Channel
@lafichart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,618subscribers
-91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216496535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lafichart |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lafichart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 35,618 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 35,629 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 35,644 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 35,654 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 35,666 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 35,690 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 35,705 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 35,709 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (24 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,260 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🚨🟢 هدوء البتكوين الحالي يتبعه صعود قوي عامودي يتخطى فيه 74K ( مبدأيا ) بإذن الله قريبا 👈 مع انتعاشة جماعية للسوق ،،، من يستغلها راح تنتعش محفظته و تتحسن بشكل سريع خلال فترة بسيطة ركز في التحديثات القادمة ، الطرح حاليا قليل و واضح جدا لانه لا مجال لتشتيت المتابع 🌹
BTC هنا البتكوين انتهى من المنطقة 1 منذ طرح التحليل ✅️ و وصل تقريبا الى منطقة 2 بصعود ( بسيط ) مثل ما وضحت ✅️ 🟢 الآن بإذن الله متجهين لتحقيق التحليل كامل و تجاوز منطقة 74K بصعود ( قوي و سريع ) انطلاقا من المنطقة الحالية 👈 لا تنتظر من البتكوين قيعان أقل ،،، لن تحصل عليها 🌹 👈 تحديث كامل لوضع العملات في الأيام القادمة مع تحرك البتكوين ⏳️
السلام عليكم تحديث للبتكوين بعد قليل ...
BTC من ينادي بقيعان جديدة للبتكوين عند 30K او غيرها من الأرقام ... ركز بهذا الشيء البسيط لكنه يعني الكثير 👈 متوسط 200 أسبوع صامد و حمل البتكوين في هذا القاع ... تجهيز و استعداد لموجات الصعود القادمة 🟢 القاع واضح و لكن العيون مشتته بسبب الضغط النفسي اكرر ما اقوله من 5 شهور 👈 قاع البتكوين النهائي تحقق عند 60K و الصعود راح يتسارع في الأيام القادمة 🔥 ...
اللهم صلِّ على سيدنا محمد و على آله و صحبه أجمعين صلو على رسول الله ❤️ اللهم أعز الإسلام و المسلمين في كل بقاع الأرض
BTC على الصورة الأصغر : حصلنا على موجة صعود بسيطه و صححت بشكل بسيط 👈 الآن جاهز لقفزة لما فوق 67K في الأيام القادمة بإذن الله 🟢 الكلام و التحليلات واضحة ما فيها احتمالين ،،، تابع التحديثات القادمة بما يخص تحرك العملات القادم استبشروا بالخير 🌹
BTC تحديث على الصورة الكبيرة : قاع ال 60K أثبت فعاليته و تم اعادة اختباره بنجاح 👈 آخر حركة كانت ( كسر كاذب ) و من ثم العودة فوقه بشكل سريع ،،، هذا السلوك من أشهر الأشكال الإنعكاسية في الأسواق 🟢 لذلك نأكد انه انتهينا من المسار الهابط ( كله ) و تحقق القاع عند 60K ✅️ يتبع ...
ظلم للمنتخب المصري بعد تقديم مباراة عالمية … مبروك للجميع هذا الظهور المشرف و هاردلك على النتيجة
🟢 بداية أسبوع تداول جديد توقعي : بإذن الله أسبوع خير و انتعاش للسوق البتكوين جاهز لتجاوز 67K هذا الأسبوع ،،، و تحركات قوية في الإيثر و العملات نتابع ...
🚨 بداية الأسبوع قلت انه هذا اسبوع وداع القاع ، و تم ✅️ الأرقام الأيام الماضية انسى انك تشوفها مرة اخرى لفترة طويلة السوق بدأ يتحرك و الإيثر و البتكوين تحركهم ممتاز جدا انتظر تحديث الأسبوع الجديد غدا 🫵
اليوم إغلاق اسبوعي ، انتهينا من فترة الهدوء بكرة نعود للآكشن بإذن الله 🔥⏳️
🔥🔥🔥 ألف مبروووك للمنتخب المغربي العبور الى الدور القادم كأس عالم من دون المغرب ما يصلحش ( بصوت الشوالي ) 🤝
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @lafichart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,109 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAFI CHART” (@lafichart), 35,618 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lafichart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.