Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 31 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @en_wk. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
129 measurements spanning 98 days, net +48,669. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 833,849–916,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 129
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 14:17
892,095
-573
11 Nov 2026, 10:18
892,668
+832
10 Nov 2026, 10:49
891,836
+551
9 Nov 2026, 14:19
891,285
+216
8 Nov 2026, 21:46
891,069
+39
8 Nov 2026, 09:34
891,030
-595
7 Nov 2026, 15:11
891,625
+298
7 Nov 2026, 04:08
891,327
-230
6 Nov 2026, 13:40
891,557
+328
6 Nov 2026, 00:50
891,229
+179
5 Nov 2026, 13:30
891,050
+472
4 Nov 2026, 22:49
890,578
-488
4 Nov 2026, 16:57
891,066
-91
4 Nov 2026, 00:08
891,157
-680
3 Nov 2026, 17:56
891,837
+237
2 Nov 2026, 22:09
891,600
+420
2 Nov 2026, 17:46
891,180
+931
2 Nov 2026, 00:45
890,249
-50
1 Nov 2026, 15:36
890,299
+601
1 Nov 2026, 00:36
889,698
first reading
Engagement
844 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.37%
avg views ÷ 892,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,200
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 844 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
844 (10 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
2,160,946
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
15 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 844 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yypyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 844 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 102 posts held from the last 30 days (1.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حين يخسر الإنسان
توقعاته في شَخصه المُفضل
لا أحد يستطيع
أن يعيده الى طمانينته
أتجاه كل شيء
Showing the 12 most recent of 844 posts we hold for @yypyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yypyy edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ستوريات حب صور خلفيات 🤍 @SS2lS · 180,593 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
عين العراق ⭕️ اخبار عاجلة @iraq11e · 309,543 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
شوكلاتۿᰔ. @r_iqo0 · 34,177 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 2 September 2026
موقع عطلة - الرسمية @bjnoo · 76,397 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
- مجرة وسط السماء 🖤 . @majarrahsky · 92,551 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
صمت المشاعر @zzssz3 · 181,870 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
حُـزن. @ececeo · 186,787 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
حنان @English_Hanan1 · 194,738 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
ممكن تجي ؟ @ei_n0 · 195,796 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
أدعية ، أذكار ، صدقة جارية @zzizi · 249,475 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
محمود درويش 🇵🇸 @TTTpT · 252,098 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
غريب الأطوار @Yosmo · 270,358 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
حب الله 🦋. @SSIE2 · 46,665 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
♡ اقتباسات ♡ هادئہَ ♡ @zz_d8 · 78,575 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
copy_meast @Copy_MEast · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
VIP FX توصيات فوركس اشارات ذهب @i4_3Q · 220,920 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
شبكة أبن الغربية ألتعليمية @ET_ETu · 214,282 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
اقتباسات ، كبرياء ، غرور أنثى @gsvsvw · 269,237 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
اقتباسات لنفسي . @V0VVV1 · 312,094 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
نصوص ، خواطر ، اقتباسات ، صورة من كتاب @uv_43 · 196,741 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
آوتار. @J777E · 257,424 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
اقتباسات انجيلي ꕤ . كلام بنات نصوص @en3_g · 376,838 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
- نُصوص عميّقة 🖤، @NNNAA · 433,428 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
اقتباسات كُتب روايات. @TTTTpT · 470,792 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 176 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كِتمان اشعار افتار عبارات” (@yypyy), 892,095 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yypyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
