عندمَا اتيت ودار حدِيث بَيننا اردكت بَأني سَأحبك دائماً لأن هناك شيئاً مَا بَك يَختلف عن الجمِيع شعرت بَسعادة لم أشعر بَها مَن قبل .

Channel
- رغَبَة .
@rrqeaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,421subscribers
-361 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001972920297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rrqeaa |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rrqeaa |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 14,421 | -97 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 14,518 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 14,541 | -23 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 14,564 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 14,580 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 14,596 | -34 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 14,630 | -35 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 14,665 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 14,688 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 14,700 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 14,717 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 14,730 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 14,748 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 14,760 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 14,773 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 14,771 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 14,774 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 14,772 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 14,774 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 14,778 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rrqeaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 October 2025 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
أين مَوطِني ومَرسَاي أين تَهدأ سُفُني ؟
كُل ما أفعَلهُ هذِهِ الأيام هوَ أنَّني أحرسُ قَلبي مِن اليَأسِ .
𝑩𝒂𝒃𝒚 𝑴𝒊𝒔𝒌 🧸
كُل شيء مُبَعثَر ، وأنا ؟ أنا هُنا أناجيكَ بِقلبٍ تائه فَلا تَترُكَني وأنظر إلى حالي وَتَلطف بأمري يآرب .
ما اشتدَّ ضيقٌ إلا قرَّب اللهُ فرجهُ .
رجوتُ كريمًا قد وثقتُ بصُنعهِ وماكانَ مَن يرجو الكريمَ يخيبُ .
Photo, posted without a caption
مُطر ورمضان والعشر الأواخر وربٌ مُجيب 🥹.
مُحمَلاً بأيامٍ لا تُشبُهني .
اللهُـم أذقنا حَلاوة جبرِ الخاطر 🤲🏻.
أَتمنى مِن الله أن يكونوا ثلاثينَ ليلةً مِن رمضان جبرًا لنا ولأروحِنا .
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @rrqeaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ee_ka · 45,003
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@llA0lI · 56,069
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@A2llm1 · 44,971
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@ERT8l · 130,197
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Narla2 · 70,704
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@M1140 · 99,853
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@T_16_7 · 49,361
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@Hsoi1 · 177,798
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
@IIU4F · 68,961
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@hayaa_0 · 73,064
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@MOOQQ55 · 77,378
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@Geoooom · 71,843
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@smr120h · 104,756
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@cf67c · 43,470
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@IIU4T · 75,260
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@UIOIU0 · 104,624
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@OOIIIEEE · 56,077
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@Majaraat · 59,173
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@nr0lll · 81,406
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@RRR9_0 · 44,125
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
@MAi3i · 58,693
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@Diilen · 114,012
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@vc6Il · 134,037
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@IATIIUI5 · 55,924
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- رغَبَة .” (@rrqeaa), 14,421 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrqeaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.