Channel
@saeedc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,342subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001179285836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @saeedc @saeedcoins |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saeedc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 1,342 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,342 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 1,345 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 1,347 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,349 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 43.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saeedc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2025 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Gram ← TON: ماذا يعني هذا لمحفظتك اعتبارًا من اليوم، سيتم عرض TON الخاص بك باسم Gram بشعار واسم جديدين كل شيء آخر، مثل رصيدك وعنوان محفظتك، يبقى دون تغيير — لا يلزم اتخاذ أي إجراء. تظل عمليات الإيداع والسحب كما هي دون تأثر. لماذا Gram: اقترح بافيل دوروف إعادة تسمية TON إلى Gram، لكنه ترك القرار للمجتمع، وصوّت المجتمع لصالح ذلك. اقرأ المزيد. عاد الاسم. يبدأ فصل جديد. ⚠️ إذا عرض عليك أي موقع أو بوت أو رابط المساعد…
👍1
Signed Saeed سعيد
ستكون الفرصة مواتية لشراء تجميعي في العملات القوية : البيتكوين الايثريوم السولانا عملة باينانس بالتوفيق اخوان
Signed Saeed سعيد
BTC 1M الزعيم يحترم نموذج البوق الذي رسمناه منذ أكثر من سنة ...حيث تم من خلاله توقع الهبوط بعذ ملامسته فوق وبلوغ الزعيم لل 120 الف ...الان يحاول الارتداد من منتصف النموذج ..في حال كسره فوارد جدا العودة الى الضلع السفلي للبوق كأسوء سيناريو متوقع وبالتالي ممكن يلامس 34-36 الف تقريبا خصوصا بعد كسر منطقة الدعم عند 44-41 الف تقريبا... لن نستعجل الامر ..وسنتابع سيناريو الهبوط كيف سيتم و كيف سيتفاعل مع المناطق الداعمة .... …
👏3
Signed Saeed سعيد
هناك مشكله في التحويل والاستقبال لعملة تون في باينسس
Signed Saeed سعيد
🔥 حرق أكثر من 8 ملايين دولار من البيتكوين إلى الأبد أمس، تم حرق أكثر من 107 بيتكوين (BTC) بقيمة تتجاوز 8.2 مليون دولار، بعد أن قام شخص بإرسال 5 معاملات إلى عنوان حرق البيتكوين: 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 ويُعرف هذا العنوان بأنه من أشهر عناوين الحرق في شبكة البيتكوين، حيث لا يوجد له مفتاح خاص معروف، مما يعني أن أي عملات تُرسل إليه تُفقد بشكل دائم ولا يمكن استعادتها أو إنفاقها مرة أخرى. 🧐 هل كان ذلك خطأً مكلفًا، أ…
😐2
Signed Saeed سعيد
تم البيع الله يبارك للمشتري #Sold @ S7777 https://fragment.com/username/ s7777 @ x7777 https://fragment.com/username/ x7777
Signed Saeed سعيد
BTC 1D اغلاق يومي بهذا الشكل ينذر بمزيد من الهبوط ...المنطقة الصفراء هي التي يمكن ان توقف الهبوط إن حدث ...وممكن تكون منطقة ارتداد على الفريمات الصغرى
❤1👍1
Signed Saeed سعيد
Btc USD daily chart updates Correction ended at 111 108 zone. Up trend lines and channel are established and confirmed. Resume the uptrend to test 132 133 level Then resume the rally to target 142 in late December and 148 in January 2026
❤3👍2
Signed Saeed سعيد
للتوثيق البيتكوين الان 120 الف . احنا في نهاية الدورة رضيت او لم ترضى و نصيحة لوجه الله اي صعود خلال الفترة القصيره القادمه هو للتخارج و لا تكون Exit loquidity مهما كان انتشار و قوة الاخبار الايجابيه و قوة وزخم الصعود خلال الربع الاخير من عام 2025 و لا تطمع و خذها مني كلمة و اعقلها و اجرى علي الله و بكل ثقة بالله و وضوح عام 2026 سلبي علي كافة الاسواق امريكي بيتكوين ذهب . (( احذر احذر احذر )) اللهم قد بلغت اللهم فاشهد…
👍7
Signed Saeed سعيد
https://t.me/boost/SAEEDx
Signed Saeed سعيد
btc usd weekly chart updates corective reaction stated and now testing the 114 support level. targets of the correction expected : 111 k @ 9 oct 2025 in case of deeper correction then target support expected : 105 k if extended correction happens then it will end at expected date of 10 jan 2026 the overall trend is up and will be resumed after this corrective phase end and targeting 144 k and 173 -180 k
🔥1
Signed Saeed سعيد
eth usd daily chart updates نموذج القمتين قد تحقق بالفعل والان في مرحلة الحركة الهبطة والمتوقع انها عرضية غير عميقة اهم مستويات الدعم عند3000- 3050 متوقع ان تنتهي في اخر شهر 8 واوائل شهر ليدخل في مرحلة تجميع صغيرة عند اختبار السعر من الموفينج افريدج المرسومبالشارت وتلقيه الدعم منه ليوفر فرص شراء قوية تستهدف مقاومات 4500 و 5000 و 5500 مبدئيا ليحاول بعدها استهداف ال 6800-7000
🔥1
Signed Saeed سعيد
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saeedc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 329,457 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💸 الأكاديمية العربية للتداول 💸” (@saeedc), 1,342 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saeedc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.