تحليل البيتكوين بعد الانخفاض الأخير هل نحن أمام قاع؟ https://youtu.be/gsdF0c5jiv8
❤4👌2💔1

Channel
@jemyjrcrypto7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,265subscribers
-617 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001746754264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jemyjrcrypto7 |
| Description | حسابتنا الرسمية علي وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي https://linktr.ee/jemyjrcrypto7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jemyjrcrypto7 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:29 | 12,265 | -10 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:00 | 12,275 | -7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 12,282 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:59 | 12,289 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:46 | 12,294 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 12,306 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 12,311 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:49 | 12,321 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:36 | 12,335 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 12,342 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 12,344 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 12,349 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 12,358 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 12,367 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:49 | 12,376 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:25 | 12,378 | -21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 12,399 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 12,407 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 12,409 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 12,419 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (31 May 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,704 |
| Reactions total | 115 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
449 reactions across 44 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 243 | 54.1% | |
| 👏 | 48 | 10.7% | |
| 💔 | 45 | 10.0% | |
| 👌 | 38 | 8.46% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 6.01% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 4.23% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 2.67% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 1.78% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 1.34% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.445% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.223% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تحليل البيتكوين بعد الانخفاض الأخير هل نحن أمام قاع؟ https://youtu.be/gsdF0c5jiv8
❤4👌2💔1
🟠 Binance تشهد تدفقات صافية داخلة على مدار الساعة بعد موجة سحوبات أولية ❌ صرح CZ أن منصة Binance تحولت مجدداً لتسجيل تدفقات مالية داخلة بشكل صافٍ خلال الساعات الأخيرة. 🏦 يأتي هذا التحول بعد مرحلة سحوبات أولية شهدتها المنصة، مما يعكس استقراراً في حركة السيولة. ⬅️ تأثير السوق: تحول حركة السيولة إلى تدفقات إيجابية داخل منصة بينانس يقلل من مخاوف الذعر المالي ويدعم ثقة المستثمرين في السوق.
❤9👏5
اكبر سرقة واختراق بتاريخ الكريبتو حصل في Binance ورغم هذا البتكوين والسوق صمد بشكل ممتاز انت تعرف اختراق مثل هذا قبل 2022 كان ممكن يسبب انهيار مرعب بالبتكوين والسوق
👏8😱2❤1
عاجل: كوريا الشمالية مسؤولة عن عملية اختراق منصة "بينانس" (Binance) التي بلغت قيمتها 6 مليارات دولار، وفقاً لما ذكرته شبكة "سي إن إن" (CNN).
🤯3❤1😱1
🚨 ترامب يدخل على خط أزمة Binance والملف قد يتحول إلى قضية عالمية الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب يقول إنه يتابع قضية الاختراق المزعوم لمنصة Binance والذي تقدر خسائره المتداولة بنحو 6.3 مليار دولار نحن لا نتحدث عن حادثة أمنية عادية بل عن واحدة من أضخم عمليات السرقة المالية في التاريخ والآن مع دخول اسم الرئيس الأمريكي على خط القضية يرتفع مستوى الاهتمام بها بشكل غير مسبوق هل تتحول أزمة Binance من كارثة في عالم ال…
❤1
🔔 الحزب الشيوعي الصيني يدعو لتشديد الحملة ضد الفساد المرتبط بالعملات المشفرة 🌐 دعوات رسمية جديدة في الصين لتكثيف الرقابة وتغليظ العقوبات بشأن الاستخدامات غير المشروعة للأصول الرقمية. 🪙 التشديد يستهدف استغلال العملات المشفرة في عمليات الفساد والجرائم المالية. ⬅️ تأثير السوق: تأثير سلبي متوسط على سوق العملات المشفرة بسبب مخاوف زيادة التضييق التنظيمي والملاحقات القانونية من قبل الحكومة الصينية.
🔴 عاجل: آرثر هايز ينقل 8000 ETH ويستلم 11.73 مليون USDC 🔹 قام آرثر هايز بتحويل ما يقارب 8000 ETH. 🏦 حصل في المقابل على نحو 11.73 مليون USDC من شركتي Galaxy Digital وFlowdesk. ⬅️ تأثير السوق: تحويل كمية كبيرة من عملة إيثريوم مقابل عملات مستقرة بواسطة أحد كبار المستثمرين يشير عادة إلى عمليات بيع أو تصفية مراكز، مما يخلق ضغطاً سلبياً على سعر ETH.
💯1
🔴 ترقب واسع لـ "أربعاء حاسم" في الأسواق المالية العالمية 🏦 انعقاد اجتماع اللجنة الفيدرالية للسوق المفتوحة (FOMC) والمؤتمر الصحفي لـ Kevin Warsh. 📰 إعلان نتائج أرباح كبرى شركات التكنولوجيا: Microsoft، Google، Amazon، وSanDisk بعد إغلاق الجلسة. ⬅️ تأثير السوق: يُتوقع أن تشهد الأسواق تقلبات مرتفعة للغاية تزامناً مع قرارات الفيدرالي الأمريكي ونتائج أرباح شركات التكنولوجيا العملاقة.
👏1🔥1
محتوي اعلاني فقط و ليست نصيحة استثمارية 🥰
💔9❤3
راعي الحلقة: duelbet 🚨 عاجل: أحد اللاعبين حوّل للتو 2 دولار إلى 9,657 دولارًا على @duel_bet 🔥🤯 🎰 اللعب هنا قد يكون أفضل قرار لك! 🪂 كل من يقوم بالإيداع على DuelBet.com مؤهل للمشاركة في الإيردروب بقيمة مليون دولار 💰 🎁 بونص إيداع يصل إلى 500% + 500 لفة مجانية (FS)، حصريًا على المنصة! أنا ألعب على DuelBet أيضًا، لأنها من المنصات التي أفضّلها، مع تجربة لعب مجهولة الهوية ودون الحاجة إلى إجراءات التحقق من الهوية (KYC)، وفقً…
💔16❤4😱3
خروج 635 مليون دولار من البيتكوين في يوم واحد! https://youtu.be/H2YbUHOPBz0
❤6
هتكلم بالتفصيل عن الموضوع ده النهاردة ان شاء الله
👏5👌3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @jemyjrcrypto7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jemy JR Crypto | چيمي” (@jemyjrcrypto7), 12,265 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jemyjrcrypto7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.