به نظرم طلا خریدنیست👍

Channel
imanhosseini_finance
@imanhosseinif
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,654subscribers
-434 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001392431601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imanhosseinif |
| Description | تمام مطالب نظرات شخصی هست به هیچ عنوان مبنای تصمیم گیری و خرید و فروش قرار نگیرد! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imanhosseinif |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 07:35 | 6,654 | -34 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 6,688 | -38 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:36 | 6,726 | -31 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:51 | 6,757 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 6,771 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 6,772 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 6,776 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 6,788 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 6,795 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 6,805 | +17 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 6,788 | -16 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 6,804 | -34 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 6,838 | -17 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 6,855 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 6,875 | -31 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 6,906 | -16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 6,922 | -32 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 6,954 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 6,980 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 6,991 | first reading |
Engagement
135 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.42%
- avg views ÷ 6,654 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 494
- 97 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.52%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 97
- of 135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 97 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (27 July 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 47,916 |
| Reactions total | 727 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,490
- Videos
- ≈50
- Links
- ≈179
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 52s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,591 reactions across 132 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,084 | 68.1% | |
| 👍 | 216 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 96 | 6.03% | |
| 😁 | 63 | 3.96% | |
| 😢 | 42 | 2.64% | |
| 👌 | 41 | 2.58% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 1.13% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 0.88% | |
| 😈 | 7 | 0.44% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.314% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.189% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.126% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 97 posts held from the last 30 days (3.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳ترامپ، پوتین و شی پنجشنبه ۲۸ آبان توی چین نشست سهجانبه برگزار میکنن؛ محور اصلی این گفتوگوی سهجانبه، مذاکره درباره کنترل تسلیحات هستهای، موضوع کره شمالی و جنگ ایران عنوان شده. ✔️یک میز برای تعیین و تکلیف سه چیز : ایران اوکراین تایوان
❤3👍1
✔️ تحلیل طلا ۱۸ عیار ❗️طلا یک بار به اردر بلاک از پیش تعیین شده خورد و واکنش داد ... با تایید به صورت پله ای میتونید تو این ناحیه قیمتی مشخص شده خرید کنید به تارگت ۲۹ تا ۳۰ میلیون
این عکس رو به همراه پرامپت زیر به چتجیپیتی بدید. Fill this envelope with a personal letter based on everything you know about me اگر دوست داشتی با ما از طریق آی دی پشتیبان به اشتراک بزار ✉️ @safesignalfx
👌2
💭 گاهی ترید کردن یعنی با وجود تمام خستگیها، دوباره پشت چارت بشینی و به مسیری که انتخاب کردی ایمان داشته باشی... یعنی روزهایی که بازار بهت لبخند نمیزنه، خودت رو نبازی. ضرر کنی، یاد بگیری، بلند بشی و دوباره ادامه بدی. هیچکس شبهایی که با فکر معاملاتت بیدار موندی، روزهایی که به خودت شک کردی و لحظههایی که از صفر شروع کردی رو نمیبینه. آروم، منظم و بیوقفه ادامه بده؛ هنوز بهترین روزهای معاملاتیات رو تجربه نکردی. …
❤9
✔️ ویدیو لایو ترید پنجشنبه به صورت کامل 🔗https://youtu.be/xA5N4Zu0a4c?si=qqsNHejvm4Zv0dCL
❤1
برایند ۴ هفته گذشته vip ❗️ منتظر بلک فراییدی هستید دیگه؟🎯
❤7
🥇 برایند هفته گذشته کانال: ✅دوشنبه: ۲ معامله → ۲ ریوارد منفی -190 pip ✅ سهشنبه: ۲ معامله →۶ ریوارد مثبت +600 pip ✅چهارشنبه: ۲ معامله → ۴ ریوارد مثبت +330 pip ✅ پنجشنبه: ۳ معامله → ۱ ریوارد مثبت +170 pip ✅ جمعه: ۱ معامله → ۱ریوارد منفی -120 pip 🔥 برآیند هفته 💰 برآیند کلی: ۸ ریوارد مثبت +790 PIP 📈🔼
❤3
🥇 برایند هفته گذشته کانال: ✅دوشنبه: ۲ معامله → ۲ ریوارد منفی -200 pip ✅ سهشنبه: ۲ معامله →۶ ریوارد مثبت +430 pip ✅چهارشنبه: ۳ معامله → ۴ ریوارد مثبت +420 pip ✅ پنجشنبه: ۳ معامله →۲ ریوارد مثبت +220Pip ✅ جمعه: ۳ معامله → ۱ریوارد مثبت +140Pip 🔥 برآیند هفته 💰 برآیند کلی: ۱۰ ریوارد +1010 📈🔼
❤1
🥇 برایند هفته گذشته کانال: ✅دوشنبه: ۳ معامله → ۳ ریوارد منفی -270 pip ✅ سهشنبه: ۳ معامله →۵ ریوارد مثبت +990 pip ✅چهارشنبه: ۱ معامله → ۳ ریوارد مثبت +360 pip ✅ پنجشنبه: ۲ معامله →۰ ریوارد ✅ جمعه: ۱ معامله → ۳ ریوارد مثبت +300pip 🔥 برآیند هفته 💰 برآیند کلی: ۸ ریوارد +1380 PIP 📈🔼
❤4
🥇 برآیند هفته گذشته کانال: ✅دوشنبه: ۱ معامله → ۳ ریوارد مثبت +300 pip ✅ سهشنبه: ۱ معامله → ۳ ریوارد مثبت +270 pip ✅چهارشنبه: ۱ معامله → ۰ ریوارد (risk free) ✅ پنجشنبه: ۲ معامله → ۲ ریوارد مثبت +330 pip ✅ جمعه: ۱ معامله → ۳ریوارد مثبت +240 pip 🔥 برآیند هفته 💰 برآیند کلی: ۱۱ ریوارد مثبت +1170 PIP 📈🔼
❤5
اول صبح ما فعلا اینطوری شروع شد🎯
🕊3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @imanhosseinif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شما چه سبک سیگنالی رو میپسندید؟
- اسکلپی با استاپ کوچک و گِین کمتر 🤏72%
- سویینگی با استاپ بزرگتر و گِین بیشتر🤌32%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
پراپ ترید میکنید یا ریل؟
- پراپ67%
- ریل38%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
هفته پیش سود کردید یا ضرر؟❤️
- سود کردم!😁32%
- ضرر کردم🥲71%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arfandxcrypto · 34,036
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
@TrustTraade · 100,586
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
@cryptosdo · 289,155
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
@solevrage11 · 53,423
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@ecoline · 15,996
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
@binamtrade_arz · 63,140
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
@Sinabit_I · 24,233
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
@tradingprofessorchannel · 72,804
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@sakhtineh · 23,583
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
@BeziTrade · 21,826
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
@Coinlocally · 63,795
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@bulling_trade · 17,838
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
@signalypto · 24,138
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 September 2026
@wolfoftrading_support · 65,448
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@hadihajisoltani14 · 29,773
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
@KomeilToloueei_G · 47,059
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
@crypto_amookashani · 93,435
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
@amiirforex1 · 59,751
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@hesam_mirzade · 35,742
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@javadtrade11 · 226,271
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@GoldSignalBtc · 267,649
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
@ChartsPrice · 79,320
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@money_tribe · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
@bitgroot · 247,940
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“imanhosseini_finance” (@imanhosseinif), 6,654 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imanhosseinif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.