🇺🇸 اليوم: ردّت السيناتور سينثيا لوميس على الادعاءات بأن العملات المستقرة تضر بالبنوك المحلية. وأكدت أن الودائع في ازدياد، وأن التهديد الحقيقي يكمن في اندماج البنوك، وليس في قانون الشفافية. ...
🔥76💯48🤩39👍35🥰31😍29❤26❤🔥26

Channel
@cryptobadr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,887subscribers
+4,980 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001476105577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptobadr |
| Description | • مجتمع تعليم | تحليل فني | صفقات | مضاربة | توصيات | عملات رقمية | إدارة محفظة | خدمات #BTC ـ crypto | cryptocurrency • للتنسيق والإعلان @CryptoFaneer • للشكاوى والاقتراحات @Meana2024 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptobadr |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 107,887 | +11,708 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 96,179 | -548 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 96,727 | -859 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 97,586 | -3,066 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 100,652 | -2,133 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 102,785 | -122 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 102,907 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 253,491 |
| Reactions total | 8,922 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8,922 reactions across 32 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,538 | 28.4% | |
| ❤ | 858 | 9.62% | |
| 👍 | 806 | 9.03% | |
| 🎉 | 805 | 9.02% | |
| 🥰 | 805 | 9.02% | |
| 💯 | 799 | 8.96% | |
| 🤩 | 790 | 8.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 773 | 8.66% | |
| 😍 | 736 | 8.25% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 0.056% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.034% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.022% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.022% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,922reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 اليوم: ردّت السيناتور سينثيا لوميس على الادعاءات بأن العملات المستقرة تضر بالبنوك المحلية. وأكدت أن الودائع في ازدياد، وأن التهديد الحقيقي يكمن في اندماج البنوك، وليس في قانون الشفافية. ...
🔥76💯48🤩39👍35🥰31😍29❤26❤🔥26
🔥 عاجل: باعت شركة ستراتيجي 1690 بيتكوين مقابل 108.6 مليون دولار، مما خفض حيازاتها إلى 840447 بيتكوين. العبارة: 1690 بيتكوين مقابل 108.6 مليون دولار
🔥68❤2👍1🤝1
🔥 ضخم: أنفقت بيركشاير 39.4 مليار دولار لشراء الأسهم في ستة أشهر بينما كانت تمتلك 359 مليار دولار نقدًا، ومع ذلك كتبت شيكًا بقيمة 4.8 مليار دولار لإعادة شراء أسهمها الخاصة.
🔥70
• ليش أسجل في قناة / Sinjar ؟ ❇️ محللين يعطونك أفضل الصفقات بالملّي👌 ❇️ ثقات ومعروفين بخبرتهم وتجاربهم وقوة صفقاتهم. ❇️ القناة معروفة ومدعومة من أفضل وأكبر حسابات تويتر والتلغرام المعروفين والثقات لأن المحللين معروفين ومتميزين. ❇️ مواصلين ومتابعين معكم في كل ظروف السوق بالتحديث واصطياد أفضل الفرص. ❇️ إحصائيات دقيقة بدون مبالغة في المدح لأن الصفقات تشهد ورسائل المشتركين تشهد والأهم الأرقام الواضحة أمامكم تشهد. ❇️ في ع…
🔥63❤34🎉34🥰30❤🔥28🤩27💯25👍22
✅
🔥90❤🔥39😍39🥰35❤34🎉27🤩27💯24
🚨 صناديق البيتكوين تسجل أفضل أسبوع منذ أبريل... واختراق Coldcard قد يكون نقطة التحول! بحسب EricBalchunas من Bloomberg سجلت صناديق Spot Bitcoin ETFs تدفقات أسبوعية بنحو مليار دولار، في أفضل أسبوع لها منذ أبريل. واللافت أن صناديق مثل IBIT وFBTC إلى جانب عدد من الصناديق الأخرى سجلت تدفقات داخلة في كل يوم تداول منذ اختراق Coldcard. وهنا تظهر مفارقة مثيرة: 🔹 اختراق محافظ التخزين البارد هز الثقة في الحفظ الذاتي (Self…
🔥96🥰28❤26👍25💯22🤩22🎉19😍18
🟥 مجلس الشيوخ الأمريكي يحدد 15 سبتمبر موعدًا للتصويت على قانون CLARITY لتنظيم سوق العملات الرقمية. 🟢 و زعيم الأغلبية في مجلس الشيوخ جون ثون بدأ رسميًا إجراءات إنهاء النقاش حول مشروع القانون، تمهيدًا للتصويت عليه
🔥98👍36❤32❤🔥29💯27🤩27😍26🎉23
🔥 آخر الأخبار: يقول مستخدمو منصة Polymarket إن هناك احتمالاً بنسبة 63% ألا يُغيّر الاحتياطي الفيدرالي أسعار الفائدة.
🔥90❤38👍28🥰27🎉25💯25🤩23😍22
تحديث من كوريا الشمالية: حصلت شركة Bybit على دعم قضائي أمريكي لتتبع عملية الاختراق التي بلغت قيمتها 1.5 مليار دولار أمريكي والمرتبطة بكوريا الشمالية، لكن 90% من الأموال المسروقة لا يمكن تتبعها حاليًا.
🔥69🎉43❤32👍32🤩30🥰29❤🔥27💯27
🔥 ضخم: بلغ الإنفاق الشهري على بطاقات العملات الرقمية مستوى قياسياً جديداً قدره 759 مليون دولار. أكثر من ضعف المبلغ خلال عام واحد.
🔥69🎉28💯28👍27❤26❤🔥25🥰21🤩20
🚨 نظرة معمقة: صندوق النقد الدولي يقول إن العملات المستقرة المحلية قد تدفع المزيد من المستخدمين نحو الدولار الرقمي.
🔥100👍39🎉29😍29💯25❤🔥20🥰20❤19
🇺🇸 هام: الولايات المتحدة ممولة... مؤقتًا. أقرّ مجلس الشيوخ مشروع قانون مؤقتًا لإبقاء الحكومة مفتوحة حتى 11 ديسمبر. لكن المعركة الأكبر حول الإنفاق لا تزال قائمة.
🔥102🥰35❤33💯32🎉26🤩22😍18👍16
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @cryptobadr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجتمع العملات الموثوقة” (@cryptobadr), 107,887 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptobadr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.