Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoManul

@cryptomanul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,404subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721500512
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomanul
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptomanul

Growth

4,4044,4114,407.56 August 2026 — 4,409 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,409 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,411 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,404 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,403–4,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:334,404-7
9 Aug 2026, 07:544,411+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:454,409no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:344,409first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 4,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total23,385
Reactions total250
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁12148.4%
4919.6%
👍208.00%
🔥187.20%
🌭124.80%
🍌124.80%
👌124.80%
👏20.8%
🕊20.8%
😢20.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptomanul. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC772 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ни одного человека в крипте не знаю кто на такое способен гештальт детства закрыт, не всем дано понять что за этим стоит...

🔥11😁2

5 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC890 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

$5000 за пару минут Лучший лудо-смарт мув сейчас это дуельбет. Ребята готовы заплатить 5к зела за биг вин, все просто: Регистрация на дуельбете Вкладка "promotions" Выбирайте доступный слот где платят 5к за биг вин и ехала То есть выиграл дохуя+получил дохуя сверху когда у меня лудка, делаю это исключительно тут

😁204🌭2

4 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC970 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Китайцы сжигаю по 300к$ в день на лудке ради будущего дропа Это либо 100+ выход и самый жесткий с4 либо файнл мани дрейн от бенза с выходом ниже сейла. Бенз красавчик, дай бог мне здоровья

4 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC≈1,150 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продам айфон 17 про макс на 512 гб с установлением телеграммом 4000$

😁171

2 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,260 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сэкономить=заработать, фри 15$ для всех козачков из Украины Создал себе еще одну карту Allience, кент заманил на свою рефку теперь я рассказываю вам: 1)Регаем стартовую карту за 5 минут(обязательно по рефке чтоб активировать бонус) 2)Получаем 200 грн и 30% кэшбек на любую покупку(суммарный кэшбек 30% до 500 грн потом 1%) 3)Кайфуем и заводим семью по рефке То есть пошли вы в атб купили бананов и колы на 1к, 300 пол

😁6

30 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,210 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подался на вип трансфер, ребята трастовые

3😁3😢2

30 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC822 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @highrollers_xyzPhoto

🔥 HighRollers VIP x REELS $10,000 WELCOME BONUS · $5,000,000 TOTAL GIVEAWAY Мы рады объявить о запуске совместной акции с партнёрами Reels — бонус $10,000 для всех, кто переходит играть на платформу Reels. Кому подходит: Если у вас солидные объёмы в: ▪ DEX / CEX трейдинг ▪ Polymarket ▪ Казино или БК ▪ CS:GO кейсы и другие гемблинг площадки Как получить: Подайте заявку на Vip-Transfer 👉 Highrollers.club ⚠️ Примем

30 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,150 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Господи как же оно прет Вчера пофлипал арк чейн да так что все средства нахуй заблокировали, потом вспомнил про бонусы на дуельбете Сумарно 500% бонус к депу и 500 фриспинов на ход ноги. Так еще и бонус здраво выдал, ртпха реально рабочая Инста деп вывод все дела, короче все для лудиков только на дуельбете.

😁20🍌43👍2🕊2🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,160 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что джесси что адам два вафледрона которые нихуя не сделали кроме как хуже. Пока, скучать не буду, надеюсь на твое место возьмут кого то нормального

👍6🍌1

29 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 8 August 2026

Как я понял дают больше если твиттер акк вкачан, кент на пустышку сделал дали 1$ так что если есть норм акки юзайте их или купите где то, я свои 5$ забрал дальше ебитесь сами

29 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,280 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

5-200$ от Paybox абсолютно бесплатно у мунпея вышел свой аи агент который позволяет управлять кошельком с помощью ИИ-пост Дают бонус за регистрацию от 5-200$(по твиттеру смотрел) в зависимости от вашего акка Calude/Chat gpt. Как я понял дают больше тем кто покупал подписки на данные аишки, как залутать бабки: -переходим сюда -регаемся через чат гпт/клауд + твиттер -забираем лаве -так же в самом чате/клауде нужно д

5👍2🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,040 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пацаны перейдите по ссылке мне с вас спинчики дадут хочу в магаз сходить на вырученные деньги 4$ минимум падает с затратами 1$ так что жб темка https://www.binance.com/activity/chance/bstocks-ua-100kk?ref=176169230

🌭9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptomanul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 555,412 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoManul” (@cryptomanul), 4,404 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomanul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.