https://x.com/CryptoArabic10/status/2086864767407583242
❤5👌3👍3
Signed Abdo Ali

Channel
@CryptoArabic005
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,533subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001913605540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoArabic005 |
| Description | -نقدم تحليل بشكل مستمر علي >بيتكوين-إيثريوم-سولانا من سيناريو واحد فقط بدون تشتت و بدون أي حيره🔥⚡️ -نقدم توصيات بشكل مستمر علي العملات و بأهداف جنونية🐳 -الشغل الحالي أول مرة يتم تقديمه في المجتمع العربي أن شاء الله يعود عليكم بكل خير🔥⚡️ -أذكر الله |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoArabic005 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 5,533 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 5,539 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 5,538 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 5,538 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (24 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,467 |
| Reactions total | 579 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
579 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 437 | 75.5% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 6.22% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 5.70% | |
| 👌 | 30 | 5.18% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 5.01% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.691% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.691% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.518% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.345% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.173% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoArabic005. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://x.com/CryptoArabic10/status/2086864767407583242
❤5👌3👍3
Signed Abdo Ali
👀👀
🥰4👍2❤1
Signed Abdo Ali
-بينانس توهم الجميع بأن العملات بخير و السوق ممتاز ومغري للدخول من خلال صعود هذه العملات وهذا القسم الزبالة التي لا يوجد فيه أي فوليم. -عملات مثل FET XRP XLM EIGEN APT SUI SEI SOL AVAX كلهم كلهم مازالوا يتحركون عرضي و يهبطون ببطي برغم صعود البتكوين لذلك لا أحد يقيس حالة العملات أو نسبة الصعود من عملات زبالة من قسم Monitoring (( قسم تحت المراقبة))
❤28👍11
Signed Abdo Ali
📌 أغلب العملات التي تصدرت قائمة الصعود هذا الأسبوع... هي في الأصل من قسم Monitoring الخاص بالعملات المعرضة للحذف من منصة بينانس. 🤝 >لذلك لا تنخدع بالأرقام الكبيرة أو الشموع الخضراء فقط... فارتفاع السعر وحده لا يعني أن المشروع أصبح قويًا أو مناسبًا للدخول. > المؤلم أن كثيرًا من المتداولين الجدد يدخلون هذه العملات بعد موجة الصعود، دون أن يعلموا أنها تواجه مخاطر كبيرة، وقد تكون معرضة للحذف من المنصة. 📌في مثل هذه …
❤26
Signed Abdo Ali
📌 السوق ممل جدًا في الفترة الحالية. 😅 > لا البتكوين راضي يحقق الأهداف الهابطة التي ننتظرها... >ولا يعطينا إشارة واضحة تُبطل السيناريو الحالي وندخل السوق براحة. >لذلك لا أرى أي فائدة من كثرة الظهور أو طرح تحديثات كل ساعة، طالما أن المعطيات الأساسية لم تتغير. 📌ما زلت أنتظر أحد أمرين فقط: ✔️ تحقيق الأهداف الهابطة الحالية. ✔️ أو ظهور إشارة واضحة تُبطل السيناريو الهابط للبتكوين، وعندها سيكون لنا تحديث جديد ودخول…
❤23👌5
Signed Abdo Ali
📌لماذا أصر على تقديم تحليلات من "سيناريو واحد فقط"؟ >لأوفر عليك وقتك وجهدك وأمنحك "راحة البال" التامة حتي لا تتابع السوق بشكل مستمر و منها تركز علي حياتك الشخصية و عملك. >لأحميك من التشتت بين عشرات الآراء والسيناريوهات المتضاربة التي لا تضيف قيمة حقيقية ولأنقذك من "محللي التيك توك" الذين يبيعون الوهم بلا فائدة.
❤15👌9👏6🔥6🎉2
Signed Abdo Ali
📌 قد يتفق البعض مع هذا الأسلوب أو يختلف معه، وهذا أمر طبيعي. لكنني اخترت أن أقدم رؤية واحدة واضحة، بدلًا من عشرات السيناريوهات التي تربك المتابع وتشتته. > لا أبحث عن لقب، ولا عن منافسة مع أحد، ولا عن إثبات أنني الأفضل. كل ما أتمناه هو أن أكون سببًا - بعد توفيق الله - في حماية رأس مالكم، وتحقيق الربح، وتجنب الخسائر وقت انهيار الأسواق. 🌟وإذا كان هناك شيء أفتخر به، فهو ثقة من التزم بهذه الفكرة، قبل أي أرقام أو نتا…
❤25👌6🏆4
Signed Abdo Ali
📌شغلي وتحليلاتي قائمة على سيناريو واحد فقط. 💡التحليل من سيناريو واحد ليس مجرد أسلوب. بل فكرة عملت عليها سنوات، وبذلت فيها مجهودًا كبيرًا حتى وصلت إلى ما ترونه اليوم. 🌟النتائج التي تحققت حتى الآن هي ثمرة هذا الاجتهاد... أما التوفيق فهو من الله وحده.
❤17👏8
Signed Abdo Ali
-البتكوين☝️🏻☝️🏻
❤17
Signed Abdo Ali
https://x.com/i/status/2083205054828335545
🔥8❤2
Signed Abdo Ali
>لذلك يشعر البعض بالاستغراب من ضعف السوق وجفاف السيولة الحالي بل البعض الأخر يسب البتكوين و العملات البديلة... رغم أن الإشارات التحذيرية موجودة منذ فترة في أكثر من مكان. >السوق ليس البتكوين فقط... بل شبكة مترابطة من السيولة، والسندات، والعملات، والطاقة، وشهية المخاطرة العالمية. 📌وكلما اتسعت رؤيتك لما يحدث خارج سوق الكريبتو، أصبحت قراراتك داخل الكريبتو أفضل. 🤝 لا تنظر إلى الشمعة فقط... انظر إلى المشهد كاملًا.
❤28👌3
Signed Abdo Ali
📌 الجميع يركز اليوم على البتكوين فقط... بينما يتجاهل الصورة الأكبر خلف الكواليس. 🤝 💡كثيرون يتابعون كل حركة بـ1% صعودًا أو هبوطًا في البتكوين... لكنهم لا ينتبهون إلى خروج السيولة من USDT & USDC. ولا إلى صعود عوائد السندات الأمريكية لأجل 10 سنوات و30 سنة. ولا إلى ما يحدث في اليابان والين الياباني. ولا إلى صعود النفط واستمرار الضغوط في أسواق المال العالمية. ⚖️ المشكلة أن أغلب المتداولين ينظرون إلى النتيجة... …
❤30🤯3🔥2
Signed Abdo Ali
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoArabic005. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoArabiC” (@CryptoArabic005), 5,533 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoArabic005.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.