يلا ميخالف قابل اول مرة نريد شي وميصير .

Channel
شمسِين .
@vc6Il
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
140,396subscribers
+8,037 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001914656528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vc6Il |
| Description | الـحِزن حـاضِني چـي حِــلوة . لأعلاناتكُم : @DClBBl |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vc6Il |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:10 | 140,396 | +189 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 140,207 | +370 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:58 | 139,837 | +188 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:00 | 139,649 | -28 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:58 | 139,677 | +225 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 139,452 | +123 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:18 | 139,329 | +155 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:40 | 139,174 | +695 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:18 | 138,479 | +951 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 137,528 | +224 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 137,304 | -24 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 137,328 | +341 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 136,987 | +312 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 136,675 | +160 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 136,515 | +216 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 136,299 | +224 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 136,075 | +210 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:36 | 135,865 | +71 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 135,794 | +497 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 135,297 | first reading |
Engagement
370 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.1%
- avg views ÷ 140,396 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18,300
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 370 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 370 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,669,284 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 626
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 41
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 16
- of 370 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 7
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vc6Il. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 370 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 91 posts held from the last 30 days (1.10%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ماجَد المهندس
ما تلگه اليعَزك مثلي هيهات اني لشوفتك ربيت العيّون
شفت هواي عيون بس عيّونك أحلاهن
:
اكو بنية بعدها محتاجتها لو احذف ؟
كلام لحبيبج 11/11 🙈💕
خـــلفيات لفونچ 😂🥹♥️
رجعت أبجي مرة ثانية على شغلات مو بأيدي أغيرها وجنت أني السبب بـ أختيارها !
اكو بنية بعدها محتاجتها لو احذف ؟
منو اكثر شاعر تحب تسمعة :
ناريّ ما تطفىٰ ولا نارك طفت
Showing the 12 most recent of 370 posts we hold for @vc6Il. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @vc6Il as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 6.9 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@iT64i · 78,8425 postsدَيرة هَلي .
@Mzajyati · 31,1663 postsلمة وردية 𐙚.
@NNM_JN · 18,2133 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,4942 postsMooD :
@DicciD · 16,3841 postحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 78,2491 postقُطرس :
@Qotrss · 46,0421 postاني والدنيا
@Qotrsss · 20,5901 postStory :
@Story21r · 3,1531 postTrue :
@Trruee6 · 13,6581 postازياء تولاي للملابس 🛍️369
@afyvib · 4,4291 postعتاب
@bggcp · 41,7941 postبيت الأنوثة .
@ci1rrr · 21,8131 postمشاعُر عّراقيَة .
@csrie · 88,5721 postازياء توليب 👚.
@lMiMiiM · 11,2461 postپـغدآد🤎
@mdk2je · 1,8541 postسمسم ستور
@rd1rn · 1,1101 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Nh_NE · 83,25224 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,19618 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 55,94215 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,9908 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,7897 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@cliches0 · 16,7925 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 116,5725 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 78,2495 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,5854 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 117,1444 postsمَشاعر ألك
@tl1ll · 56,3244 postsالقرآن طريقي
@ee7xv · 25,5713 postsريلز :
@iiReeL · 10,4793 postsReal :
@No0ii · 36,4693 postsجاا وكلبي .
@nscsz · 82,3943 postsمُلهَم
@TSsiS · 81,6603 postsعُزلة المُهتدين .
@zz_zzml · 82,5443 postsMooD :
@DicciD · 16,3842 postsالسلام عليكم :
@fccbma · 38,6722 postsإقتباسات مترجمة
@HH_H7S · 263,2842 postsمَلاذُ العَبدْ .
@I2i0l · 100,9142 postsريبوست
@iibost · 64,7032 postsPov :
@povv4 · 128,0342 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@EUEX3 · 106,9179 postsأنتهينا
@rrrr_srr · 18,7287 posts5:15
@iT64i · 78,8425 postsبيت الأنوثة .
@ci1rrr · 21,8133 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 116,5723 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 117,1443 postsحَچي الرّوح
@MCCXXll · 14,0523 postsوهَج
@MLLLM33 · 108,3413 postsسمسم ستور
@rd1rn · 1,1103 postsStory :
@Story21r · 3,1533 postsمُلهَم
@TSsiS · 81,6603 postsازياء تولاي للملابس 🛍️369
@afyvib · 4,4292 postsمُتجر بنيـن 🩷
@dgnaib · 6,2742 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,5852 postsحَزن اهلنا .
@esecs · 64,4562 postsحرفياً :
@literally_0 · 28,4322 postsمَشاعر ألك
@tl1ll · 56,3242 postsبوُتْ تَحّمِيل ستُورِياتْ اَنْسٰتّا .
@TQQ2bot · 25,1562 postsميمز طاكين
@tttakn · 18,2222 postsعتاب
@bggcp · 41,7941 postZahra's kitchen 🍪
@rrrirrii · 23,6501 post6:16
@rti_ol · 22,9211 postTrue :
@Trruee6 · 13,6581 postميمز متكئكئين
@warlann · 12,1621 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vc6Il named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 27 October 2026 – 27 October 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,168#1
@asxtye · 51,066#2
@spwnrz · 61,085#3
@Kd_kla1 · 43,744#4
@rsr2z · 44,403#5
@ERT8l · 128,841#6
@lRlTI · 76,434#7
@SlSl2l · 124,898#8
@cf67c · 44,990#9
@cckkxs · 15,510#10
@FCB_V · 89,595#11
@IIU4T · 73,117#12
@citystop2 · 25,734#13
@Diilen · 116,572#14
@povv4 · 128,034#15
@c8orl · 1#16
@OOIIIEEE · 56,196#17
@afQ55 · 124,179#18
@T_16_7 · 47,670#19
@llllTBi · 10,398#20
@MOOQQ55 · 78,249#21
@lBIBPl · 34,057#22
@HiEiND · 70,060#23
@cxarc · 23,081#24
@Narla2 · 71,163#25
@lAlMosahfl · 781,423#26
@r5zoe · 3,626#27
@Yllh7 · 16,668#28
@NxNkwk · 3,076#29
@UIOIU0 · 102,919#30
@nrrd3 · 61,405#31
@ff2tm · 45,567#32
@TSsiS · 81,660#33
@M1140 · 106,925#34
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,202#35
@szovl · 11,222#36
@G33MM · 10,232#37
@sxserc · 27,282#38
@Geoooom · 68,276#39
@rrqeaa · 13,893#40
@bbosha16 · 5,714#41
@NO_6C · 31,777#42
@Nh_NE · 83,252#43
@HH_H7S · 263,284#44
@GW554 · 636#45
@Firat25 · 12,866#46
@zzzzzz · 2,008,395#47
@asawer_hussein22 · 141,261#48
@t88q1 · 38,934#49
@PPPJP · 3,188,962#50
@IIU4F · 71,059#51
@DRT86 · 41,806#52
@Lne_8 · 135,987#53
@K27R99 · 32,614#54
@m3im3ii · 114,729#55
@Al_Re313 · 1,489#56
@nrrd1 · 37,244#57
@AE_Hl · 109,842#58
@yatmanqalbi · 101,528#59
@mtd7knish · 220,647#60
@LZDT5 · 4,780#61
@zt_tz2 · 28,847#62
@Qiise · 21,546#63
@hayaa_0 · 74,479#64
@bggcp · 41,794#65
@nr0lll · 78,185#66
@MumilQais1 · 7,844#67
@shabohte · 9,963#68
@myiyia · 190,395#69
@Assro19 · 12,253#70
@ANNI1l · 27,902#71
@smr120h · 101,952#72
@iraqed4 · 3,206,698#73
@NNNN0I · 11,208#74
@ooaooos · 234,525#75
@MemesRaqen · 26,142#76
@iraqedu · 4,750,369#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tazkeraet · 19,593
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 28 September 2026
@P_E_68 · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 September 2026
@lBIBPl · 34,057
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
@asxtye · 51,066
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@IIU4F · 71,059
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@lRlTI · 76,434
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@Diilen · 116,572
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@afQ55 · 124,179
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@ssswvs · 18,618
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 3 October 2026
@cxarc · 23,081
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 16 September 2026
@sxserc · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
@rsr2z · 44,403
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,168
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
@spwnrz · 61,085
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 61,405
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
@HiEiND · 70,060
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@IIU4T · 73,117
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@SlSl2l · 124,898
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 102,919
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@ERT8l · 128,841
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,252
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@FY_XG · 106,204
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@vv1996 · 224,190
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@AY_MN1 · 41,444
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 177 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شمسِين .” (@vc6Il), 140,396 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vc6Il.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.