Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pepe Palm Beach $PPB

Supergroup

Pepe Palm Beach $PPB

@Pepe_Palm_Beach

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

5,583members

-70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

117 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003398640284
TypeSupergroup
Username@Pepe_Palm_Beach
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pepe_Palm_Beach

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,5325,6605,5966 August 2026 — 5,653 members6 August 2026 — 5,655 members10 August 2026 — 5,659 members12 August 2026 — 5,660 members16 August 2026 — 5,653 members19 August 2026 — 5,647 members22 August 2026 — 5,655 members26 August 2026 — 5,645 members29 August 2026 — 5,640 members30 August 2026 — 5,640 members1 September 2026 — 5,624 members5 September 2026 — 5,617 members10 September 2026 — 5,610 members14 September 2026 — 5,601 members18 September 2026 — 5,597 members28 September 2026 — 5,589 members5 October 2026 — 5,573 members12 October 2026 — 5,532 members15 October 2026 — 5,585 members17 October 2026 — 5,589 members20 October 2026 — 5,581 members23 October 2026 — 5,583 members5,5836 August 202623 October 2026
22 measurements spanning 78 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,513–5,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
23 Oct 2026, 16:065,583+2
20 Oct 2026, 19:165,581-8
17 Oct 2026, 23:395,589+4
15 Oct 2026, 03:595,585+53
12 Oct 2026, 10:155,532-41
5 Oct 2026, 19:005,573-16
28 Sept 2026, 07:025,589-8
18 Sept 2026, 21:175,597-4
14 Sept 2026, 07:375,601-9
10 Sept 2026, 09:185,610-7
5 Sept 2026, 03:185,617-7
1 Sept 2026, 19:435,624-16
30 Aug 2026, 19:565,640no change
29 Aug 2026, 09:245,640-5
26 Aug 2026, 01:135,645-10
22 Aug 2026, 17:485,655+8
19 Aug 2026, 04:355,647-6
16 Aug 2026, 03:055,653-7
12 Aug 2026, 20:035,660+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:315,659first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pepe Palm Beach $PPB” (@Pepe_Palm_Beach), 5,583 members as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pepe_Palm_Beach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.