الخيل الأبيض لا يليق بي فسواد عينيّ القاتلتين لا يليق به إلا خيلٌ أسود ولا أعلم متى سيأتي خيلي ومتى سأمتطيه وأمضي به إلى مدينتك المدينة التي لطالما أحببتها والتي تركت فيها من ذكرياتي ما يكفي لأن تجعلني أشتاق إليها كلما مرّ اسمها في بالي ربما سيأتي يوم وأعود إليها لا أعلم متى ولا كيف… لكنني أعلم أنني سأعود بخيلي الأسود وأمرّ من شوارعها التي حفظت خطاي وأتوقف قليلًا عند الأماكن التي تركت فيها أجمل أيامي

Channel
كليشات ذكاء اصطناعي للبنات
@mtd7knish
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
234,276subscribers
-1,722 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001461744234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mtd7knish |
| Created | 30 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mtd7knish |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 234,276 | -170 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 234,446 | -159 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 234,605 | -946 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 235,551 | -157 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 235,708 | -193 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 235,901 | -97 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 235,998 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.393%
- avg views ÷ 234,276 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 922
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (28 January 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,686 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ask me to show you poetry in motion and I will show you a horse
هواي راسلتوني ع قناة البنية الصيدلانية الي تنطي نصايح للبشرة وهياتها 💘🎀 https://t.me/+QzkmuB2dexkzNGUy
كروبي للاغاني والسوالف اني وصديقاتي تعالن يمنه سوا نسولف ونسمع 😋😋😋 https://t.me/+BdoGKEIY3bQ1MWQy
اريدك تنشاء لي صوررررررااا واقعيههههه هواييي لاتغير ملامحي حافظ على وجهي الحقيقي كما هو الحال حافظ على ملامح الوجوه أو ملامح وجهي . اريد صورااا واقعية اكسر اضاءه ذكاء اصطناعي اريده واقعية فضيععع حافظ على واقعية صورا. وصف واقعي جدًا للصورة كما لو أنها ملتقطة بهاتف ذكي: صورة سيلفي عمودية واقعية لفتاة شابة داخل غرفة بإضاءة داخلية ناعمة. الفتاة تميل رأسها قليلًا إلى الجانب مع ابتسامة خفيفة وهادئة، بينما تضع طرف إصبع السب…
Photo, posted without a caption
قم ب انشاء صوره لهذه الفتاه 1. زاوية الرأس والحركات (الوضعية) زاوية الرأس: الرأس مائل بشكل ملحوظ وجانبي، حيث تبدو اللقطة مقلوبة أو مائلة بزاوية قريبة من 90 درجة (وضعية أفقية أو شبه مقلوبة). حركة اليد: ترفع الشخصية يدها أمام وجهها مباشرة مع تفريق الأصابع (وضعية "كف" أو إشارة للتوقف/التغطية)، مما يغطي جزءاً من الأنف والفم ويترك العينين واضحتين. نظرة العينين: النظرة موجهة مباشرة نحو عدسة الكاميرا بشكل حاد ومباشر. 2. الم…
💓
انشاء لي صورة لهاذين الشابين اجعل الفتاة تحمل الهاتف ايفون 12برو ماكس لونه اسود مع الحفاظ على ملامح وجهه 100 اجعل الفتاة تضع اصبعها في فمهاا واجعل تسريحة شعرهاا كبه مرفوعه فوق ترتدي كلبيه عراقيه مع سوار النسجار بيدهاا لونه اصفر وغرتها طويله لون الكلبيه بني مرصعه وجميله واجعب الشاب يقف خلفها اجعل الشاب اطول منها اجعل يده على شعره ويده الثانيه بجيبه اجعله يردتي تيشيرت اخضر مع برموده لون بني فاتح واجعل بشرته اكثر حبيبية…
Photo, posted without a caption
انشئ صورة {عمودية بزاوية 9:16} الصورة عبارة عن سيلفي داخل غرفة بإضاءة خافتة، تبدو ملتقطة بكاميرا هاتف في بيئة مظلمة نسبياً، لذلك جودة الصورة منخفضة قليلاً مع وجود نعومة في التفاصيل وقليل من الضبابية الرقمية. الضوء الرئيسي في الصورة ضوء أبيض خافت قادم من مصدر قريب، ينعكس مباشرة على الوجوه فيجعل البشرة أفتح بينما تبقى الخلفية غارقة في الظلال الداكنة. زاوية التصوير والمسافة: التصوير قريب جداً (Close-up سيلفي)، مرفوعة ق…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mtd7knish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 460,658 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@se_pm · 31,811#1
@FCB_V · 96,793#2
@H1HOD · 40,932#3
@uz_cz · 7,602#4
@Diilen · 114,682#5
@lAlMosahfl · 770,523#6
@cf67c · 44,136#7
@a_lia42 · 2,645#8
@asxtye · 55,309#9
@zahre2000 · 290,270#10
@elfno · 16,333#11
@SlSl2l · 118,315#12
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382#13
@PPPJP · 3,255,955#14
@vc6Il · 132,607#15
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 51,187#16
@OOIIIEEE · 56,291#17
@cf67z · 89,016#18
@tv_wlil · 10,909#19
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428#20
@ma_L7ii · 18,902#21
@Fi_51 · 16,711#22
@rsr2z · 46,093#23
@povv4 · 125,545#24
@MOOQQ55 · 76,858#25
@spwnrz · 59,903#26
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781#27
@s54ou · 43,479#28
@a_espresso · 8,539#29
@llSPR · 18,914#30
@XG_64 · 89,963#31
@smr120h · 107,954#32
@deved_iraq · 122,184#33
@IIU4T · 77,343#34
@lRlTI · 74,398#35
@alhyunemia · 148,107#36
@ERT8l · 130,301#37
@nr0lll · 84,465#38
@RIlAKSI3 · 11,114#39
@shabohte · 10,194#40
@sdqgii · 31,891#41
@iT64i · 80,548#42
@noona_88 · 9,056#43
@M1140 · 101,068#44
@UIOIU0 · 107,908#45
@eooee1 · 27,045#46
@ll_1225 · 1,280#47
@hayaa_0 · 73,046#48
@Y_memz · 3,246#49
@Kranj9 · 5,353#50
@YYYYD · 1,713,531#51
@afQ55 · 126,576#52
@U_1_20 · 1,361#53
@lI9ll9lll · 5,117#54
@HeB1H1 · 102,665#55
@szovl · 12,251 (as read 11 August 2026)#56
@uuuuxcc · 207,147#57
@sxserc · 28,030#58
@lBIBPl · 34,677#59
@LLU63 · 22,267#60
@ff2tm · 48,051#61
@ahmdssh · 1,697#62
@c8orl · 45,849#63
@nnKnn · 1,334,512#64
@FCB_35 · 1,151#65
@Pale313 · 29,709#66
@iraqed4 · 3,476,934#67
@iraqedu · 4,512,143#68
@iiPiii · 52,622#69
@errzzl · 546,391#70
@one_news2026 · 99,699#71
@Edu211 · 652,395#72
@MemesRaqen · 28,393#73
@rtte8 · 2,244#74
@llquraanll · 247,251#75
@HH_H7S · 279,320#76
@santer_sads · 361,840#77
@v999v · 1,585,400#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alhyunemia · 148,107
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@zahre2000 · 290,270
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@SACHERTI · 166,170
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@iraq11e · 324,342
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@tttktt · 172,381
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@E_EEN · 286,595
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@zz_zwz · 394,808
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@un_37 · 395,873
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@PVTNFS · 625,020
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@ASEEM6 · 281,969
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@zv_vb · 268,656
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzzxx8 · 344,670
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@vv1996 · 235,239
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@TTTpT · 267,031
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@admant1 · 417,850
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzzxx · 434,208
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@J777E · 274,896
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@gsvsvw · 285,572
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@szszs2 · 153,570
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@ececeo · 198,793
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@N_N71 · 412,284
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@English_Hanan1 · 208,763
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@O6_40 · 333,410
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@UIOIU0U · 189,115
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كليشات ذكاء اصطناعي للبنات” (@mtd7knish), 234,276 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtd7knish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.