Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gentleman's Chronicles

@GentleChron

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,000subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364545311
TypeChannel
Username@GentleChron
DescriptionЗачем много писать, когда нужно много работать? ✏️Admin - @TheGentIeman Менеджер - @TianessRies Второй канал - https://t.me/starknet_spasibo Маркетинг - https://t.me/Gentlemans_Agency
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GentleChron

Growth

17,00017,04717,023.57 August 2026 — 17,047 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,039 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,031 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,018 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,012 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,000 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,993–17,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:3317,000-4
11 Aug 2026, 13:1217,004-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:4517,012-6
9 Aug 2026, 11:5417,018-13
8 Aug 2026, 13:4117,031-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:0417,039-8
7 Aug 2026, 03:4617,047first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 17,000 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,930
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held24 (21 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total66,760
Reactions total804
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,200
Videos
19
Links
2,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,189 reactions across 24 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍40634.1%
33828.4%
🍌16113.5%
🦄13511.4%
🔥715.97%
🌚181.51%
🤔151.26%
🤝80.673%
60.505%
50.421%
🎄50.421%
💯50.421%
🤓50.421%
👀40.336%
🤯40.336%
20.168%
😈10.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
95
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 24 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GentleChron. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈2,600 views43 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

😊 Роботы должны работать за нас, а тут наоборот К вашему вниманию новый, супер-технологичный проект - Axis Robotics. Потыкал его ночью, даже понравилось. Можно запускать стримы на твиче, как я пытаюсь положить нож или чеснок на доску, небольшой ускоренный ролик я приложил вместо превью. В начале очень нервировало) Это AI/robotics-стартап, который строит базу для создания обучающих данных для физических роботов. Мы

👍286🤝42🍌2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈2,890 views37 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Что же там по нашей любимой крипте и проектам 🤭 OneFootball - небольшой праздник, можно забрать третью партию дропа от проекта - claim. Вроде и мелочь, а на таком рынке приятно. Правда, у некоторых наблюдаются проблемы с клеймом. 😚 X - базовая монетизация за ИИ-слов - ВСЁ. 18-го Сентября ей на смену придёт Original Content Rewards Program. Теперь деньги начисляются за qualified impressions - уникальные просмотры

👍219🍌5🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,670 views39 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Запустились, какие мысли по сейлу: 🍒 Раз уже начал делать обзор, то доведу всё до логичного конца. Только недавно запустили тестнет, сейчас вот уже проводят сейл. За их систему сейла ITTC писал ранее, если впервые читаете - чекните. Стартовая оценка около $15M, верхняя примерно $62M. В момент написания поста она около $19.85M. То есть ранний участник получает более привлекательную цену, чем тот, кто зайдёт ближе

🍌1412👍6🤔3🌚2🔥1🤓1

7 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,870 views35 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😜 В список технологий затесался старый чужак В мой списочек из двух проектов можно смело добавить ещё один. Я когда его чекал, он мне что-то напоминал, пока я не вбил названия проекта в поиск по каналу и оказывается, о нём был пост в бородатом 2024 году. Это Pond. Раньше это был модальный AI блокчейн, сейчас это agentic task marketplace, если проще, они вклиниваются в цепочку заказчик → Pond → подходящий человек и

👍20🍌7🔥4💯31

6 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,810 views32 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😏 Больше деталей по фарму Velvet 🍇 Кто пропустил, это апдейт первого поста, в котором я делал обзор на фарм GEMs от Velvet. Проект не No Name, должен быть вам знаком и так. да и деньги у них есть, судя по ревардам. Во-первых, сразу скажу, что осталось мало времени, эта эпоха заканчивается 10-го августа, за неё раздадут почти 1M$, Поэтому отпишу пару выводов, который я сделал за эти дни: Дешевле всего вышло фармит

15👍6🍌5🤯3🤔2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈3,180 views33 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Что там у нас по крипту - держу в курcе:: 🥹 DappOs - проверяйте кошелек на Airdrop Boxes, если успели пройти регистрацию - checker. Видел скрины раздали, там не сильно много, но неожиданно. Вот инфа за токен. 😶‍🌫️ Arc - вышел апдейт от команды. Mainnet их L1-stable блокчейна запланирован на 16-у Сентября. на всякий случай, уточняю для всех. Да, это L1, Но газовый токен у него будет USDC, а значит, Mainnet не равн

👍187🍌3🔥3🌚2

5 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈3,170 views29 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Обзор на ITTC Sale от StripChain 🍒 Недавно запустится ITTC - Inverse Time Train Community от проекта StripChain, первый пост о котором был тут. Главная идея такого сейла в том, чтобы перевернуть стандартную модель распределения, в которой фонды получают больше токенов и покупают их дешевле, а комьюнити заходит позже и по более высокой оценке. Продажа проходит через 30 стадий по bonding curve: 🟢стартовая оценка:

🍌128👍42🎄2🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈4,250 views53 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

😱 Высокие технологии, которые могут покормить Спасибо за реакции. Закидываю вам новый разбор двух проектов, которые пополнили мой список отработки. Так как платных проектов хватает, спасибо перпам, которые очень активно высасывают ликву, упор у меня на малозатратные или вообще бесплатные проекты, например: 🙂 Savior Of Health - довольно странный концепт у проекта: Survey-to-Earn - они собирают данные, чтобы потом та

27👍17🤔4🍌3💯2

1 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈3,860 views32 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😏 Кампания с пулом в 1M$ 🍇 Помню, ещё в ноябре 2025 писал о кампании Velvet Gems, в котором поделить пул в токенах VELVET можно было фармом Gems через ончейн актив у них на платформе. Хотя почему можно было? И сейчас можно. Чуть больше недели назад запустилась Epoch 11 этой кампании, в которой участники поделят пул в 2,710,049 в токенах VELVET или 1M$ по текущему курсу. Эта эпоха будет идти до 10-го августа. Механ

👍15🍌85🌚3🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈3,890 views58 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Крипта как дела? Держу в курсе: 🥲 Base - искренни не понимаю тряску вокруг недавнего релиза Base Onchain Verify, о которой все знали, но тут оно в тестнете вышло и всё. Главное не забыть отработать данную активность в тестнете, вдруг насыпка будет. 🥹 DappOs - давно забытый нами проект, о котором был даже отдельный пост выкатил чекер дропа - register. Нужно привязать твиттер и кошелек. Я честно говоря вообще не то

👍3510🍌8🔥41

29 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈4,340 views38 reactions14 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🗑 Мы стали забывать о RWA 🥥 Наверное последний раз это часто упоминалось с Plume, когда мы его делали, и после этого многие похоронили это как сектор, но по факту, RWA всё глубже вплетается в крипту, если конкретно, то через токенизация акций & ETF. Уже не стыдно помимо обзор BTC/ETH/ALTs делать обзоры золота, серебра или простых акций, Sandisk к примеру. Поэтому есть смысл наблюдать за теми, кто уже активно строит

15👍12🍌6🔥32

24 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC≈5,380 views56 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Что там по крипте и что можно забрать: 🥰 Cambria - если вы были активны где-либо: Abstract, Cambria, Elsa, Minara, Polymarket, Based и ещё куча даппок - проверьте свой кошелек на дроп сундучков. Не факт. но вдруг чисто за них что-то будет, считайте это вампирской атакой. Делитесь что у вас, я выбил 18 сундуков, есть легендарка. 🫤 Grass- в этот раз без отдельного поста, думаю, всем пофиг. Вчера открыли клейм - заб

🍌2315🔥5🤝4👍3🌚21🎄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @GentleChron. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 51,387 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gentleman's Chronicles” (@GentleChron), 17,000 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GentleChron.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.