Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nasobin REPORT (Хроники Грядущего)

Channel

Nasobin REPORT (Хроники Грядущего)

@Nasobin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,876subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394625470
TypeChannel
Username@Nasobin
DescriptionКанал «Сбитый Летчик» (Хроники грядущего) был захвачен хакерами. Я, Олег Насобин, создал новый канал, лучше прежнего. Для личной связи: Nasobin.org
Created12 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nasobin

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,86012,92112,890.56 August 2026 — 12,917 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,912 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,910 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,906 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,902 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,904 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,911 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,921 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,918 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,907 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,901 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,900 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,895 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,906 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,907 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,901 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,904 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,903 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,894 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,893 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,888 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,886 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,884 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,889 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,899 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,905 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,893 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,882 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,877 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,873 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,879 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,874 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,878 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,891 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,894 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,889 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,887 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,880 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,878 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,880 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,872 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,877 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,876 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,874 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,873 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,869 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,865 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,860 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,866 subscribers10 November 2026 — 12,876 subscribers12,8766 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,851–12,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:0512,876+10
9 Nov 2026, 00:5512,866+6
7 Nov 2026, 18:5112,860-5
6 Nov 2026, 18:4612,865-4
5 Nov 2026, 21:2712,869-4
4 Nov 2026, 22:3412,873-1
2 Nov 2026, 20:4712,874-2
1 Nov 2026, 20:4212,876-1
31 Oct 2026, 22:1012,877+5
30 Oct 2026, 22:0412,872-8
27 Oct 2026, 16:5612,880+2
26 Oct 2026, 18:2712,878-2
25 Oct 2026, 21:2712,880-7
23 Oct 2026, 21:1012,887-2
22 Oct 2026, 22:0912,889-5
21 Oct 2026, 17:0912,894+3
19 Oct 2026, 16:1612,891+13
18 Oct 2026, 15:0912,878+4
17 Oct 2026, 16:5912,874-5
16 Oct 2026, 15:0512,879first reading

Engagement

246 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 12,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,300
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
62
of 246 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held246 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total266,520
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,330
Videos
≈589
Links
≈2,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (43.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 10 November 2026

Когда меня хотят задеть или оскорбить, мне говорят, что я “с Уралмаша”. А я не понимаю, неужели это что-то нехорошее? Скажите прямо - в чем тут дело? “Уралмаш” имеет негативную коннотацию что ли?

10 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 10 November 2026

Иран постит картинки как бомбит авианосцы и базы. Врет опять? Подтверждения не нахожу

9 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC≈3,940 viewsread 10 November 2026

Сейчас мы живем в мире негодяев. Хороших людей много, я бы сказал - большинство. Но все они “нефрмат”. Мы уже не знаем примеров “успех хорошего человека”. Не живем, а выживаем. А в СССР был культ именно “хорошего человека”. Выглядело это и наивно, и кондово, и неумелой “агиткой”. Но культ все равно был живым

9 Nov 2026, 22:21 UTC≈3,950 viewsread 10 November 2026

Совок, совок, совок… А образование было лучшим в мире, бесплатным, обязательным и доступным для всех

8 Nov 2026, 23:21 UTC≈7,550 viewsread 10 November 2026

А где “Иллюминаты” то? А всё. Они потерялись. При наличии “горячих войн” ЦРУ уже не рулит. Ватикан изучает опыт Диснейленда чтобы оптимизировать свою EBIDTA, ЕСБ и ФРС не располагают никаким маневром: Кнопки баблометов залипли, и ни остановить их, ни поднажать “Иллюминаты” не могут. Наука вся ушла в Китай. Дергать курс на бирже вверх/вниз это теперь идиотское занятие, которое ни на что, кроме спекуляции фантиками …

8 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC≈4,390 viewsread 10 November 2026

Формирование правительства в Израиле поручено не Биби Нетаньяху (53 мандата в Кнессете) а Айзенкоту (48 мандатов). Еще 19 мандатов у проарабских партий Израиля, которые поддержат Айзенкота, хотя Айзенкот о поддержке их не просит. В таких условиях “снова воевать Иран” - стремно. Рыжего Донни удавят “свои”, потому что проиграны выборы в Конгресс и Сенат. Ворошить дальше муравейник с осами на Ближнем Востоке - это плох…

8 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC≈4,390 viewsread 10 November 2026

Про США: Китаю импичмент Трампа не выгоден. Трамп сейчас увязнет “в борбе с Сенатом и Конгрессом”. Для этого Рыжий подбирает “в команду” “твердых орехов” которые собираются просто отлаиваться, и ни на что другое не способны. Таким образом, если Трампа не импичнуть, его коррумпированный клан доживет до следующих президентских выборов. У Клана нет другого пути - только участвовать в них, потому что если отойти от дел…

8 Nov 2026, 18:12 UTC≈4,260 viewsread 10 November 2026

Поскольку дискуссия продолжается, напишу еще один пост. На этот раз про план Кремля и Пекина на пост-военный период: 1. Исходим, что цели изложенные выше достигнуты: Украина смирилась с потерей территорий, Зеленский после подписания капитуляции бежал, в Украине “нейтральное” (т.е. промосковское) правительство. Тогда: 2. Внутри ЕС большинство политических сил, и особенно “новые политические силы” требуют немедленног…

8 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC≈4,300 viewsread 10 November 2026

Еще: Кремлядь довольна Зеленским и его администрацией. Поэтому за ним нет охоты, и по “штабам” Москва не бъет. Довольна потому, что во-первых, народ Украины сейчас ненавидит свою политическую власть. Москва считает, что Власть У. держится только силой. во-вторых, Зеленский вызывает все больше раздражения на Западе как коррупцией, так и своим неумелым поведением. в-третьих, Администрация Зеленского демонстративно …

8 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,210 viewsread 10 November 2026

Я говорю об этом, поскольку есть смысл объяснить, что происходит. Также говорю о том, что необходимо сделать ради перелома этой стратегии. Тема очень болезненная, и для меня тоже. Поэтому, не имея оснований и уверенности, я бы ее не озвучивал. Но имея уверенность, я готов обосновать каждый из тезисов фактами, а также обосновать связность и логику тезисов.

8 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC≈4,260 viewsread 10 November 2026

Не, я удивляюсь - некоторые друзья думают что пререговоры это вот так что ли: • Отдайте Домбас! • Нэ • А ну ладно.

8 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC≈4,500 viewsread 10 November 2026

С украинской стороны в числе делегатов будет Буданов. Ему уже наверняка передали “формулу мира” от Кремля: а) Украина выполняет требования Москвы, которые ограничиваются базой, позволяющей Кремлю объявить о “победе”, но без сокрушительных новых претензий к Украине (например, отдать Одессу, Харьков и побережье. Такие требования Кремль считает “умеренными” и “дружественными”. б) После этого украинские вожди тихо лин…

Showing the 12 most recent of 246 posts we hold for @Nasobin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Nasobin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @Nasobin as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кыштымский карлик
@karlkanal · 19,438
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Войтенков МЫСЛИ
@voitenkov · 21,315
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
Пробуждающий Мир - официальный канал
@promirru · 28,171
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
Глогер США Майами
@VadimMiami · 48,113
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
Хистори.Эко
@history_eco · 21,629
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
Вадим Шегалов. PLANDEMIA.NEWS
@voyager1970 · 44,673
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Квест Теория Каст и Ролей
@alexkrol · 18,735
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Будильник. Кому не всё равно
@komunevseravno · 39,631
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
МИРОНОВ ДЕ-ФАКТО
@mironov_de_facto · 18,844
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
ЭТОТ ПРЕКРАСНЫЙ И ТАИНСТВЕННЫЙ МИР
@mir_krasoti_i_tain · 26,131
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Охотник на связи
@ohotnik_na_sviazy · 74,161
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
история пи
@istoriapioficial · 19,920
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Перехват управления
@logikadysha · 36,927
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
[Conspiranews]
@conspiranewschannel · 77,453
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Коваленко. НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК- СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЕ
@n_w_order · 111,452
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона
@danielsatchkov · 35,705
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Председатель СНТ
@predsedatelprav · 43,869
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nasobin REPORT (Хроники Грядущего)” (@Nasobin), 12,876 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nasobin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.