Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1,676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368,867–371,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:19
369,118
-485
11 Aug 2026, 05:42
369,603
-233
10 Aug 2026, 03:31
369,836
-271
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
370,107
-307
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
370,414
-224
7 Aug 2026, 02:16
370,638
-156
6 Aug 2026, 07:00
370,794
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:57
370,794
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 369,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,100
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.403%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
20 (2 May 2026 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
23,100
Reactions total
93
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,050
Videos
≈83
Links
≈4,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,025 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
230
22.4%
🔥
164
16.0%
👍
153
14.9%
🎉
150
14.6%
🤩
147
14.3%
🥰
130
12.7%
🐳
26
2.54%
👏
14
1.37%
🤯
11
1.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Airdrop: InstaPay Airdrop
💰 Reward: Share of 100,000 USDT
🏆 Winners: All eligible participants
📅 End Date: Ongoing
🏦 Distribution Date: TBA
Go to the Airdrop Page
📃 Information:
InstaPay is rewarding early adopters with a share of 100,000 USDT.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Visit the Airdrop Page
🔹 Create an account or log in
🔹 Complete your daily login to earn 20 points
🔹 Finish social tasks to earn 100 points each
…
🚀 Airdrop: Grass Season 2
💰 Reward: Potential >$7000
🏆 Winners: Everyone
👥 Per Referral: Grass point
📗 Investment: Raised over $4.5m
📅 End Date: TBA
🏦 Distribution Date: Mid July
Go to the Airdrop Page
Check the Airdrop Guide
📃 Information:
Grass is a blockchain-based web scraping protocol for sustainable and scalable data collection.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Visit the airdrop page
🔹 Register
🔹 Farm points
🌐 Websi…
🚀 Airdrop: Artyfact USDT Airdrop
💰 Reward: 10,000 $USDT prize pool
🏆 Winners: 1000 random winners will share 6000 $USDT & Top 100 referrers will share 4000 $USDT
📅 End Date: August 7, 2026
🏦 Distribution Date: August 14, 2026
Talk to the Telegram Bot
📃 Information:
Artyfact is the virtual world where players can find entertainment for every taste using $ARTY, the platform's utility token.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 S…
🚀 Airdrop: Binance From Crypto To Wall Street
💰 Reward: Share of 10,000,000 USDC token voucher pool (up to 10 USDC per user)
🏆 Winners: Eligible new and existing Binance users
📅 End Date: TBA
🏦 Distribution Date: On or before June 19, 2026
Go to the Airdrop Page
📃 Information:
Binance is celebrating the launch of U.S. Stocks & ETFs Trading on its platform.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Sign up for a Binance account if y…
🚀 Airdrop: PX Finance Trade-to-Earn Rewards
💰 Reward: Daily USDT rewards
🏆 Winners: Active traders meeting daily point targets
📅 End Date: Ongoing
🏦 Distribution Date: Daily at 17:00 UTC
Talk to the Telegram Bot
📃 Information:
PX Finance is an automated trading website, helping you trade futures, accumulate rewards & earn USDT every day
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Start the Telegram Bot
🔹 Deposit USDT as trading balan…
🚀 Airdrop: Artyfact USDT Airdrop
💰 Reward: 10,000 $USDT prize pool
🏆 Winners: 1000 random winners will share 6000 $USDT & Top 100 referrers will share 4000 $USDT
📅 End Date: August 7, 2026
🏦 Distribution Date: August 14, 2026
Talk to the Telegram Bot
📃 Information:
Artyfact is the virtual world where players can find entertainment for every taste using $ARTY, the platform's utility token.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 S…
🚀 Airdrop: Bull Genesis - The First Move
💰 Reward: $1000+
🏆 Winners: 100
📅 End Date: June 22, 2026
🏦 Distribution Date: Automatically after event ends
Go to the Airdrop Page
📃 Information:
Bullbit is a hyper AI DEX that democratizes access to derivatives trading, token launching, and AI-driven tools.
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Go to the Airdrop Page
🔹 Complete campaign tasks to earn Bullpoints
🔹 Participate in the Lu…
🚀 Airdrop: €uroToken
💰 Reward: Earn €URO + referral rewards
🏆 Winners: All active participants
📅 End Date: Ongoing
🏦 Distribution Date: Instant USDT payouts
Talk to the Telegram Bot
📃 Information:
EuroToken is a next-generation global ecosystem where participation is rewarded and partnership works for you 24/7
📖 Step-by-step guide:
🔹 Start the Telegram Bot
🔹 Complete your daily check-in to earn 5 €URO
🔹 Complete a…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AirdropO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 119,106 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Kart @AirdropKartOfficial · 175,902 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Airdrop Star @AirdropStar · 320,621 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@Airdrop @Airdrop · 1,107,240 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Inspector @airdropinspector · 682,498 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Detective @AirdropDetective · 1,081,247 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Ninja Pro @AirdropNinja365 · 190,679 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Airdrop Comic @airdropcomic · 321,837 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Airdrop Presents 🗽 @airdrop_Presents · 202,025 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Official Airdrop6 @airdrop6officialchannel · 1,330,814 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Brother @AirdropBrotherOfficial · 159,398 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Official Airdrop Pro ️ @OfficialAirdropPro · 182,809 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Immortal Airdrops @immortal_airdrops · 623,284 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Airdrop BlogSpot (Official) @airdropblogspot · 213,041 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
21 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎎 Airdrop Ninja 🎎” (@AirdropO), 369,118 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.