Channel
@abadzhievaofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002424404993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abadzhievaofficial |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abadzhievaofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 53 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 52 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 53 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 51 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 51 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 50 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 42.6% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 22.2% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5438470358233526968 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера была на личном приеме у заместителя председателя правительства Коми, задала важнейший вопрос по поводу строительства регионального (государственного) приюта в Инте. В подробностях описала всю ситуацию в городе, сказала, почему нужно строить именно гос.приют: система ОСВВ не позволяет полностью решить проблему, нужен именно приют. «Регулирование численности животных без владельцев по модели ОСВВ не приводит к ж…
❤3👏2👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Стали известны подробности проверки, проводившейся в отношении ЦРБ Инты❕ Сегодня была в прокуратуре, изучила почти 80 листов надзорного производства… Как я писала в предыдущих постах, в отношении ЦРБ Инты 02.07.26 проводилась проверка по доводам моих обращений, в ходе которой были выявлены нарушения: -отсутствие в ГБУЗ РК «Интинская ЦРБ» Наркологического отделения -отсутствие в ГБУЗ РК «Интинская ЦРБ» (на Мира 10…
❤2👏2custom 54384703582335269681
Если бы выборы в Госдуму состоялись завтра, за кого бы вы проголосовали?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4❤2👏2
🍎 ДЕРЖИМ В КУРСЕ! ➰Сегодня зарегистрировали первый список кандидатов на выборы в Заксобрание — в Карелии. ➰На этой неделе были заверены списки кандидатов «Яблока» в региональные парламенты Санкт-Петербурга и Новгородской области. ➰Поданы документы на выборы в Заксобрания в Калининграде и в Пскове. ➰16 июля Федеральное Бюро «Яблока» выдвинуло еще 4 кандидатов на выборы в Госдуму по одномандатным округам в Московск…
❤3👏2
Прекрасная агитация ЦИКа за кандидата от Яблока.
👍3❤1👏1
Согласна на 100%!
💯1
До выборов: 2 месяца Минюст: вносит в список иноагентов Надеждина 🤦♀️ В Кремле продолжается кампания панического блокирования реальных кандидатов ради сохранения власти. Никому нельзя, только одобренным, остальным не ломиться. Яблоко идет на выборы с программой из 43-х слов, чтобы у людей была возможность легально выразить свою позицию за мир и свободу. Не упустите эту возможность в сентябре (если наш список зар…
❤3💯3
❗️ЦИК России на заседании 10 июля заверил федеральный список кандидатов партии «Яблоко» на выборах депутатов Государственной Думы, а также список кандидатов по одномандатным избирательным округам. Из федерального списка «Яблока» был исключен только один кандидат. Отметим, что из списка ЛДПР были исключены четыре кандидата, у КПРФ — три, у «Единой России» и «Новых людей» — по одному. Кроме того, ЦИК зарегистрировал …
❤2🎉2custom 54384703582335269681
Когда находишься в лучшем городе (дома), жизнь перестает быть прежней, потому что энергия здесь наполняет больше, чем в любом другом месте. Поэтому здесь такие прекрасные люди, как нигде больше, и поэтому сюда хочется возвращаться снова и снова. Не город, мечта.
💯3❤2
Оптимизация Интинской ЦРБ: кое-кто получает по заслугам! 🔨 В прошлом посте я подробно расписывала про все ответы органов, в которые я отправляла обращения по поводу оптимизации больницы. На днях мне пришел ответ от Прокуратуры Инты о том, что Территориальный орган Росздравнадзора по Коми провел в отношении Интинской ЦРБ контрольное (надзорное) мероприятие, в ходе которого были выявлены нарушения: - отсутствие в ГБ…
❤3👏3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @abadzhievaofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы выборы в Госдуму состоялись завтра, за кого бы вы проголосовали?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Виктория Абаджиева” (@abadzhievaofficial), 53 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abadzhievaofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.