Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

by lexaman.eth

@allChainDAO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,799subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001642982500
TypeChannel
Username@allChainDAO
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/allChainDAO

Growth

7,7997,8127,805.56 August 2026 — 7,812 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,812 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,809 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,804 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,799 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,797–7,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:347,799-5
9 Aug 2026, 10:067,804-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:277,809-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:207,812no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:197,812first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,413 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁74552.7%
👍20714.6%
🔥19814.0%
1268.92%
👏463.26%
🤔251.77%
🤯241.70%
🍌221.56%
110.778%
👌80.566%
🤩10.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,413reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 18:59 UTC≈2,450 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cp0xdotcom

Pepperoni Show #🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕 Каждый день мы бьемся в нашем челендже по чемпионату мира на Preddy. Каждый день смотрим матчи и параллельно кушаем пиццу. И раз к нам в гости зашел lexaman (создатель канала @allChainDao), пришла пора заказать Пепперони. Отвлечься от парадокса, что 11 турков не могут что-то куда-то затолкнуть, комментариев в фейк-инстаграммах о том что может и не может мужчина в свои 4

👍20🔥85

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

12 Mar 2026, 22:50 UTC≈5,050 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptogoodreads

how crypto guys explain their job: > to parents: “i work in tech” > to friends: “i do finance stuff” > to girl: “i’m an investor” > to CT: “i’m a degen” > to mirror at 3am: “what am I doing with my life”

😁14321👍15🔥3

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

8 Mar 2026, 22:17 UTC≈7,260 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

я конечно со многим сталкивался за 4 года в криптовалюте, но чтобы словить бан через три секунды после того как открыл страницу с нефтью - это очень сильно пс я благо вывел оттуда все неделю назад, так что пусть засунут себе в очко спертую сотку

😁98🍌7

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

30 Dec 2025, 19:24 UTC≈9,980 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Накидали с ребятами новогодние поздравления https://teletype.in/@uncommonuser/cryptoalmanac2025 Я в конце пару слов от себя написал, обязательно читайте про итоги всех участников и подписывайтесь на их каналы Всех с наступающим!

🔥23😁15🍌31

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

26 Dec 2025, 17:58 UTC≈13,400 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

сейчас как зашорчу лайтер и стану самым богатым

😁99🤯14🔥8🤔1

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

26 Dec 2025, 16:59 UTC≈7,400 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

я своей жизни никогда не видел более тупоголовых людей чем разработчики апи полимаркета. Они просто отобрали самых элитных индусов, самый цвет нации ну что это ваще такое? как проект с вал 15ккк может такое отдавать. Я молчу про то что для определения статуса маркета нужно перебрать 40 комбинаций 5 полей. 40!!!!!!!! это вообше как возможно. Вместо адекватных 2-3 полей

😁69👍1🔥1

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

24 Dec 2025, 18:32 UTC≈5,000 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @web3memoriessPhoto

Больше 5 миллиардов вынесли «профессионалы» из Solana-казино. Подводим итоги мем-сезона. Считаем чужие деньги. 1. Лаунчпады = $1B Безусловный лидер - Pump.Fun - $900M fee в солане, которую они безжалостно стаканили ( правда с недавних пор им приходится тратить 100% revenue на байбеки $PUMP ) Остальные лаунчпады, вроде letsBONK.fun, Bags и др. вместе вымыли около $100M 2. Ликвидити пулы = $350M Raydium вместе с Met

👍347😁7🔥3

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

19 Dec 2025, 17:13 UTC≈5,810 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

риск фри идейка короче, ща проходит сейл генсун казалось бы очередной кешграбный сейл проекта который успеет заскамиться еще до премаркета вот коротко условия сейла: аукцион на котором вы кидаете желаемую сумму заноса и капу по которой хотите купить. Минимальная фдв заноса 1кк Максимальная 1ккк. Чтобы выкупили всю аллоку по макс цене нужно 30кк. при этом, в условиях сейла прямо указано что последний раунд (серия

23👍13🤔6🔥1🤩1🤯1

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

18 Dec 2025, 00:30 UTC≈4,830 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

не ну достойно я считаю

👏36👍18🔥5🤯1

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

15 Dec 2025, 16:46 UTC≈5,120 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @web3memoriessPhoto

Solana Breakpoint 2025 ИТОГИ: - у Алона ( PumpFun ) больше охраны, чем у всех из Solana Foundation вместе взятых ( 12 против 4 ). - Jupiter анонсировали 7 новых продуктов ( в том числе свой стейбл ), поглощение Rain.fi ( чтобы построить лендинг ), организовали тьму сайд ивентов и были главным центром внимания этой конфы. Оплачивали, видимо, в нативном токене, $JUP -20%. - Coinbase интегрирует SOL DEX напрямую в бирж

😁33🤔9🤯74👍1

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

11 Dec 2025, 10:41 UTC≈5,180 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

че есть кто на брейкпоинте?

😁16

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

28 Nov 2025, 21:15 UTC≈7,190 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

0xf76B17Ce8ff08f96aD7bb785d4ed898d5d5014eF ну признавайтесь кто это был?

😁30

Signed lexaman.eth | Phoenix

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allChainDAO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,030 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“by lexaman.eth” (@allChainDAO), 7,799 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allChainDAO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.