I just opened a short position #ETH Stop if closed 1h above 1903 @jack_future_crypto
👍3❤2

Channel
@YD_Cryptocurrency
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,758subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001640234563 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YD_Cryptocurrency |
| Description | أهلاً بك في القناة اللي تحلل السوق بدون تهويل، وتنشر الوعي بأسلوب بسيط واحترافي. هنا تجد : 🔹 تحليلات لحظية واتجاهات السوق 🔹 محتوى واقعي مبني على خبرة وتجربة حساباتي الرسمية للتواصل بخصوص الاعلانات https://linktr.ee/youcef_yd حساب الدعم @YD_Support |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YD_Cryptocurrency |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 13,758 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 13,765 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 13,769 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 13,771 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 13,780 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 13,790 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 13,802 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (28 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49,801 |
| Reactions total | 626 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
626 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 363 | 58.0% | |
| 👍 | 84 | 13.4% | |
| 🙏 | 39 | 6.23% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 4.47% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 3.99% | |
| 🤝 | 23 | 3.67% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 2.88% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 2.56% | |
| 🫡 | 11 | 1.76% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 1.28% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 0.799% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.799% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 626reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I just opened a short position #ETH Stop if closed 1h above 1903 @jack_future_crypto
👍3❤2
+230% profit on long position #People I'm very very happy for this trade Because many people in the channel benefited from it The next target is 0.011/0.012 @jack_future_crypto
❤11
عملة TUT ارتفعت حوالي x20 آخر اسبوع هي ضمن النظام البيئي BSC العديد من المتداولين او لنقل الاغلبية صار يفكر أن صناع السوق لما يرفعون عملة ضمن نظام بيئي محدد يعني راح يتم رفع باقي العملات على نفس النظام في المستقبل القريب للأسف هنا مربط الخيط صناع السوق راح يقومون باختيار عملة واحدة فقط و لن تستطيع معرفتها و يرفعونها عشان يبيعونها لك في القمة و ايضا يبيعون عليك عملات أخرى أنت تشوف عليها فرصة و هي راح تنخفض 50% أخر…
❤22👍13🐳1
السلام عليكم راح نغيب عليكم مدة من الزمن مر وقت طويل لم ناخذ قسط من الراحة العودة بعد اسبوع او اسبوعين ان أحيانا الله باذن الله باقي معكم المشرف الاجنبي Jack هذا حسابه : @jack_future_crypto غالبا هو يتداول فيوتشر فقط الله يوفقكم ♥️
❤27
اغلب العملات ذات الماركت كاب 50 مليون و أقل قاعدة ترتفع و وصلت حتى X4 X5 ثم بعدها دامب مباشرة اذا عندك عملة تعطيك ربح جيد في هذه الفترة لا تطمع و احجز ارباحك اول باول
❤30🙏1
30% for now on #people If you want to tack some profit here 🤑 @jack_futute_crypto
❤1
Zama بداية الصعود نحو قمة جديدة ✅
🔥9👍7❤3🐳2⚡1
Zama ممكن يبدا صعود جديد عليها و الله اعلم
❤17🐳2🔥2
البيتكوين حاليا فيه سيناريوهين ممكن يتم الهبوط إلى 61 ثم الصعود إلى 70 ثم كسر قاع 57 ( احتمال حدوثه قليل ) او يتم الهبوط من هنا مباشرة لكسر 57 (احتمال حدوثه أكبر ) صراحة اريد حدوث السيناريو اللي نسبة حدوثه أقل لكي نستفيد شوي من الصعود في كل السوق
❤16👍11🫡11🤝8🥰4
نصيحة : اي عملة تغيير الاسم و البراند الخاص بها احتمال 99% راح تعود تندرج للتصريف و فقط و لنا مثال في كل العملات اللي غيرت الاسم و البراند آخر 5 سنوات
👍26👏13❤2
هذا السيناريو احتماله ضعيف ( الاحتمال الاكبر باقي نزول ) و لكن السوق عودنا ناخذ اي احتمال و لو كان بسيط
❤24💯8🎉3🤝3
تحديث سريع : ممكن يكون البيتكوين اكتفى بقاع 57800 اللي كان قبل 3 اسابيع راح اطرح سيناريو يدعم الايجابية بعد ساعات باذن الله ♥️
❤32🎉6🙏6✍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @YD_Cryptocurrency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@YD_Cryptocurrency named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Youcef YD - العملات الرقميه 🏆🏅” (@YD_Cryptocurrency), 13,758 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YD_Cryptocurrency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.