Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nasobin REPORT (Хроники Грядущего)

@Nasobin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,904subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394625470
TypeChannel
Username@Nasobin
DescriptionКанал «Сбитый Летчик» (Хроники грядущего) был захвачен хакерами. Я, Олег Насобин, создал новый канал, лучше прежнего. Для личной связи: Nasobin.org
Created12 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nasobin

Growth

12,90212,91712,909.56 August 2026 — 12,917 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,912 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,910 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,906 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,902 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,904 subscribers12,9046 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,900–12,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:2612,904+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:1712,902-3
10 Aug 2026, 00:4112,905-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:1112,906-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:4012,910-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:1312,912-5
6 Aug 2026, 08:1712,917first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 12,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,200
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held55 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total231,190
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,310
Videos
585
Links
2,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ретрит сегодня. Людей в радиусе 10 километров нет

12 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 12 August 2026

У разных моделей ИИ разный личный характер. Это уже четко видно. Самый мерзкий у Клода (Антропик).

11 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 12 August 2026

Европейские энергосети спланированы так, что подключение к ним большого количества добывающих солнечными панелями электростанций невозможно. Проекты на производство энергии стоят в очереди - нет возможности подключиться. При этом во Франции ситуация еще сложнее - солнечную энергию выкупать невыгодно - потому что атомная энергия гораздо дешевле. Так что развитие солнечных панелей из под тишка всегда тормозилось. Но

11 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC≈3,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

Почитываю “Медузу”. Интересно мне, чем они отличают себя от кремлевских журналистов-комсомольцев? Ничем. И те и другие мыслят одинаково. Срочно новость в ленту - сын олигарха разбил ламборгини. Все вокруг бабла и самых базовых рефлексов. “формат” всегда один. Пишут девочки - пусечки, маменькины мальчики и перверты-редакторы. Только по случайности одни оказались в комсомольцах а другие в оппах.

11 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

Вижу дискуссию о правилах русского языка “в/на Украине.” В языке всегда есть маркеры свой/чужой. Разные социальные группы говорят по разному. У моряков, ментов и летчиков свой язык. Так они отличают себя от остальных. Говорить “в Украине” означает признавать за воюющей Украиной и Украинцами право на самоопределение, а также государственность. Это не правило языка, а маркер социальной группы, скорее.

11 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,750 viewsread 12 August 2026

Президент США теперь прячется в мусоровозах от моджахедов. Востребован коуч по темам: “Как избежать конфронтации с любовником жены”, “Как обхитрить судебного пристава”. “Где достать объедки премиум+” https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/c1j177n9p93o

11 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈3,750 viewsread 12 August 2026

Насколько я понимаю, (мои субъективные оценки): Изя и Шмуля, овладев США, видели будущее примерно так: “На фоне ущемления свободы всюду на Планете, дадим нороту денежную волю в США. И по крипте, и по баблосу, и по фиату. Привлечем все ресурсы мира в наши новые “проекты” (ИИ, энергетика, Космос) и так укрепимся в своей роли Главного Пацана на раене.” Поэтому США отказались от CBDC. Поэтому CLARITY ACT был актуален.

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,730 viewsread 12 August 2026

Итак, общие развед-признаки (видимые) 1. В ЕС анонсирован CBDC, но детали держатся в секрете 2. В США “бегом” принимали CLARITY ACT но не успели и резко его тормознули 3. В Японии (главный источник дешевого “кэша”) большие перемены 4. ЕС меняет дизайн денег. В спешке 5. Пока в США действует SEC и CTFC - в любой момент может сработать рубильник - отсечь всю крипту от фиата, например. 6. Граждане (резиденты) РФ покупа

11 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 12 August 2026

Интересна эта тема или нет? Никто не сводит воедино и не анализирует развед-признаки разорения “хомяков”.

11 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,660 viewsread 12 August 2026

В США на удивление так и не приняли CLARITY ACT, на который была надежда как у криптанов, так и у блокчейн консультантов каковые помогают “хомяуам” выводить и парковать наскирдованное. Рынок настроен пессимистично. Ставки Polymarket на подписание Акта в 2026-м упали с более чем 80% в феврале до рекордно низких ~24% в середине июля, ненадолго отскочили и к началу августа просели до 13–15%. Сенатор Ламмис предупреждал

11 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈4,080 viewsread 12 August 2026

У многих украинских и российских хомяков, скирдовавших наличные евро деньги в гаражах, на хуторах у родственников любовниц и пр. осталось очень мало времени. Новый дизайн Евро утвержден и печать новых купюр готовится в спешке тоже не случайно. На практике, даже без громких заявлений, “старые наличные Евро” будет невозможно отоварить. Особенно это актуально для Украины - потому что если Кремль нацелился на разрушени

11 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈3,550 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @infantmilitario

В результате российского авиаудара по г. Запорожье фактически полностью уничтожен (в ближайшей перспективе восстановление невозможно) металлургический комбинат «Запорожсталь». Разрушены доменные печи и другие важные для функционирования комбината объекты. Погибли восемь и ранены 19 работников. Это очень плохая для Украины новость по двум причинам: 1️⃣Это был последний из работающих на Украине металлургических комби

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Nasobin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 164,115 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nasobin REPORT (Хроники Грядущего)” (@Nasobin), 12,904 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nasobin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.