Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Aaron Siri

@AaronSiri

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

694subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701887664
TypeChannel
Username@AaronSiri
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AaronSiri

Growth

693694693.56 Aug 2026, 12:03 — 693 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:37 — 693 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:44 — 694 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:037 Aug 2026, 06:44
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 693–694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:44694+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:37693no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:03693first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 694 subscribers
Avg views / post
477
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 May 202629 July 2026)
Views total3,340
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6730.0%
4118.4%
👏3616.1%
💯2611.7%
🙏156.73%
👎135.83%
🔥94.04%
😈41.79%
🤡31.35%
👌20.897%
😡20.897%
🤩20.897%
🥰20.897%
🤬10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC356 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Senator Hawley knew exactly what he was doing because he knew Fauci would invoke the Fifth Amendment, even in response to improper questions. @aaronsiri

👏7💯3😈3👌2👍21

22 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC280 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

With vaccines, you need to do your own research because the market is not going to correct itself and make them safer, nor are they going to be properly trialed beforehand. @aaronsiri

10👏6🙏5

21 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC246 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Meet your CDC nominee who “believes” in vaccines. One day we will get someone who thinks critically about instead of believing in and worshiping these products. When we do, the CDC might begin to care about all Americans—not just those who may be harmed by an infectious disease, but also those seriously harmed by these products. @aaronsiri

👍10🤡3😈1

18 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

“I would hope the Federal Government would stay out of the damn vaccine business.” - Tommy Tuberville @aaronsiri

💯11🙏5

17 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC428 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Dr. Schwartz, as CDC Director nominee, I appreciate that you “would love to have an open and transparent debate” with me to “understand why parents have vaccine hesitancy." I welcome that debate. Assuming you were being honest with Congress, contact my office with proposed dates and we will book a ballroom in DC for a full day “open and transparent debate.” Look forward to you keeping your promise to Congress and t

👍10🔥5👏2🥰2

16 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC220 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Records show a large number of pertussis and measles cases among the vaccinated. @aaronsiri

🙏4

16 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC190 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

“Siri told Reuters that his firm works on behalf of Americans injured by vaccines to bring the relief they are entitled to under VICP. If the compensation system were to be reformed to allow more claimants to sue drug makers directly, he said, there should be ‘very few, if any’ major awards of damages if vaccines are as safe as advertised.” But, of course, the reality is they won’t lift the immunity because the clai

💯7👏2🤩2👍1

3 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,680 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The Supreme Court's decision on Thursday basically made it so that the chemical industry can kill, maim, and injure you and your children with effective impunity. I explain how… @aaronsiri

4🤬1😡1

2 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC279 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is an allergy to mammalian meat (e.g., pork, beef, and lamb), dairy, and by-products; most cases result from lone star tick bites. … In 2022, up to 450,000 persons in the United States were estimated to be affected. … Based on … blood donor samples collected during 2024–2025 from 10 states, the estimated alpha-gal IgE seroprevalence was 24.0% in the five states with the highest seroprevalenc

👍2👏1💯1

30 Jun 2026, 20:13 UTC328 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"HHS Secretary Kennedy Signs COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization Declaration Terminations" https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-ends-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations.html @aaronsiri

👍5👏21

27 Jun 2026, 22:22 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The FDA has a monopoly within healthcare and for something to become the standard of care it requires an enormous amount of money and resources which only large pharmaceutical companies or well-funded biotech firms can realistically afford. @aaronsiri

👍42👏1😡1

27 Jun 2026, 21:24 UTC≈5,290 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Dr. Sabine Hazan , a gastroenterologist, explores the critical role of gut health, not losing any of her thousands of COVID patients, the science behind fecal transplants, and the connection between bifidobacteria and mental health. (00:00) Introduction to Dr. Sabine Hazan (01:31) The Science of Fecal Transplants (05:47) Understanding the Microbiome (13:21) Environmental Microbes and Immunity (23:54) The Gut Bat

3👏2👍1🔥1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AaronSiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,399 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aaron Siri” (@AaronSiri), 694 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AaronSiri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.