Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Репич

Channel

Репич

@repich_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,185subscribers

+317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001898810855
TypeChannel
Username@repich_tg
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/repich_tg

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8687,1857,026.57 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,870 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,880 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,894 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,902 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,015 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,033 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,044 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,056 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,057 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,107 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,129 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,151 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,154 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,159 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,157 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,164 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,166 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,173 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,181 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,179 subscribers12 November 2026 — 7,185 subscribers7 August 202612 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net +317. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,820–7,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:377,185+6
8 Nov 2026, 14:487,179-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:177,181+8
2 Nov 2026, 12:477,173+7
30 Oct 2026, 02:487,166+2
26 Oct 2026, 20:277,164+7
24 Oct 2026, 03:207,157-2
20 Oct 2026, 20:177,159+5
18 Oct 2026, 01:087,154+3
11 Oct 2026, 09:567,151+22
4 Oct 2026, 19:567,129+22
25 Sept 2026, 14:187,107+50
14 Sept 2026, 23:217,057+1
11 Sept 2026, 04:187,056+12
5 Sept 2026, 23:597,044+11
1 Sept 2026, 19:087,033+18
29 Aug 2026, 21:347,015+34
26 Aug 2026, 10:536,981+39
23 Aug 2026, 20:036,942+30
20 Aug 2026, 13:186,912first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 7,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held38 (24 July 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total2,430
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,415 reactions across 38 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 530098950306060386476322.3%
🔥57216.7%
❤48114.1%
😁45813.4%
👍2386.97%
custom 53010860968750907522086.09%
🥰1012.96%
😭942.75%
🍓912.66%
👀591.73%
😈541.58%
❤‍🔥471.38%
👏451.32%
🍾411.20%
💯260.761%
🤔260.761%
😱230.673%
🦄200.586%
🎉160.469%
🌚120.351%
12 further kinds401.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,430 views95 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Тривиальные названия веществ порой кажутся нам совершенно нелогичными, но на самом деле многие из них связаны со свойствами соединений, их внешним видом или сходством с чем-то другим. Давайте разберем несколько интересных примеров 💡 Если хотите подготовиться к ЕГЭ или ОГЭ по химии – переходите в Лабораторию Репича 🧪

🔥67custom 530098950306060386417🥰9🤨2

6 Oct 2026, 19:55 UTC≈4,110 views184 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вот и думайте)

custom 5300989503060603864126❤36🔥13🥰9

2 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC≈5,300 views165 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Сегодня отмечается Всемирный день без алкоголя и День выдержанного в бочках пива. Поэтому в синтезах, где в качестве растворителя используется этанол, придется заменить его темным нефильтрованным 😁

custom 530098950306060386495🍾37😁21🎉12

1 Oct 2026, 12:55 UTC≈4,950 views74 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Это вторая часть про аллотропные модификации! 💎 Если хотите подготовиться к ЕГЭ или ОГЭ по химии – переходите в Лабораторию Репича 🧪

custom 530098950306060386438🔥23❤‍🔥7👍6

28 Sept 2026, 20:17 UTC≈4,960 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

А вот вопросики для самых умных 🤔 1) Почему образуется именно пара-замещенный продукт? 2) Почему для синтеза не требуется катализатор в виде FeBr₃?

🥰30🤔14❤2🆒2

28 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC≈4,580 views65 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как не откинуться от бромоводорода 😣 При работе в лаборатории органической химии периодически приходится сталкиваться с выделением довольно токсичных газов. К примеру, на прикрепленной фотографии вы можете увидеть реакцию, в которой бромируется ацетанилид 🧪 Этот синтез интересен тем, что протекает в ледяной уксусной кислоте, то есть практически безводной и очень концентрированной. Получившийся пара-бромацетанилид р…

👀36🔥19🥰6custom 53009895030606038644

27 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,340 views147 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Сны при температуре 40 градусов 🐸

custom 5300989503060603864100❤38🤩7😱2

19 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,070 views57 reactionsread 20 August 2026

💥 👨‍🔬 📖 20.08.2026 12:00 по МСК

custom 530098950306060386439🔥13❤‍🔥3🤡2

18 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC≈1,570 views74 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ыыых, финальную песню "Не забывай", которая звучит в роликах, начали отслеживать по авторским правам ((( В будущем это может вызвать проблемки, если владелец решит убрать свободное использование, поэтому в следующих роликах придется ее на что-то заменить. У кого тут хороший музыкальный вкус, есть на примете что-то? 🤔 UPD: Продублирую комментарий Может есть среди аудитории исполнительница, которая будет готова сдела…

😭68🥰3👏2👀1

18 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,650 views56 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Перед вами колба, в которой очень долго при температуре 140 градусов по Цельсию варилась щелочь 😭 Вообще, лабораторные колбы из обычного боросиликатного стекла к щелочам относительно устойчивы, однако, не в том случае, когда вам нужно устроить длительный жесткий щелочной гидролиз какой-нибудь особо стойкой органики 😬 Потихоньку при сильном нагревании щелочь может проедать стекло, образуя силикаты. Поэтому через час…

❤27😭17🔥8🤯4

17 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC≈1,840 views127 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ну, Репич, как тебе сказать, что будет... Думаю, сам догадаешься... 😬

😁92😱18👀10❤7

17 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,810 views66 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Чем больше дырок на химическом халате, тем надежнее его защита, но это не точно 🔥 Классическая версия нитрирующей смеси (кислотного меланжа) – это смесь из концентрированной азотной и серной кислоты. Азотная кислота позволяет ввести в органический реактив нитрогруппу (-NO₂), а серная эффективно связывает малейшие количества воды и параллельно работает как катализатор 🧪 Обычно в методиках синтеза пишут, что реакцион…

❤47custom 530098950306060386411🤔5🫡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @repich_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 24,889
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Репич” (@repich_tg), 7,185 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repich_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.