32CdQdBUxbCsLy5AUHWmyidfwhgGUr9N573NBUrDpump Even though it’s the lower market cap, I’d actually say $PIGEON feels like the safer play of the two. If Bitcoin keeps pushing this mini uptrend, I could easily see either of these going on a serious run Dyor, just sharing for fun!

❤42💯9👍8

4 Mar 2026, 09:58 UTC≈7,690 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

WE'RE SO BACK Bitcoin $71k

🤔7👍6❤5

26 Feb 2026, 19:23 UTC≈6,820 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Mathematical proof that the trenches got nuked over the last 12 months: There's 95% less memecoin traders compared to 1 year ago Will the trenches come back?

😢9👍3🤔3

25 Feb 2026, 19:56 UTC≈5,350 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is back at $69k Feed the trenches

👍8❤7💔3

16 Feb 2026, 15:07 UTC≈4,660 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I’ve been stacking OG’s this last month: @based @billionaire @hopium @mogger @trenches @trenching $90k spent so far But I’m a madman still looking for more premium handles. If you’re sitting on something RARE you wanna sell then dm me. Must be either crypto related or culture heavy

🤯13❤8🤝6

14 Feb 2026, 20:36 UTC≈4,230 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You can be broke at 38 and then on the Forbes rich list by age 40. It’s never too late

❤6👍5💘3

14 Feb 2026, 13:59 UTC≈4,330 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Trading and life in general are very similar. Nobody is coming to save your bags

👍6❤5💘2

12 Feb 2026, 18:00 UTC≈4,680 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

No one is an atheist when their coins are 80% down

❤11💯9🤬2

7 Feb 2026, 17:40 UTC≈4,620 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁8❤5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trenches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trenches” (@trenches), 1,919 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trenches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.