В ходе наступательной операции «Вивальди» ВСУ продемонстрировали масштабное и концептуально новое применение наземных роботизированных комплексов (НРК). 1. Воздушное десантирование НРК Главным новшеством операции стала доставка колесных и гусеничных роботов-камикадзе в глубокий тыл противника (более 10 км за линию фронта) с помощью тяжелых мультикоптеров-бомбардировщиков («Баба-Яга» и их аналоги). Оказавшись в тылу, …

Channel
Агил Рустамзаде
@Arustamzade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,283subscribers
-260 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002053920952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arustamzade |
| Description | Канал военного эксперта Агила Рустамзаде.Канал задуман для тех кому интересна аналитика о войнах,конфликтах и проблемах в сфере обороны и безопасности. |
| Created | 16 April 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arustamzade |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 25,283 | -64 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 25,347 | -23 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 25,370 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 25,378 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 25,393 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 25,403 | -18 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 25,421 | -25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 25,446 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 25,460 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:32 | 25,471 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:53 | 25,476 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 25,492 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 25,495 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 25,501 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 25,507 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 25,513 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 25,510 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 25,512 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 25,521 | -26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 25,547 | first reading |
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 87.3%
- avg views ÷ 25,283 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 22,100
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (7 July 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 154,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 04:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,340
- Videos
- ≈687
- Links
- ≈418
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 41s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
27 сентября 2020 года — первый день Второй Карабахской войны и прорыва глубоко эшелонированной, укрепленной линии обороны. Освобожденная земля, окропленная кровью и прахом наших бойцов. В День Памяти с глубоким уважением и благодарностью мы чтим память павших за Родину.
Ключевые выводы из опыта по борьбе с реактивными дронами в российско- украинской войне: Неэффективность мобильных групп: Из-за высоких скоростей (450–600 км/ч) и высоты полета (2–4 км) пулеметные расчеты не успевают реагировать и доставать цели по высоте. Истощение классической ПВО: Перехват БПЛА зенитными ракетами (ЗРК/ПЗРК) эффективен из-за контрастного ИК-следа турбины, но приводит к быстрому расходу дорогого бо…
3 года назад. Болела спина. Началась антитеррористическая операция в Карабахе. Муторное это чувство: мужики там кровь проливают, а ты оцениваешь это из кабинета. Но надо было. За два дня было много интервью и комментариев. Операция длилась 23 часа 43 минуты и закончилась полной зачисткой сепаратистов. Да упокоит Аллах души наших воинов, павших в боях.
Перехват ракетами PAC-3 ЗРК Patriot остается самым надежным способом спасения критической инфраструктуры непосредственно в момент атаки, но его стоимость ($3–8 млн за противоракету) и ограниченные объемы производства на Западе делают ставку на перенос усилий на уничтожение «меча» и «руки, его держащей» — единственная рабочая альтернатива при дефиците зенитных ракет. Следует отметить что данные методы довольно результ…
Силы Обороны Украины испытывая острейший дефицит ракет -перехватчиков Patriot пробует ассиметричные методы борьбы. Ключевые направления асимметричной борьбы: Охота за носителями (до пуска): Уничтожение кораблей-носителей «Калибров» в портах (БЭК, «Нептун»), а также ПУ «Искандер» и стратегической авиации на аэродромах (HIMARS, ATACMS, БПЛА) на основе данных космической и аэроразведки (Shark, PD-2). Удары по ВПК и л…
Анализ целей комбинированных ракетно-дроновых ударов РФ позволяет судить о кампании по формированию предпосылок к гуманитарному кризису. С высокой долей вероятности видны контуры стратегии РФ по уничтожению объектов критической инфраструктуры (продуктовых складов, систем водоснабжения и топливно-энергетического комплекса). Цели РФ ясны, они неизменны: как минимум — усадить украинскую власть за стол переговоров на выг…
Парад дронов в Киеве. Просто поражает какой скачок военных технологий произошёл за несколько лет. З Днем Незалежності Україна!
Давно хулиганов не было.
RAND corporation предлагает воспрепятствовать созданию биооружия на базе ИИ до его выпуска, предотвращая катастрофы с миллионами жертв. Ниже выжимки из доклада Главный физический фильтр: Сплошной обязательный скрининг заказов ДНК/прекурсоров в лабораториях. Главный цифровой фильтр: Защита открытых ИИ-моделей от взлома + мониторинг цепочек действий пользователей в реальном времени. Централизация: Единая база подозр…
Антенны мобильной связи 5G смогут обнаруживать и отслеживать дроны. Технологический сдвиг: Lockheed Martin запустила систему NetSense — пассивный мониторинг БПЛА через сети мобильной связи 5G вместо развертывания дорогих радиолокационных станций. Принцип: ИИ (NVIDIA, Astris AI) отслеживает микроискажения радиосигнала 5G (Verizon) от корпуса дрона. Система «невидна» для РЭР и не требует частотных разрешений. Коо…
Тезисы и аналитические выводы Майкла Кофмана ( с которыми я согласен )из подкаста One Decision (а также его сопутствующих публикаций для Foreign Affairs и War on the Rocks): Позиции и динамика фронта: Позиции Украины стабилизировались, а наступательный потенциал РФ уперся в предел — любое продвижение стало крайне медленным и затратным. Проблемы управления РФ: Политические задачи Кремля оторваны от реальности из-за т…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @Arustamzade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@yigal_levin · 219,033#1
@ButusovPlus · 348,142#2
@insiderukr · 2,187,989#3
@stemanalytics · 4,142#4
@zloyodessit · 82,229#5
@nexta_live · 771,869#6
@voinasordoy · 200,967#7
@military_az · 23,946#8
@Kirilovolodimirovich · 106,355#9
@RH_inside · 5,338#10
@mneniyefm · 4,301#11
@vert2026 · 117,714#12
@bbcrussian · 387,211#13
@generalsvr · 280,766#14
@dmytrogordon_official · 289,763#15
@caliber_az_official · 51,098#16
@haqqin_azz · 58,982#17
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#18
@reality_of_war · 1,755#19
@AnatoliyAmelin · 19,426#20
@bulvarBaku · 3,464#21
@rovshanmejinfo · 1,273#22
@ukraine_context · 93,328#23
@ve4niyvoy · 113,471#24
@Caucasian_bureau · 19,913#25
@gvasadze · 2,809#26
@volyamedia · 45,980#27
@nevzorovtv · 1,014,219#28
@deepstateua · 760,108#29
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,177#30
@JokerBaku · 8,419#31
@lachentyt · 1,552,688#32
@ssternenko · 880,002#33
@ateobreaking · 708,254#34
@romanenko_dns · 53,438#35
@truexanewsua · 3,127,466#36
@ukrbavovna · 711,924#37
@Nackepelo · 212,531#38
@voynareal · 1,514,585#39
@kazansky2017 · 149,018#40
@ShrikeNews · 97,021#41
@war_monitor · 971,692#42
@O_Arestovich_official · 241,702#43
@Pravda_Gerashchenko · 314,739#44
@Tsaplienko · 321,310#45
@uniannet · 706,499#46
@UDudaka · 7,198#47
@astrapress · 345,208#48
@oko_gora · 67,839#49
@kpszsu · 905,765#50
@kopytkoav · 26,728#51
@kievreal1 · 1,556,551#52
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,808#53
@AlfredKochBayern · 42,046#54
@pandoras_box_ua · 158,995#55
@ejdailyru · 671,042#56
@minval_az · 23,177#57
@slvn_pomet · 282,556#58
@Crimeanwind · 225,781#59
@karas_evgen · 163,514#60
@vatnoeboloto · 382,750#61
@censor_net · 183,762#62
@babchenko77 · 80,587#63
@informnapalm · 131,350#64
@myro_shnykov · 31,081#65
@maidentower · 33,886#66
@u_now · 3,863#67
@SBelkovskiy · 67,555#68
@stranaua · 332,543#69
@yzheleznyak · 97,710#70
@berezoview · 140,969#71
@v_zelenskiy_official · 670,140#72
@osirskiy · 48,471#73
@ukrpravda_news · 201,174#74
@Fikrat_Shabanov · 61,133#75
@gorodglupov · 155,883#76
@BerezaJuice · 144,096#77
@ermaka2022 · 82,479#78
@pezduzalive · 372,470#79
@LipsitsIgor · 40,201#80
@bahshiddemon · 171,886#81
@MarkFeygin · 118,213#82
@robert_magyar · 601,878#83
@Zaluzhnui · 240,040#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Kirilovolodimirovich · 106,355
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@KamilAskerkhanov · 24,118
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@military_az · 23,946
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
@Kushnar_media · 44,842
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@caliber_az_official · 51,098
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@haqqin_azz · 58,982
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@kopytkoav · 26,728
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@bakburila · 87,990
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
@zvizdecmanhustu · 68,310
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@minval_az · 23,177
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
@romanenko_dns · 53,438
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
@Fikrat_Shabanov · 61,133
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Агил Рустамзаде” (@Arustamzade), 25,283 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arustamzade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.