Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Заметки опытного hr✍️

Channel

Заметки опытного hr✍️

@zametki_opitnogo_hr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,104subscribers

-234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622646265
TypeChannel
Username@zametki_opitnogo_hr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zametki_opitnogo_hr

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,10410,33810,2217 August 2026 — 10,338 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,338 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,335 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,331 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,309 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,303 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,296 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,290 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,282 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,277 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,278 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,271 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,254 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,252 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,230 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,227 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,212 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,206 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,202 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,199 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,194 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,181 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,167 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,158 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,149 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,147 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,133 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,104 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,069–10,373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 12:5710,104-29
19 Sept 2026, 00:1910,133-14
16 Sept 2026, 18:2210,147-2
14 Sept 2026, 23:3710,149-9
13 Sept 2026, 07:1710,158-9
11 Sept 2026, 07:4010,167-14
8 Sept 2026, 11:3710,181-13
5 Sept 2026, 08:4010,194-5
3 Sept 2026, 13:2210,199-3
2 Sept 2026, 10:2310,202-4
1 Sept 2026, 08:1710,206-6
31 Aug 2026, 05:5410,212-3
30 Aug 2026, 07:2510,215-6
29 Aug 2026, 04:1310,221-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:1310,227-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:0710,230-7
26 Aug 2026, 07:0310,237-15
25 Aug 2026, 07:1210,252-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:0810,254-9
22 Aug 2026, 14:0310,263first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

376 reactions across 38 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15842.0%
👍10929.0%
🔥8121.5%
👏82.13%
🥰82.13%
💯30.798%
🤯30.798%
😁20.532%
😢20.532%
🤔20.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zametki_opitnogo_hr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC159 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

❓Знаете, сколько зарабатывает HR-директор в крупной компании? Потолок — за 1,2 млн ₽ в месяц 💡Собрала обзор рынка HR-профессий 2025️⃣–2026️⃣: зарплаты по всем уровням (от рекрутера до директора), спрос, тренды — со ссылками на источники. Как и обещала - забирайте 👇 и пишите в комментариях: HR умирает или перерождается?

❤1👍1🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC195 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😊😊😊| КЕЙС: хороший специалист оказался токсичным для команды. Можно ли было увидеть это заранее? Недавно разбирала кейс, который, думаю, знаком многим HR👇 В компанию приходит сильный специалист: опытный, быстро въезжает в процессы, делает результат за троих. Руководитель счастлив: «Наконец-то нашли человека, который реально умеет работать». А через полгода команда начинает выдыхаться😴 Люди перестают спорить на вст…

🔥7❤3👍3

25 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3

25 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC195 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️❤️| 🙂🙂🙂: если кандидат согласился на меньшую зарплату, он будет более лояльным Очень опасная логика, которая иногда звучит примерно так: «Ну раз он готов получать меньше рынка, значит, ему очень нужна именно наша компания. Будет держаться за место». А вот и нет😍 Я бы вообще разделила здесь лояльность, мотивацию и финансовую готовность терпеть. Это три совершенно разные вещи. Кандидат может согласиться на за…

❤4👍2🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC195 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😊😊😊😊| Почему люди остаются на нелюбимой работе намного дольше, чем планировали❓ Я часто замечаю: решение «я ухожу» человек принимает задолго до самого ухода. Сначала: «Ещё немного потерплю». Потом: «Сейчас не время». А потом внезапно проходит год. Почему так происходит❓ 1️⃣ Мы привыкаем к дискомфорту. То, что сначала казалось невыносимым, постепенно превращается в «ну, в целом терпимо». Плохой руководитель - «у …

❤7🔥5🥰3

21 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC248 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😊😊😊😊😊| Почему кандидат успешно прошёл все этапы отбора, но проиграл на финальном согласовании бюджета? Кандидат прошёл все этапы отбора. Скрининг - отлично. Интервью - отлично. Тестовое - отлично. Финал - «берём». А потом: «Не можем согласовать бюджет». 📌И вот здесь есть важный HR-инсайт: кандидат может проиграть не потому, что он слишком дорогой. А потому, что бизнес ещё не понял, насколько сильно ему нужен имен…

❤6👍4🔥4🤯1

21 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC243 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Как сегодня управлять командами в новой реальности? 18 сентября в программу НРФ Регионы впервые включён трек «Управление персоналом». Эксперты обсудят, как находить и удерживать сильных специалистов, развивать собственные команды и выбирать между наймом готового сотрудника и его развитием внутри компании. В программе — дискуссия «Вырастить нельзя нанять: почему укрепление бизнеса начинается с развития команды» и…

❤4👏2🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC264 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

💡В комментариях к опросу ловите гайд "Что внедрить с помощью ИИ в подборе персонала" ❗️Обзор рынка труда: HR-профессии в России выложу на следующей неделе. 😍 А сейчас мне очень интересно - кто меня читает 👇

  1. Ищу работу в HR33%
  2. Нанимаю / строю HR-функцию21%
  3. Расту в профессии, хочу зарплату выше29%
  4. Я не из HR, но тема интересна29%
  5. Достиг потолка в HR - смотрю альтернативы роста25%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC248 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤4

19 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC274 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😊😊😊😊| почему человек принял оффер, но продолжает ходить по собеседованиям? Казалось бы: оффер принял - значит, выбрал компанию. Но не всегда. Иногда человек принимает оффер, чтобы снизить тревогу, а не потому, что действительно определился. Пока работы нет - страшно: «А вдруг меня больше никуда не возьмут?» Оффер эту тревогу снимает. И появляется возможность искать дальше уже спокойно: «Работа у меня есть. Тепер…

❤7👍4🔥4🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC289 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️ | Почему компании снова начали ценить офисную работу❓ Еще пару лет назад казалось, что офисы скоро останутся только в фильмах про 2019 год. Удаленка победила. Гибрид стал новой нормой. А многие компании начали сдавать лишние площади. Но в 2026 году я все чаще вижу обратную тенденцию: работодатели снова возвращают сотрудников в офис. И дело совсем не в том, что руководители вдруг перестали доверять людям. П…

❤7🔥7👍6

14 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC292 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

❓ Какие HR-процессы в подборе персонала можно автоматизировать (уже автоматизированы в вашей компании) с помощью ИИ?

  1. 1️⃣Все внешние коммуникации с кандидатами30%
  2. 2️⃣Адаптация персонала20%
  3. 3️⃣Проведение собеседований5%
  4. 4️⃣Внутренние коммуникации5%
  5. 5️⃣ Поиск кандидатов в интернете45%
  6. 6️⃣Генерация текстов вакансий85%
  7. 7️⃣Оценка кандидатов30%
  8. 8️⃣Ничего нельзя. Это неэффективно в подборе20%

The shares total 240%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @zametki_opitnogo_hr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

💡В комментариях к опросу ловите гайд "Что внедрить с помощью ИИ в подборе персонала" ❗️Обзор рынка труда: HR-профессии в России выложу на следующей неделе. 😍 А сейчас мне очень интересно - кто меня читает 👇

  1. Ищу работу в HR33%
  2. Нанимаю / строю HR-функцию21%
  3. Расту в профессии, хочу зарплату выше29%
  4. Я не из HR, но тема интересна29%
  5. Достиг потолка в HR - смотрю альтернативы роста25%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

❓ Какие HR-процессы в подборе персонала можно автоматизировать (уже автоматизированы в вашей компании) с помощью ИИ?

  1. 1️⃣Все внешние коммуникации с кандидатами30%
  2. 2️⃣Адаптация персонала20%
  3. 3️⃣Проведение собеседований5%
  4. 4️⃣Внутренние коммуникации5%
  5. 5️⃣ Поиск кандидатов в интернете45%
  6. 6️⃣Генерация текстов вакансий85%
  7. 7️⃣Оценка кандидатов30%
  8. 8️⃣Ничего нельзя. Это неэффективно в подборе20%

The shares total 240%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Альфа-Курс
@alfa_course · 20,674
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
topcareer
@topcareerschool · 23,425
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 18 September 2026
Управление персоналом | hr, карьера, кадры
@secrets_hr · 21,849
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Эйчаргейт| Перезагрузка
@hrgate · 57,023
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Вакансии в ЕКАТЕРИНБУРГЕ
@Rabota_Ekaterinburgs · 34,676
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Пригодится! 🍎 Библиотека для HR
@savetoreadlater · 22,278
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Авито Работа
@avito_jobs · 21,452
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Полезное для Кадровика
@trud_krut · 23,514
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Живое обучение
@prolearning · 20,688
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 September 2026
Зайдите в кадры!
@kadrovoedelojournal · 30,922
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 6 September 2026
HR-аналитика
@hranalitycs · 34,128
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Заметки опытного hr✍️” (@zametki_opitnogo_hr), 10,104 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zametki_opitnogo_hr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.