Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

жукальфа 🥰🦋

@jukalpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

531subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595454930
TypeChannel
Username@jukalpha
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jukalpha

Growth

5317 Aug 2026, 05:46 — 531 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:38 — 531 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:467 Aug 2026, 18:38
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 530–532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:38531no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:46531first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1973.1%
👍415.4%
13.85%
🖕13.85%
😭13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC≈2,000 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Альфабанк подшарили за предикт маркеты и подсаживают нормисов на лудку, забавно

👍2

Signed hjk

3 Mar 2026, 09:23 UTC505 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

судьба прям не хочет чтобы я в ваши криптовалюты возвращался, сука да что за анлак нахуй. 7 поинтов не хватило для халявки https://www.xoob.link/nft-mint

Signed hjk

18 Feb 2026, 18:45 UTC343 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shitbildersPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed hjk

17 Feb 2026, 17:38 UTC356 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁2😭1

Signed hjk

10 Feb 2026, 05:19 UTC363 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А этот паттерн как называется? Кто знает? 😁 Помню на листинге самые быстрые по 6 продавали, у кого лагало по 5.5 +-

Signed hjk

10 Feb 2026, 05:13 UTC295 viewsread 7 August 2026

кстати по итогу просто биднул на 700к+ чтобы хоть что-то прочувствовать с дропа, потому что на фарм я благополучно забил хуй после первых двух сезонов. в выходе токена я бык, хотя по рынку в целом я бы сказал наоборот. и после новости о планах привлечь доп инвест кэфы просели, поэтому вэлью ставки уже +25% кароче как говорится "будем посмотрим что будет дальше", есть еще такой вайбик докинуть копейку на лярд, кэфчик

Signed hjk

9 Feb 2026, 17:47 UTC171 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @web3memoriess

Конкурс, который точно изменит жизнь победителя. ( в честь 5000 подписчиков ) Мы разыграем НЕ ДЕНЬГИ, а нечто большее Да и если будем разыгрывать существенную сумму $$$, никто не поверит, что ее можно забрать (и убьют канал ботами). А вот доступ в самую сильную альфу - реален. Если вы не понимаете, почему альфа > $$$, читайте это. Билет в мир, где спекулянты не обнуляются, а зарабатывают и шейрят аналитику 24/7. Ми

Signed hjk

3 Feb 2026, 18:41 UTC383 viewsread 7 August 2026

воу, солана флиппер. въебал все бабки в интернете, люблю красный дошик. я больше никогда не смогу быть счастливым, богатым и счастливым, богатым и счастливым.

Signed hjk

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jukalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 652,958 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“жукальфа 🥰🦋” (@jukalpha), 531 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jukalpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.