و لمن اتهمني بالفشل أنا لم أفشل لأنني لم أكن أعرف كيف أربح. فشلت لأنني لم ألتزم بخطة الخروج عندما أصبحت الأرباح كبيرة و الله غالب .
👍79❤68👏15🐳12💯5🤝3⚡2🏆1
Signed Adam Kamal

Channel
@Adamkamal144
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
47,364subscribers
+657 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001600501486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Adamkamal144 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Adamkamal144 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
28,200 average views per post against 47,364 subscribers — an engagement rate of 59.4%. Across the 1,841 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,637–99,843 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.83% and 12.5%, with a median of 5.31%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 450,400 |
| Mature posts only | 64.3% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 47,364 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:ara · 1,841 channels · p10 0.504% · p25 1.83% · p50 5.31% · p75 12.5% · p90 22.9% |
| Position in cohort | 99.348th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.066% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 47,364 | -67 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 47,431 | +2,025 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 45,406 | -73 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 45,479 | -79 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 45,558 | -1,081 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 46,639 | -52 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 46,691 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 46,707 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (22 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 450,400 |
| Reactions total | 2,890 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4,723 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,866 | 60.7% | |
| 👍 | 907 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 181 | 3.83% | |
| 👌 | 148 | 3.13% | |
| 💯 | 132 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5215486050046062421 | 96 | 2.03% | |
| 👏 | 86 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5292251044204521072 | 80 | 1.69% | |
| 🐳 | 77 | 1.63% | |
| ⚡ | 66 | 1.40% | |
| 🤝 | 38 | 0.805% | |
| 🏆 | 37 | 0.783% | |
| custom 4979010781430416788 | 9 | 0.191% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Adamkamal144. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
و لمن اتهمني بالفشل أنا لم أفشل لأنني لم أكن أعرف كيف أربح. فشلت لأنني لم ألتزم بخطة الخروج عندما أصبحت الأرباح كبيرة و الله غالب .
👍79❤68👏15🐳12💯5🤝3⚡2🏆1
Signed Adam Kamal
هذه قصتي مع العملات البديله في بول ران 2023/2024 وقصة اعضاء قناة Wallet 2025 و 360 شهود علي هذه الصفقات و لم ادخلها لوحدي . كان المبلغ المخصص 10 الف دولار للعملات البديله . دخلت في الربع الاخير من عام 2023 في عملة SEI و ORAI كان سعر دخولي في SEI من 0،09$ خرجت عند 1$ كان سعر دخولي في ORAI من 1،6$ الي 20$ و كان في صفقات اخري مثل Rio حققنا 10 اكس و Floki حققنا 10 اكس و KAS حققنا 20 اكس و تم تحقيق 10 اكس علي مبلغ 10 ا…
❤137👍28👏15👌10💯9🐳7⚡3🏆3
Signed Adam Kamal
المعايير و البرومنت السابق اللي كنت نشرته في اختبار و اختيار العملات تم وضعها بشكل مثالي زياده عن اللزوم و صارم جداً و صعب 95% من عملات السوق ان تتخطي هذا البروتوكول و هذا قد يضيع فرص علي الناس ، لذلك تم تخفيف المعايير لتواكب وضع اغلب عملات السوق بخصوص التضخم و الفك و مقاومة الحاسوب الكمي مع الحفاظ علي الاساسيات لذلك جرب هذا البروتوكول في تقييم العملات اساسياً . الخطواط . 1- خذ هذه الصورة و ضعها في محادثه في اي نمو…
❤92⚡11👍11custom 52154860500460624218🐳4🔥3🤝3👌2
Signed Adam Kamal
في البير ماركت لا تعتمد في اختياراتك و بناء محفظتك علي التحليل الفني و ركز علي التحليل الاساسي . اغلب العملات هابطه اكثر من 90% و الشرتات نماذجها الفنية متطابقه بنسبة كبيره جداً و لكن لا تستطيع تخمين من في هذه العملات بيعود و يحقق قمة و من منها بيموت و يختفي و الفيصل التحليل الاساسي و تكنولوجيا العمله و تطوير الفريق . و في البول ماركت اعتمد علي التحليل الفني لتحديد مستويات الخروج و في السوق الصاعد بيتساوى المشروع ا…
❤95💯23🔥17⚡5👍4🤝3🐳2custom 52154860500460624212
Signed Adam Kamal
تحديث S&P 500 الان السعر 7،747$ اقترب مؤشر S&P 500 من اتمام دورة صاعده عند مستوي 8020$ اتوقع بدايه الدخول في منطقه الانعكاس و تصريف في هذا النطاق 8020$ الي 8200$ مع ظهور تشكل دايفرجنس سلبي علي RSI فريم اسبوعي ، و اتوقع ان الربع الاخير من هذا العام يشهد بدايه بيع وتقفيل السنة الماليه و الضرائب كما جرت العاده في اكتوبر و نوفمبر . والله اعلى واعلم .
❤61👍40custom 529225104420452107210⚡6💯5custom 52154860500460624211
Signed Adam Kamal
البيتكوين الان 64637$ يتداول اكثر من شهرين اسفل مقاومة 64998$ و تم اختراق هذه المقاومه مرتين مره في يونيو و مره في يوليو اختراق وهمي و عاد اسفل المقاومه نحتاج اختراق حقيقي و لتاكيد الاختراق يجب ان يكون بشمعه قويه بزخم و فوليوم و اغلاق اسبوع تداول اعلي المقاومه 64998$ و الهدف 75 الف و عنده نحدث غير كدا ارفع الحذر من الرفض هنا هذه المره الان اقرب دعم هيكون 54 الف ، - اول رفض في شهر يونيو صعد الي 67 الف و صحح الي 57 ا…
❤122👍41🔥19👌7custom 52154860500460624214custom 52922510442045210724💯3🐳1
Signed Adam Kamal
و تقدر تتابع اوامر و جدار الاوردر بوك و احجام الطلبات علي اي عمله و تقدر تحدد منها مناطق السيوله و العرض و الطلب مع نبذه تحليله للاوردر بوك في اخر التقرير و تحديد مستويات الدعم و المقاومه بناء علي جدار الطلبات ، اسم الاداه Order Book بوت 360
❤46custom 52922510442045210728💯7🏆4custom 52154860500460624211
Signed Adam Kamal
تقدر تتابع سبلاي و نسب طباعه و حرق العملات المستقرة USDT و USDC و الشبكات المستخدمة في الطباعه و الحرق من علي بوت 360
❤34👍28👌10💯3custom 52154860500460624211
Signed Adam Kamal
استحواذ USDT.D الان 8.39% فريم اسبوعي الان في اطار تشكيل قمة او قد شكلها لسه لم تظهر تاكيد عليها في نهايه موجه 5 مع ظهور دايفرجنس سلبي علي RSI و علي الماكدي بين موجه 3 و موجه 5 قد تكون موجه 5 منقطعه هنا عند مستوي 9.38% او يخترق 9.38% و الهدف النهائي في حين حدوث امتداد للموجه الي مستوي 10.18% و يبداء انعكاس الحركة الصاعده منذ ديسمبر 2024 هذا بيوضح في حركتة الاسابيع القادمة ان شاء الله و اهم مستويات المتابعه ال…
❤77👍24👌12🔥6💯3🏆1custom 52154860500460624211
Signed Adam Kamal
أبداً في رفع الحذر الذهب الان 4230$ انتبه من الذهب وصل نطاق مقاومة 4300$ متوقع يحدث تراجع من هذا النطاق ، و لاستكمال الايجابيه ولكي تطمئن للاتجاه و تاكيد الصعود يجب اختراق زاوية 180 علي فريم الاسبوعي يجب اغلاق اسبوع تداول اعلى مستوي 4300$ و الا فهذا الصعود كله من 3976$ كان صعود تصحيحي و اعادة اختبار زاوية 180 لذلك ارفع الحذر من هذا النطاق الي ان يتم تاكيد الاتجاه باختراق واغلاق اسبوع اعلى 4300$ . - ملحوظة قد يتم اخت…
❤98👍28custom 52154860500460624217🔥5👌2🏆1🐳1
Signed Adam Kamal
يفضل توزيع المخاطر هذه الفترة ، 1- نقل عملاتك الي محفظة باردة الي ان يستقر و يتحسن وضع السوق ولا تترك عملاتك علي اي منصة . 2- لو متعلق مثل حلاتي و مثل الاغلبيه للاسف في العملات البديله فهذه المرحلة مناسبة لمراجعة محفظتك لازم تفلتر عملاتك ، ركز علي عملات قوية و لو متعلق في عملات ضعيفه يفضل فلترة و عمل تبديل مراكز علي عملات جيده تكون هبطه نفس النسبه . 3- وزع المخاطرة في العملات علي اكثر من اربع الي 6 عملات . اولاً …
❤181👍42👌14⚡9custom 52154860500460624217🐳5💯5👏3
Signed Adam Kamal
بغض النظر عن الحروب و النظره السلبية العامة المنتشرة . انا مركز و مهتم و متابع و براهن علي هذه القطاعات، 1- قطاع RWA ترميز الاصول ، 2- قطاع L1 لير 1 الشبكات . 3-مهتم بتقنية Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP). المستخدمة الان في قطاع مشاريع ZK-Rollup . اعتقد والله اعلم ان الثلاث قطاعات هذه هيكون فيها فرص ممتازة خلال الفترة القادمة من 2027 الي 2029 ان شاء الله . والله اعلى واعلم .
❤165👍37🔥22💯11custom 52154860500460624218⚡4🐳4🏆3
Signed Adam Kamal
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Adamkamal144. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 183,944 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Adam kamal” (@Adamkamal144), 47,364 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Adamkamal144.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.