Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Яблочные зашквары: рыбакизм-явлинизм🍎

Channel

Яблочные зашквары: рыбакизм-явлинизм🍎

@YablochnyeZashkvary134

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778444442
TypeChannel
Username@YablochnyeZashkvary134
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/YablochnyeZashkvary134

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1912031977 August 2026 — 191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 191 subscribers15 August 2026 — 193 subscribers22 August 2026 — 197 subscribers28 August 2026 — 200 subscribers4 September 2026 — 201 subscribers25 September 2026 — 203 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 49 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:36203+2
4 Sept 2026, 11:01201+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:25200+3
22 Aug 2026, 06:13197+4
15 Aug 2026, 00:14193+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:15191no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:43191first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3232.0%
🔥2424.0%
🥰1414.0%
🤮88.00%
💩66.00%
❤55.00%
🤡44.00%
🤔33.00%
👍22.00%
🥴22.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

куда же без зашкваров?

🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rybakovyablokoPhoto

В последние дни «Яблоко» решили публично в соцсетях поддержать те, чья поддержка в нынешних условиях может привести к снятию нашей партии с выборов. Считаем необходимым заявить: партия «Яблоко» категорически не имеет иностранных источников финансирования, не поддерживает никаких отношений с организациями, признанными нежелательными в Российской Федерации и не считает заявления, обращения, мероприятия, проводимые кем…

🤡3💩1🤮1

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gr_yavlinsky

​​«Мы идем на выборы с категорическим требованием прекращения гибели людей, сохранения их жизни — скорейшего заключения соглашения о прекращении огня. Именно в этом главный смысл нашей предвыборной программы. В ней всего 43 слова. Эти выборы не о налогах, тарифах, зарплатах или пенсиях. Они о жизни человека, о свободе и о будущем России. Фактически это будет референдум, в котором, возможно, примут участие более 60 м…

6 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTCviews —

Яблочные зашквары: рыбакизм-явлинизм🍎 pinned «Будет ли руководство Яблока искусственно понижать рейтинг,чтобы не злить АП?»

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Будет ли руководство Яблока искусственно понижать рейтинг,чтобы не злить АП?

  1. Да, но обойдутся стандартным сливом полевой кампании и наблюдения46%
  2. Нет, они настоящие бойцы и герои!!!46%
  3. Да, опять призовут не голосовать за себя22%
  4. Да, объявят о выдвижении Явлинского в президенты в 2030 году5%
  5. Да, поддержат СВО(У)7%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC80 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неплохой мем, кстати

🔥9🥰5😁3💩1

5 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По следам ранее выявленного: активнее всех в дискредитации Яблока участвуют вовсе не НЛ и не Журавлев. Однажды кандидат по одномандатному округу 166 написал пост, собравший более 1,200 комментариев. Среди них было много недружественных. В дальнейшем обсуждение было удалено и не хотелось бы думать, что это было по звонку из руководящих органов. В этой полемике, помимо прочего, кандидатка по округу 119 советует автор…

🔥2😁2

5 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC73 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну вот! Вы жаловались, и девушка оделась

🔥3💩2😁2❤1🤔1🤮1

5 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @this_is_goncharovVideo

Друзья… Ради этого видео пришлось вспоминать мемы, а в моём возрасте это не так просто.

🔥2😁1

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Имитация кампании в самом разгаре!

😁5

5 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elitnyememyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4😁2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @YablochnyeZashkvary134. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Будет ли руководство Яблока искусственно понижать рейтинг,чтобы не злить АП?

  1. Да, но обойдутся стандартным сливом полевой кампании и наблюдения46%
  2. Нет, они настоящие бойцы и герои!!!46%
  3. Да, опять призовут не голосовать за себя22%
  4. Да, объявят о выдвижении Явлинского в президенты в 2030 году5%
  5. Да, поддержат СВО(У)7%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пресс-служба Яблока
@yabloko_press · 47,619
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Николай Рыбаков
@rybakovyabloko · 43,388
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 September 2026
ПАРТИЯ ЯБЛОКО
@yabloko_party · 270,201
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яблочные зашквары: рыбакизм-явлинизм🍎” (@YablochnyeZashkvary134), 203 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YablochnyeZashkvary134.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.