Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бакинский бульвар 🎙️

@bulvarBaku

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,498subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768184020
TypeChannel
Username@bulvarBaku
Created13 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bulvarBaku

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,4893,5043,496.56 August 2026 — 3,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,504 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,503 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,498 subscribers3,4986 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,487–3,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:323,498-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:313,503-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:403,504+15
6 Aug 2026, 10:503,489no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:303,489first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.4%
avg views ÷ 3,498 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total32,653
Reactions total429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 11s
Average length
2m 18s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

429 reactions across 22 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11426.6%
🙏5713.3%
👍5512.8%
💯409.32%
🤣337.69%
😁225.13%
👌173.96%
🤡173.96%
❤‍🔥163.73%
👎143.26%
🤔102.33%
👏81.86%
🙈61.40%
💩51.17%
🤮30.699%
😱20.466%
🤯20.466%
🥴20.466%
🌚10.233%
🍌10.233%
4 further kinds40.932%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 22 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bulvarBaku. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC393 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NesreddinMollaPhoto

Союз армии, денег и атомной бомбы. Давно в исламском мире не появлялось ничего подобного. Турция, Пакистан и Саудовская Аравия постепенно складываются в новую геополитическую конструкцию. И это, судя по всему, только начало. Анкара, Эр-Рияд и Исламабад прекрасно понимают: война против Ирана не дала того результата, на который рассчитывали ее инициаторы. Да, Тегеран не победил в классическом понимании этого слова. Н

🙏11👎21

7 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC529 views16 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

❗️В Кельбаджаре — невероятная красота. Безграничный туристический и сельскохозяйственный потенциал. В прошлом году я был в Лачине, и он меня по-настоящему удивил. Кельбаджар впечатлил не меньше — своей природой, масштабом и теми возможностями, которые здесь открываются. Но впереди еще огромная работа. И именно поэтому становится понятным, логичным и объяснимым, почему регион пока остается закрытым для широкого посещ

❤‍🔥9💯42🤷‍♀1

7 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC527 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vesti_azPhoto

Турция, Саудовская Аравия и Пакистан подписали трехстороннее оборонное соглашение под названием «Соглашение Мекки». Согласно документу, вооруженное нападение на любое из трех государств будет рассматриваться как нападение на всех участников соглашения. @vesti_az

❤‍🔥6🙏2

6 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,160 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Есть вопросы. Но в ответ — тишина. Реформ не нужно бояться. Это естественный процесс развития, переход от одной модели к другой. Но страх перед реформами, нежелание выходить из зоны комфорта неизбежно приводят к стагнации, а затем — к куда более тяжелым последствиям. Сегодня у нас есть серьезные преимущества. Есть деньги. Есть человеческий ресурс. Есть стабильность. Не хватает другого — креативного мышления и гот

💯223🙏2🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC859 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇦🇿🇺🇦 Байрамов сегодня в Киеве. @bulvarBaku

20💩5🤣2👍1👎1

5 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC918 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️В Баку пришлось публично поправить турецкую прессу. Помощник президента Азербайджана Хикмет Гаджиев заявил, что в публикации газеты Türkiye Gazetesi его слова были переданы с искажениями. «В той статье ряд выражений, приведенных со ссылкой на меня, неверны. Хотел бы еще раз подчеркнуть, что Азербайджанская Республика, руководствуясь своими национальными интересами, проводит независимую и принципиальную внешнюю по

👍10👏5

5 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC810 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @military_az

​​🇺🇸В Пентагоне сообщили о 687 раненных военных США из-за конфликта с Ираном Общее число американских военнослужащих, которые получили ранения с момента начала Израилем и США боевых действий против Ирана 28 февраля, составляет 687 человек, говорится в данных Пентагона. При проведении операции «Эпическая ярость» были ранены 417 военнослужащих США, погибли - 14. Кроме того, Пентагон ведет отдельные подсчеты потерь,

🤡41💊1🤯1

3 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC765 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NesreddinMolla

💰 Деньги есть, но вы держитесь… В Азербайджане придумали новый финансовый жанр — дивиденды на перспективу. По протоколу, подписанному еще в декабре 2025 года, SOCAR должен выплатить государству дивиденды за 2025–2026 годы на сумму 529 миллионов долларов. Но зачем такая спешка? Решили растянуть удовольствие: платить будут равными долями… до 2040 года. Правда, есть один нюанс. Как выяснила Счетная палата, даже те

🤔6🤣42

3 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC640 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @JokerBaku

❗️ Почему революция в России пока маловероятна История России показывает, что затяжные войны без убедительных военных успехов всегда создавали серьезные риски для существующей власти. Неудачи в русско-японской войне стали одним из факторов Первой русской революции 1905 года, а тяжелые социально-экономические последствия Первой мировой войны в сочетании с отказом армии поддержать монархию привели к Февральской револю

👌9🤮31👎1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈1,100 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️ КСИР рассматривает возможность нанесения превентивных ударов, поскольку иранские власти осознают политическую уязвимость Трампа и намерены воспользоваться этой ситуацией, сообщает The Wall Street Journal. @bulvarBaku

👌7👎3🥴2

2 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈4,020 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

⏳ Шаг вперед, два назад! С 1 августа 2026 года в Азербайджане введены новые лимиты на переводы с карты на карту (card-to-card). Это соглашение Центрального банка Азербайджана и коммерческих банков. Цель — усиление безопасности и прозрачности цифровых платежей (в том числе против использования C2C для обхода POS-терминалов и налоговых требований). Банки уже рассылают SMS-уведомления клиентам. Количество операций: м

20💯14👏2🤯1

1 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,090 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NesreddinMollaVideo

Патриарх Кирилл назвал создание в СССР ядерного оружия «благодатью и божьей милостью» По мнению главы РПЦ, атомная бомба спасла православный Советский Союз от захвата бездуховным Западом, который хотел поработить и даже истребить русский народ. ❗️Плохо, когда у святоши окончательно едет кукуха. Над иранскими муллами годами смеялись, само слово «мулла» сделали синонимом мракобесия. А теперь выясняется любопытная в

🤣19👎6🙈43🤡3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @bulvarBaku. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,820 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бакинский бульвар 🎙️” (@bulvarBaku), 3,498 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bulvarBaku.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.