Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alextruthzone

@alextruthzone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525636754
TypeChannel
Username@alextruthzone
Created11 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alextruthzone

Growth

169170169.57 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 169 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:16169-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:00170no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:08170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 10s
Average length
3m 33s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
650.0%
👍650.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2023 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2025, 09:35 UTC37 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I haven't posted in here for quite sometime as I only moved to Telegram because of the censorship during the scamdemic/plandemic. Feel I might have to start posting in here about Digital ID because i'm sure they are going to start banning people if you dare to question it....here we go again.

6

Signed Alex

25 Jun 2024, 06:48 UTC105 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/JqJNzUqf9MaxvmEt/?mibextid=D5vuiz

Signed Alex

20 Jun 2024, 22:57 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://banned.video/watch?id=667329a54e224dd6b27a1afa

Signed Alex

22 Mar 2024, 10:21 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/U1WMg5HuHwk?si=SXvmpf1yoielonqm

Signed Alex

23 Feb 2024, 21:36 UTC178 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://rumble.com/v4bxk9r-bombshell-study-we-now-have-100-scientific-proof-why-the-jabbed-are-dying-s.html?fbclid=IwAR3Qh6KfcNzWZDQZ7wgK4w6jkRp9q9IUqCLGJIe2tEBTa4eVaay4NzO5PuI

Signed Alex

1 Feb 2024, 19:35 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Dr Julie Sladden asking for a Royal Commission into covid. Amazing work. 🙏

Signed Alex

19 Jan 2024, 10:24 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AseemMalhotra

Jamie Foxx was forced against his will to get covid jabbed for movie, then developed debilitating blood clot in his brain: https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-01-jamie-foxx-forced-covid-vaccinated-brain-clot.html

Signed Alex

8 Dec 2023, 05:18 UTC115 viewsread 8 August 2026

20 Million plus worldwide dead from the jab. 100's of millions injured. This is a genocide. https://makegreatnow.com/pfizer-lawsuit-awakens-us-to-mass-cv19-vax-murders/

Signed Alex

14 Nov 2023, 09:43 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @craigkellyVideo

Craig Kelly @CKellyUAP WARNING : Tedros and the corrupt World Health Organisation are plotting to bring back "Vaccine Passports". And they want to bring them back as "International Digitised Vaccine Certificates" Their plan is that you won‘t be able to cross international borders unless you have submitted to inject into your body whatever the corrupt WHO demands. While Labor & Liberal continue to suck up to the

👍3

Signed Alex

10 Nov 2023, 08:56 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1832962/Oxford-AstraZeneca-covid-vaccine-legal-efficiency

Signed Alex

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alextruthzone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alextruthzone” (@alextruthzone), 169 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alextruthzone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.