يلا يلا بلايسر 😍

Channel
كِتمان اشعار افتار عبارات
@yypyy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · View velocity · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
851,137subscribers
+7,711 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001418679235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @yypyy @zc_yl |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yypyy |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 851,137 | -853 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 851,990 | +660 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 851,330 | +271 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 851,059 | +1,229 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 849,830 | +17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 849,813 | +1,764 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 848,049 | +123 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 847,926 | +2,154 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 845,772 | +704 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 845,068 | +1,582 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 843,486 | +129 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 843,357 | -189 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 843,546 | +204 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 843,342 | -84 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 843,426 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 843,426 | first reading |
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.55%
- avg views ÷ 851,137 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,700
- 126 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 126
- of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 129 (10 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,737,496 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2797247 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC | 15 minutes – 5 minutes old | 724 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2797257 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC | 15 minutes – 5 minutes old | 165 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2797236 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC | 225 minutes – 55 minutes old | 1,220 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 25 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2797216 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC | 3under a minute – 65 minutes old | 4,760 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 4,475 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 27 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2797226 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC | 1under a minute – under a minute old | 1 viewno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2797206 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC | 210 minutes – 45 minutes old | 1,310 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 21 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2797176 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC | 220 minutes – 55 minutes old | 4,880 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 21 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2797166 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC | 2under a minute – 30 minutes old | 1,060 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 15 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 129 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yypyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 129 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
تعارف شباب وبنات دك ونسه 👇👇 https://t.me/+wugoLrjIeZ8yMDIy
https://t.me/+rZrZmujZi4oyZmFi
من قوه النسوان علك الجات خرب بجمالجن 😭🔥🔥🔥
غــزل للعيون الحلوة 🤎
كروب بس حتيت نريد شباب
https://t.me/+wk5jKWKmW1A2NDgx
صور محادثات وهميه 😐
📶📶 اهلج ميقبلون تنشرين صورتج وتريدين تغيرين صورة بروفايلج و ماعندج صورة تعجبج ✈️ https://t.me/ooaooos/152423 https://t.me/ooaooos/152058 تعالـي لهالقنـاه اشـتركوا 🤍
🟢صـور مقالب بالمستشفى😂😔
https://t.me/+wugoLrjIeZ8yMDIy
زحمه وبنات تكعد تصير لوتي وهيه حاره وسبلت عطلان ولهام اكل خصم وتعاركو شمس وهلالي وهلالي ضايج لان بيتهم وكع وحترك وماتت والدته وابوه زوج بيوم الثالث من فاتحه امه
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @yypyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yypyy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@HH_H7S · 279,320#1
@SS2lS · 191,739#2
@TTTTpT · 499,438#3
@PVVVV · 816,899#4
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382#5
@en3_g · 378,341#6
@myiyia · 191,298#7
@AE_Hl · 112,754#8
@Yosmo · 286,231#9
@TTTpT · 267,031#10
@Nh_NE · 83,970#11
@NNNAA · 459,271#12
@yatmanqalbi · 105,102#13
@uuuuxcc · 207,147#14
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781#15
@PPPJP · 3,255,955#16
@IIU4T · 77,343#17
@STORS5 · 292,775#18
@m3im3ii · 110,206#19
@Diilen · 114,682#20
@lRlTI · 74,398#21
@letna_jeran · 457,270#22
@ERT8l · 130,301#23
@ececeo · 198,793#24
@cf67z · 89,016#25
@afQ55 · 126,576#26
@c8orl · 45,849#27
@rr_rrora · 184,224#28
@vc6Il · 132,607#29
@unfor2 · 254,083#30
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428#31
@vvpvvv1 · 104,063#32
@ASEEEMM · 385,266#33
@kwknss · 91,575#34
@MLLLM33 · 103,837#35
@sdqgii · 31,891#36
@Narla2 · 70,698#37
@thrthrat97 · 153,368#38
@nnZnn · 337,967#39
@UIOIU0 · 107,908#40
@kooora_land · 23,377#41
@HiEiND · 76,052#42
@kkkkkkkhvc · 17,840 (as read 8 August 2026)#43
@nrrd3 · 65,686#44
@iraq11e · 324,342#45
@oee_eee · 52,774#46
@nr0lll · 84,465#47
@FY_XG · 114,358#48
@M1140 · 101,068#49
@lAlMosahfl · 770,523#50
@smr120h · 107,954#51
@t88q1 · 42,070#52
@maho2023zhi · 3,181#53
@OOIIIEEE · 56,291#54
@Shamse01 · 34,147#55
@zno_42 · 57,396#56
@ksa_gigi · 15,311 (as read 8 August 2026)#57
@zzizi · 265,352#58
@zx_n7 · 938,138 (as read 8 August 2026)#59
@YYYYD · 1,713,531#60
@gsvsvw · 285,572#61
@NO_6C · 33,441#62
@zzssz3 · 193,533#63
@J777E · 274,896#64
@fg_bz · 73,633#65
@asxtye · 55,309#66
@cf67c · 44,136#67
@FCB_V · 96,793#68
@trrteb · 68,014#69
@mtd7knish · 234,276#70
@ei_n0 · 211,138#71
@op_35 · 308,213#72
@Di8rE · 119,863#73
@NNNN0I · 11,965#74
@English_Hanan1 · 208,763#75
@Lne_8 · 138,136#76
@nscsz · 89,589#77
@zzuzz · 873,089#78
@iraqed4 · 3,476,934#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SS2lS · 191,739
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@iraq11e · 324,342
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzssz3 · 193,533
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@ececeo · 198,793
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@English_Hanan1 · 208,763
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@ei_n0 · 211,138
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@zzizi · 265,352
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@TTTpT · 267,031
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@Yosmo · 286,231
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@Copy_MEast · 228,584
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@i4_3Q · 240,425
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@ET_ETu · 243,326
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@gsvsvw · 285,572
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@V0VVV1 · 331,429
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@uv_43 · 205,985
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@J777E · 274,896
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@en3_g · 378,341
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@NNNAA · 459,271
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@TTTTpT · 499,438
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@uv_42 · 207,080
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@unfor2 · 254,083
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@E_EEN · 286,595
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@STORS5 · 292,775
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@myiyia · 191,298
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 99 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كِتمان اشعار افتار عبارات” (@yypyy), 851,137 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yypyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.