Channel
@Coinlocally
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
72,873subscribers
-333 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001484905779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Coinlocally |
| Description | 🌐Your gateway to next-gen crypto trading 📈 Spot • Futures • Copy Trading 🎁 Rewards, Launchpad, and more 🔐 Safe, fast, and user-friendly 🌍 https://linktr.ee/coinlocally.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Coinlocally |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 72,873 | -96 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 72,969 | -66 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 73,035 | -65 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 73,100 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 73,124 | -51 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 73,175 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 73,198 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 73,206 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 June 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 620 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
69 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 71.0% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 2.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Official Platform Upgrade Announcement Dear Valued Users, We sincerely appreciate your patience, trust, and understanding throughout this period. We also apologize for the inconvenience caused by the delay. As part of our long-term commitment to security, service quality, and sustainable growth, we have completely upgraded our platform infrastructure to provide a safer, more stable, and reliable experience for a…
❤11🕊4🤩4🙉2
🅱️US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $4.5 billion in net outflows during June, marking the largest monthly withdrawal since their launch. Year-to-date net outflows have now reached approximately $5.5 billion, while total Bitcoin holdings across these funds have declined below 1.25 million BTC, reflecting weaker institutional demand. 🔽The sharp ETF outflows significantly exceeded the size of the recently announced $1.25…
❤3🕊2
🔺💸Bitcoin Faces Pressure as Dollar Strengthens Against Yen 🏦Bitcoin came under renewed selling pressure as the US dollar reached its highest level against the Japanese yen since 1986. At the same time, on-chain data shows that many investors who bought BTC near its recent highs are selling at a loss, with exchange inflows increasing significantly. 🟩The data suggests that long-term holders who entered at higher pric…
❤2
💰Bitmine Expands Ether Holdings to 5.7M ETH 💼Bitmine has acquired over 27,000 ETH worth approximately $43 million, increasing its total holdings to 5.7 million ETH, equivalent to about 4.7% of Ethereum's circulating supply. 📈The company was also added to the Russell 1000 Index, a milestone that could increase institutional investor exposure to its stock.
🏳Strategy Introduces New Capital Framework for Bitcoin Treasury 💰Strategy has unveiled a new capital management framework that allows the company to sell part of its Bitcoin holdings, if needed, to fund dividends, strengthen cash reserves, and repurchase shares. 🛒The company also increased its cash reserve to $2.55 billion and confirmed that it made no new Bitcoin purchases last week. Its total Bitcoin holdings rem…
📈Top Gainers of the Week on Coinlocally This week brought some impressive moves across the market, with one token leading the pack by a huge margin. Here are this week's top performers on Coinlocally: 🥇VELVET — +275% 🥈DEXE — +41% 🥉JTO — +27% 4️⃣AAVE — +20% 5️⃣AVAX — +5% The crypto market never stops creating opportunities. Stay informed, trade responsibly, and keep an eye on the next breakout. 🚀Trade hundreds of …
🐂Analyst Suggests Strategy Sell Part of Its Bitcoin Holdings 💸A market analyst has suggested that Strategy sell around $3 billion worth of its Bitcoin holdings to strengthen liquidity and improve investor confidence. ✅However, other analysts argue that the company does not need to sell its Bitcoin, as it has alternative financial tools available to manage its obligations and support its capital structure.
🎩Sharplink Acquires $62.4M Worth of Ether in Three Days 🛒Sharplink has resumed its Ether accumulation strategy after an eight-month pause, purchasing 39,196 ETH worth approximately $62.4 million over the past three days. 💶The latest purchases reinforce the company's long-term ETH accumulation strategy and come alongside efforts to support broader institutional adoption of the Ethereum ecosystem.
🪙More than 37,000 ETH from wallets that had remained dormant for nearly eight years became active, with a significant portion sold, adding fresh supply to the market. 🐋Meanwhile, onchain data shows that long-term Ethereum whales have fallen into unrealized losses for the first time since 2019. Despite this, some large investors continue accumulating ETH, highlighting mixed sentiment among major holders.
🥰1
💎Strategy purchased 520 Bitcoin worth approximately $34.9 million between June 15 and June 22, increasing its total holdings to 847,363 BTC. 📈At the same time, the company added $300 million to its US dollar reserve, bringing the total reserve to $1.4 billion. The funding was raised through the sale of company shares.
❤5
📈Top Gainers of the Week on Coinlocally Another week, another batch of strong movers across the market. 🏆This week's top performers: 🥇Aerodrome Finance (AERO) — +35% 🥈Uniswap (UNI) — +15% 🥉Jupiter (JUP) — +14% 4️⃣Ethena (ENA) — +13% 5️⃣Stellar (XLM) — +10% Big moves, strong momentum, and plenty of opportunities for active traders. Trade them all now on Coinlocally
❤3🥰2
✖️XRP has declined more than 45% over the past year, erasing most of the gains recorded during the 2024–2025 market cycle. 🪙After reaching an all-time high of $3.65 in July last year, the asset is now trading around $1.14. Meanwhile, ongoing macroeconomic pressures and increased uncertainty across global markets continue to weigh on the broader cryptocurrency market, impacting the performance of many altcoins.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Coinlocally. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 238,049 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coinlocally Community” (@Coinlocally), 72,873 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coinlocally.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.