8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,859–10,900 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:34
10,864
-4
13 Aug 2026, 04:56
10,868
-7
12 Aug 2026, 08:05
10,875
-7
11 Aug 2026, 10:47
10,882
+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:17
10,880
-9
9 Aug 2026, 09:54
10,889
-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:27
10,895
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:48
10,894
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 10,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
61 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
98,838
Reactions total
2,510
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈245
Links
≈447
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 58s
Average length
1m 58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,510 reactions across 61 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,422
56.7%
👍
480
19.1%
🔥
288
11.5%
💯
147
5.86%
👏
31
1.24%
❤🔥
28
1.12%
😢
28
1.12%
🐳
24
0.956%
😱
15
0.598%
🤩
13
0.518%
🤯
13
0.518%
🎉
9
0.359%
✍
6
0.239%
🤝
6
0.239%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 61 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Abod_Cryptocurrency. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
عملتنا الاستثمارية LINK
شارت العملة مثالي فعلاً
حاليا نقدر نشوف بكل وضوح كيف زخم الهبوط بالقيعان ضعف وكيف القيعان صارت متقاربة
ومدومك متابعني راح تعرف من تحليلاتي انه هذا نمط انعكاس صريح
حاليا بحسب تشكل القيعان الأخيرة مثل مو موضح عند السهم الأحمر
اختراق 8.90$ يعني انعكاس الاتجاه رسميا والقاع تشكل بالفعل
نحتاج حاليا الثبات فوق 9 دولار واستمرار الاتجاه الصاعد لتأكيد الحركة
استحواذ USDT
يحقق 95% من هدفنا وتحليلنا السابق
حاليا استحواذ USDT بدأ يظهر ضعف بالهيكل
تناقص زخم الصعود
قمم متقاربة
ضعف صريح باستمرار الاتجاه الصاعد
فيه احتمالية يخترق 9.3% بشي بسيط ولكن بالنسبه لنا غير مهم
لأنه الانعكاس على الشارت هذا صار حتمي ماعليه جدال
بدنا نراقب اهم مستوى حاليا 8.15% كسره
يعطيني تاكيد صريح وواضح انه انكسر الترند الصاعد على USDT وبدأ موجة هابطة
وهذا الإشارة راح تكون مبكره ونسبق الكل فيها …
من شوي لاحظت على عملة APT و SEI حققوا قيعان جديدة
لذلك قررت القي نظرة سريعة على توزيع عملاتهم وتضخمها ونشاركها معاكم
عملة APT
تقريبا باقي شهر تنتهي حصص المساهمين الاوائل والمستثمرين وراح تتخلص العملة من ضغطهم
يبقى حصه community وهو معدل تضخم شهري قليل وطبيعي
عملة SEI
مع الأسف وضعها صعب عليها فك شهري إلى 2027/8 والفك هذا يشكل حصص للمؤسسة والمستثمرين الخاصيين بالاضافه إلى الفريق
لذلك نشوف ضغط مستمر وهبوط مستمر عل…
تم تحقيق الهدف الاول على OKB
البعض ممكن ينصدم من سرعة تحقيق الهدف حتى أنا مثلك ماشفت إلا وصلني إشعار اول هدف تم
افضل استثمار بعد البتكوين هو عملات المنصات
واهم ميزة فيهم مايتأثروا لا بتلاعب السوق ولا باستحواذ البتكوين
المنطقة الحالية على البتكوين $BTC
منطقة تجميع بامتياز 👌 إياك تهملها
وراح تلاحظ بعد تحليلاتنا الأخيرة
انتشار كثير كلام على انه القاع والبير ماركت اقل من شهرين وينتهي 😉
عملة ATS
ارتفعت 25%
بعد توصياتي ومنشوري الاخير
واتوقع هذا البداية
الفريق شغال على كل الاصعدة بدون توقف شغال تطوير بالمشروع وحملات كبيرة ماتتوقف للحفاظ على سعر العملة ورفعها باستمرار
هذا البداية ⚪️
🔥 تطور ضخم في مشروع ATS 🔥
🟢تم إطلاق WATS WALLET
وهي محفظة تدعم عدة شبكات ومعظم رسوم التحويل راح تكون باستخدام ATS
💻 وهذا يعطي استخدام فعلي للعملة
والي اعتبره معلومات حصرية قليل الي يعرفها ✨
نهاية الشهر هذا فيه بوت SONS BOT يتواجد فيه حوالي مليون مستخدم نشط على تيليجرام
يحتاجوا لاستخدام محفظة WATS لسحب عملاتهم وإيداع على الأقل 5 دولار من ATS
يعني نتكلم عن ملايين الدولارات راح تدخل ATS
احيانن افضل طريقة تداول هي…
يوم من الهبوط على البتكوين
الوقت المتوقع لنهاية البير ماركت 365 يوم
مثل ماصار في بير ماركت 2014-2018-2022
نتكلم عن اقل من شهرين والأغلب مو منتبه ولا متجهز للمرحلة القادمة ✍️🔥
كل العملات الي صعدت آخر يومين ارتفاع جنوني
اليوم هبوط جنوني
لأنه من الأصل كان الارتفاع وهمي وتلاعب مثل عملة $TUT $BMT
واليوم نهارت عملة $ONE بسبب اختراق حصل
والبعض يلومني ليش رايح استثمر بعملات ثقيلة
$BTC $ETH $SOL $BNB
عملات ثقيلة محترمة افضل من هل مهزلة
❤26💯7👏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @Abod_Cryptocurrency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NaiF CHarT @cryptomena1 · 106,149 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
مجتمع العملات الموثوقة @cryptobadr · 109,002 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
EA Trading @EATrading1 · 253,433 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTOHALAL كريبتو حلال @cr_halal · 108,488 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎 @crypto_currencyME · 106,326 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Abu shahin crypto @Abushahincrypto · 153,504 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abod Crypto” (@Abod_Cryptocurrency), 10,864 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abod_Cryptocurrency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.