١٢ كلمة أهم من كلمة "أحبج" ♥🦋.

Channel
. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,434subscribers
+2,185 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001660775631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lRlTI |
| Description | كَالشَمسِ إِنّ بَرَقَت مَجاسِدُها تَحكِي لَنَا اليَاقُوْتَ وَالذَهَبا . - لطَلب التمويل : @RlN6_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lRlTI |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:44 | 76,434 | +121 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 76,313 | -47 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 76,360 | +17 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:40 | 76,343 | +41 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:15 | 76,302 | +49 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:41 | 76,253 | +52 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 76,201 | +22 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:36 | 76,179 | +61 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 76,118 | +42 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:19 | 76,076 | +147 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 75,929 | +38 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 75,891 | +129 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 75,762 | +44 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 75,718 | +73 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 75,645 | +85 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:54 | 75,560 | +68 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 75,492 | +54 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 75,438 | +105 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 75,333 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 75,330 | first reading |
Engagement
393 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.96%
- avg views ÷ 76,434 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,560
- 120 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 120
- of 393 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 120 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 393 (25 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 547,031 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,320
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 393 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lRlTI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 393 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 120 posts held from the last 30 days (3.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
شلون تحرگين دمه؟ 🫴🏻
دخليييي واكسبي حبيبـچ شمنتظرة يحظي ححذفهاا💗😁
صَور ورد كانها الج 💐
ليلة باردة وسَماء مُثقلة بالذكريات هَكذا يختم نُوفَمبَر قصته .
إني أُحِبُّكِ قاصدًا مُتعمّدًا سلّمتُ قلبًا هامَ في عينيكِ عمري فداكِ خُذيهِ لا تتردّدي أنتِ الحياةُ وحلوُها بيديكِ إن شئتِ ظُلمًا فاظلميني إنني لكِ مِنكِ فيكِ فلا ملامَ عليكِ أو شئت عدلًا فاعدلي يا مُنيتي إن الهوى في الحالتينِ إليكِ.
Photo, posted without a caption
غـزل لحبيبچ ✨✨.
شيگول جبار رشيد !!
شگد عـار لعد ➡️.
وينهـم محبين الشعر الشعبي هالقناة الكم ♥️!!
لـ محبين اشعار جبار رشيد 🤎✨..
Showing the 12 most recent of 393 posts we hold for @lRlTI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @lRlTI as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HH_lEl · 44,4767 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,5935 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,2525 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,6984 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,2354 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,9904 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 55,9421 postتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,7441 postحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,5971 postنَـبأ ڪـَراࢪ🦌🍁.
@nabakarar · 1191 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HH_lEl · 44,4762 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,2352 postsقـمــري🪐⇣˓
@O_1os · 3,9272 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,4942 postsريبوست
@iibost · 65,0302 postsᴏᴄʜᴏ
@och8o · 7172 postsاَراكَ مَلجَئي.
@E333ll · 2971 post-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,6981 postعُ
@OAFL2 · 6,0981 postحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,5971 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DRT86 · 41,90945 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,59337 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,25235 posts-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 128,69832 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,99030 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,82630 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 55,94229 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,59727 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,23521 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,05518 postsاستراحة
@estraha_0 · 17,34014 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,7445 postsاقتباسات، حالات واتساب، خلفيات،عبارت حب،
@STORS5 · 277,6605 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,4945 postsحَزن اهلنا .
@esecs · 64,4564 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,0594 postsدَيرة هَلي .
@Mzajyati · 31,1664 postsالامام المهدي"عج"ستوريات حسينيه
@huditi2017 · 167,9133 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 27,8512 postsغمچ گلبي
@lllxcrn · 45,4282 postsمَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 116,8411 postقناة فسنجون
@fasngon · 3,367,5101 postثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 39,5761 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ERT8l · 128,69819 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,74412 postsحيث أنا
@hayaa_0 · 74,59712 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,90910 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 55,9428 postsعَالم زُمردة 𐙚.
@iii_s1r · 35,8748 posts🦢
@laivl · 37,2078 postsقـمــري🪐⇣˓
@O_1os · 3,9278 postsحَزن روُحي .
@MSiMiM · 30,5937 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 21,2406 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,2356 postsرُبما نَلتقي .
@DII_lID · 35,0475 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,0595 postsمتجر ام البنين 🤍
@jlnvooo · 6,4885 postsحِچايات أهَلنة .
@MOOQQ55 · 78,3835 postsفوضىٰ مشاعِر
@V_UUll · 31,4945 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 27,8514 postsمَعلِش .
@DlI_lD · 55,6484 postsريبوست
@iibost · 65,0304 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,8263 postsقصائد حسينيه
@fflx1 · 54,6313 postsجاا وكلبي .
@nscsz · 82,6133 posts☀️
@Ohmaiam · 14,0253 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,0553 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lRlTI named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 October 2026 – 12 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vc6Il · 140,852#1
@IIU4T · 73,117#2
@cf67z · 85,826#3
@ERT8l · 128,698#4
@UIOIU0 · 102,836#5
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,168#6
@Geoooom · 68,145#7
@M1140 · 106,763#8
@afQ55 · 123,978#9
@HiEiND · 69,949#10
@Kd_kla1 · 43,744#11
@asxtye · 50,992#12
@cckkxs · 15,529#13
@Diilen · 116,841#14
@cf67c · 44,990#15
@SlSl2l · 125,407#16
@Narla2 · 71,235#17
@Nh_NE · 83,252#18
@myiyia · 190,314#19
@Majaraat · 58,096#20
@rsr2z · 44,355#21
@HH_H7S · 263,239#22
@citystop2 · 25,686#23
@spwnrz · 60,957#24
@AE_Hl · 109,648#25
@sxserc · 27,282#26
@FCB_V · 89,687#27
@m3im3ii · 114,721#28
@huda_gallery · 50,658#29
@teel_iu · 5,891#30
@nrrd3 · 61,405#31
@T_16_7 · 47,616#32
@MOOQQ55 · 78,383#33
@Yllh7 · 16,668#34
@OOIIIEEE · 56,055#35
@hayaa_0 · 74,597#36
@yatmanqalbi · 101,463#37
@smr120h · 101,852#38
@IIUYL · 16,544#39
@n_a2u · 13,025#40
@nr0lll · 78,093#41
@bggcp · 41,908#42
@Lne_8 · 135,987#43
@ff2tm · 45,441#44
@lBIBPl · 34,035#45
@DEPTH02 · 32,963#46
@ssswvs · 18,607#47
@Firat25 · 12,856#48
@lAlMosahfl · 781,717#49
@zzzzzz · 1,994,905#50
@PPPJP · 3,190,925#51
@llllTBi · 10,398#52
@IIU4F · 71,059#53
@lIIM6 · 29,234#54
@t88q1 · 38,934#55
@DRT86 · 41,909#56
@bbosha16 · 5,714#57
@sdqgii · 29,722#58
@K27R99 · 32,614#59
@nrrd1 · 37,244#60
@Qiise · 21,511#61
@ahmed_aldahlaky · 7,202#62
@povv4 · 128,607#63
@NO_6C · 31,777#64
@PPPPJ · 2,314,808#65
@zt_tz2 · 28,795#66
@ksa_gigi · 14,047#67
@ANNI1l · 27,869#68
@yypyy · 892,095#69
@kooora_land · 2#70
@II8II5 · 8,188#71
@ooaooos · 234,671#72
@NNNN0I · 11,208#73
@nscsz · 82,613#74
@ZZ_VVi · 14,082#75
@iraqed4 · 3,201,482#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ssswvs · 18,607
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 3 October 2026
@Majaraat · 58,096
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@IIU4T · 73,117
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@Nh_NE · 83,252
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 102,836
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@myiyia · 190,314
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@Tazkeraet · 19,576
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 28 September 2026
@RRR9_0 · 42,481
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@IIU4F · 71,059
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@m3im3ii · 114,721
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@sxserc · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
@HiEiND · 69,949
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@afQ55 · 123,978
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@lBIBPl · 34,035
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
@trrteb · 63,570
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
@Geoooom · 68,145
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 6
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@AE_Hl · 109,648
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@UIOIU0U · 178,107
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@fsbdys · 25,743
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 11 September 2026
@P_E_68 · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 September 2026
@SSEN2 · 46,816
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@ecnoc · 61,205
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@nrrd3 · 61,405
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 166 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ” (@lRlTI), 76,434 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lRlTI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.