Channel
@matanaliz_kofman
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
3,577subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001716975550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @matanaliz_kofman |
| Created | 1 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/matanaliz_kofman |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 3,577 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 3,588 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 3,585 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 3,589 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 3,604 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 3,597 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 3,596 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 3,595 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 3,593 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 3,595 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 3,591 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 3,589 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 3,594 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,593 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:29 | 3,593 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
540 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 245 | 45.4% | |
| ❤ | 105 | 19.4% | |
| 😁 | 63 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 9.81% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 4.81% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 3.70% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 3.15% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.48% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.185% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 548 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Гостем подкаста «Кино для чайников» стал председатель Общественной палаты ДНР, председатель Донецкой республиканской писательской организации ООО «Союз писателей России», учредитель фестиваля «Звезды над Донбассом» Александр Кофман. Ждем эфир на канале авторов подкаста Алексея Гравицкого и Андрея Мармонтова «Кино для чайников».
❤6👍3👎1
Ну, понеслась!
🔥7👎1
Окей, пока нет электричества, давайте разберемся с «Жуком» из фильма «Малыш», раз он всех так пугает. На мой взгляд, актер отыгрывает не совсем то, что нужно, поэтому «Жук» его скорее киношный, чем настоящий офицер со свистящей флягой, но тем, кто с подобными людьми не взаимодействовал, трудно понять, что именно нужно играть. Кто такой «Жук»? Скорее всего, это не уголовник, а мент. В ополчение пошел еще молодым опе…
👍23😢7🔥5❤2👎1
Соглашусь целиком и полностью. Получился прекрасный, добрый фильм. Рекомендую к семейному посещению кинотеатров.
👍10❤4👎1
Два Кофмана. Один из них - Иван Агапов (инженер Кофман (Пин) в фильме) #Смешарики_Сквозь_вселенные
❤24👏10👎1
Как же учредителю фестиваля «Звёзды над Донбассом» Александру Кофману было не посетить предпремьерный показ фильма «Смешарики сквозь вселенные» в московском кинотеатре «Октябрь»? Тем более что режиссёр картины — Андрей Мармонтов, сценарист — Сергей Лукьяненко, а одним из героев фильма стал инженер Кофман! Встречаем новую космическую историю любимых героев — яркую, добрую и по-настоящему звёздную.
❤22👎1
Кофман закроет вас в багажном отделении до конца полета (с) Зараааааааазы ;))))))))) #Смешарики_Сквозь_вселенные
❤8😁6🔥5👎1
Не бойтесь, это работа самого инженера Кофмана. Захотите - не сломаете. (С) Серега, Андрей, спасибо вам. Аж расплакался ;)))))) #Смешарики_Сквозь_вселенные
🔥24❤9👎1
Ну как Кофман мог не посетить предпоказ, где есть Пин Кофман ;)))))))
👍16😁6👎1
#МатаналиZ_недели Мир продолжает уверенно двигаться к светлому будущему, теперь увидев его на дне пропасти. Главной российской новостью недели стал теракт в центре Москвы. Хохлотеррористы в очередной раз напомнили, что для них не существует ни фронта, ни правил, ни мирных людей. Зато после каждого такого преступления обязательно находится десяток интернет-экспертов, которые уже через пять минут знают, кто виноват, …
👍22👎3😢1
Пользуясь своим положением, прочитал первую часть книги Александра Кофмана "Я - Тесей". Избегая спойлеров не побоюсь сказать, что народу не нужна нездоровая Эллада. Народу нужна здоровая Эллада. Это я намекаю на то, о чем не думал (по его утверждениям) Александр когда писал: очередную попытку переосмыслить историю и мифологию античности, а также переделить её наследие. Поэтому читайте! Но сразу предупреждаю, что это…
👍23😁5❤2👎2
Тот самый случай, когда криворукость исполнителей должна повлечь за собой серьёзнейшие кадровые решения. На сайте Министерства юстиции РФ уже больше суток в открытом доступе находится пропагандистская лента Третьего рейха, созданная для оккупированных Германией советских территорий. В ней рассказывается о том, как «Гитлер несёт свободу порабощённым народам Советского Союза». Лента так и называется — «Гитлер-освободит…
👍30🔥6😁5🤯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @matanaliz_kofman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Alexander Kofman |
|---|---|
| Description | Ukrainian economist |
| X / Twitter | @kofman_alex |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“А.Кофман. МатАналиZ” (@matanaliz_kofman), 3,577 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matanaliz_kofman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.