Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lazarchuk_ru- Лазарчук🛸

@lazarchuck

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

144subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491284716
TypeChannel
Username@lazarchuck
DescriptionТрансляция сообщества в жж и вк. Старый чат https://t.me/turborealism
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lazarchuck

Growth

1447 Aug 2026, 16:19 — 144 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 144 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:198 Aug 2026, 21:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:17144no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:19144first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.8%
avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (9 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total839
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
631
Videos
20
Links
1,990

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2253.7%
🔥1024.4%
512.2%
😱24.88%
👏12.44%
😁12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: Давайте, други милые, буянить и шалить. Над каждою могилою не будем слезы лить. Беду-судьбу лохматую устанем проклинать И жизнь свою сломатую не станем поминать. Мильонов мы не нажили, до звезд не добрались. Но взяли и отважились, сошлись и собрались. А значит продолжаются веселые года, И где-то разгорается далекая звезда, Закутана, замотана туманами потерь... Когда еще взойдет она! Но ты, товари

2👍2

7 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: - ...Но ничего не сказал франкистам отважный республиканский лётчик, только повторял своё имя - Хулио Тибенада... Это реальный анекдот из конца 30-х, дед рассказал. Тогда в их лагерь законопатили несколько "испанцев", от них он и слышал. Сцуко. Дед, в отличие от многих молчаливых ветеранов, довольно много рассказывал и про дореволюционную жизнь, и про гражданскую, и про лагеря, и про Отечественную

👍5

29 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: в аду для перфекционистов ни серы нету ни огня и лишь слегка несимметрично стоят щербатые котлы в раю для перфекцонистов в достатке сера и смола блестят котлы из нержавейки и пламя ровное гудит

26 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC139 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: О граммар-наци и плохом знании матчасти: Напишет кто-нибудь "попал как кур во щи", и тут же набегают знающие люди с повязками и наганами: "Правильно писать "в ощип"!" "Почему правильно?" - "А из кур щей не варят!" Вообще-то варят. Но в этом случае разговор уходит в область кулинарии, где спорщики явно не сильны. Теперь смотрим. В классике встречаются три варианта: Во щи В ощип Во щип (щип - это т

1🔥1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: Попытайтесь угадать, что на этом фото. Кто уже знает, тот молчит

20 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC122 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: 90 лет

👍2🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: #Интернет_магазин_Окей, вы бессовестные твари. Заказ не доставлен, трубку на горячей линии не берут, по почте ответили весьма издевательски и замолчали. Наихудшая обратная связь из всех магазинов, с которыми мне приходилось иметь дело

😱2

9 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC165 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: Журналист: - Вы будете готовы вводить бесполётную зону? Трамп: - Ээ... если надо, то да, но смотрите, я имею в виду, смотрите, я вам говорю, когда у нас будет сделка, мы будем иметь сделку, будут гарантии безопасности и или не будет гарантий безопасности. Я думаю, если мы придём к решению, а я думаю что да, то мы получим сделку, сейчас мы хотим увериться в сделке. Некоторые не думают, что она реал

👍4

29 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTC170 viewsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: Один наш доктор пытался ввести забавный обычай Родился у него первый ребёнок - помер Андропов. Родился второй - помер Черненко. Все говорили: ну теперь если что, раскрутим НН на третьего. Однако второй ребёнок рос болезненным, требовал много внимания, и на третьего НН не решился. Вот так и распался Советский Союз

20 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC208 viewsread 8 August 2026

✏️ Андрей Лазарчук: А посоветуйте что почитать такого лёгкого, ненапряжного?

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lazarchuck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lazarchuk_ru- Лазарчук🛸” (@lazarchuck), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazarchuck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.