Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

گده دن زهلم گئدیر

@gadadan

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54,073subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003922262
TypeChannel
Username@gadadan
Description" اولین طنز پرداز مجازی در آذربایجان " فقط ارسال سوژه وسفارش تبلیغات (عکس،کلیپ،وویس،جوک و....) @reklam_z
Created6 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gadadan

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “گَده دَن زَهلم گِئدیر — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

54,07354,13254,102.55 August 2026 — 54,132 subscribers6 August 2026 — 54,130 subscribers6 August 2026 — 54,130 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,118 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,108 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,095 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,085 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,073 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,064–54,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1154,073-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:2854,085-10
10 Aug 2026, 00:3154,095-13
8 Aug 2026, 23:0154,108-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:0654,113-5
7 Aug 2026, 01:5854,118-12
6 Aug 2026, 01:4554,130no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4554,130-2
5 Aug 2026, 22:2154,132first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 54,073 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,170
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held63 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total451,410
Reactions total7,401
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
33,400
Videos
15,100
Links
1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,401 reactions across 63 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,83951.9%
👍1,45419.6%
💔6088.22%
👏5677.66%
🤬4335.85%
😢2723.68%
❤‍🔥1421.92%
😱861.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC719 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

از لحاظ روحی نیازمند اون روزیم که هرکی بهم زنگ میزنه ازم بپرسه،الان اونجا ساعت چنده؟ @gadadan

👍19🤬2

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,340 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

یک طرفه عشق عکس اولسِیدی @gadadan

💔45👍3

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,620 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

من فقط عاشق اون قسمت از مهمونی هستم که مهمونا خداحافظی میکنن میرن @gadadan

👍37😁11👏2

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,720 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠ این روزها اسم آمپول‌های لاغری ( مثل مونجارو ) زیاد به گوشمون می‌خوره؛ اما این روش درمانی برای همه مناسب نیست و میتونه عوارض خطرناکی داشته باشه ! پرسشنامه زیر توسط جمعی از پزشکان متخصص غدد و تغذیه تهیه شده تا شما با پاسخ به چندسؤال کوتاه در کمتر از یک دقیقه متوجه بشین آیا تزریق آمپول لاغری برای شما توصیه می‌شه یا نه. 🟢 شروع ارزیابی

👍3

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,500 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

مناسب شورت او اوغلانلاراکی تزتز کوسولَر @gadadan

😁66👍10🤬4😱3👏1

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈3,730 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

فکت @gadadan

😁48👏2😱2

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈4,390 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

آقای کریس رونالدو ۲ گون دوزیدین صفر آیی چیخِیدی سورا @gadadan

😁134😢4❤‍🔥2👍2😱1

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈4,370 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یه دوست دختر داشتم یه روز بهم گفت رئیسم بهم پیشنهاد دوستی داده، باید بهم بزنیم یعنی سبک جدیدی در صداقت و خیانت رو همزمان با هم ابدا کرد @gadadan

😁62🤬14😱1

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈4,540 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

معرفی الیرم فاملین اوشاقی @gadadan

😁80👍9🤬8👏2❤‍🔥1

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈4,350 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ این روزها اسم آمپول‌های لاغری ( مثل مونجارو ) زیاد به گوشمون می‌خوره؛ اما این روش درمانی برای همه مناسب نیست و میتونه عوارض خطرناکی داشته باشه ! پرسشنامه زیر توسط جمعی از پزشکان متخصص غدد و تغذیه تهیه شده تا شما با پاسخ به چندسؤال کوتاه در کمتر از یک دقیقه متوجه بشین آیا تزریق آمپول لاغری برای شما توصیه می‌شه یا نه. 🟢 شروع ارزیابی

👍13😱1

Signed Vahid

12 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈4,270 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

نیازمندیها😍 @gadadan

💔67❤‍🔥9👍9🤬2

Signed Vahid

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @gadadan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 312,971 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گده دن زهلم گئدیر” (@gadadan), 54,073 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gadadan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.