Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مكان دافيء

Channel

مكان دافيء

@P_E_68

Not marked by Telegram, checked 9 August 20262 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,539subscribers

+4,312 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002162161503
TypeChannel
Usernames@P_E_6 @P_E_68
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/P_E_68

Growth

122,59111,2968 August 2026 — 17,227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,224 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,188 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,170 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,096 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,821 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,591 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,391 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,300 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,217 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,158 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,096 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,027 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,942 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,847 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,631 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,631 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,625 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,590 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,539 subscribers21,5398 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net +4,312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 04:0521,539-51
29 Aug 2026, 03:5321,590-35
28 Aug 2026, 03:3421,625-6
27 Aug 2026, 23:3021,631no change
27 Aug 2026, 23:1521,631+21,630
25 Aug 2026, 11:131-21,846
24 Aug 2026, 14:4721,847-95
22 Aug 2026, 23:5521,942-85
21 Aug 2026, 12:1522,027-69
20 Aug 2026, 12:1222,096-62
19 Aug 2026, 12:4522,158-59
18 Aug 2026, 14:1222,217-83
17 Aug 2026, 17:2622,300-91
16 Aug 2026, 15:2222,391-200
14 Aug 2026, 23:1422,591+4,770
13 Aug 2026, 13:1817,821+725
12 Aug 2026, 11:0617,096-37
11 Aug 2026, 12:3717,133-37
10 Aug 2026, 15:2117,170-18
9 Aug 2026, 15:1617,188first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 21,539 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held47 (8 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total94,892
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 47 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @P_E_68. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC209 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Spin the wheel and claim Telegram gifts on Virus 🎁 https://t.me/virus_play_bot/app?startapp=adSegmentCode=freespininlineshare3

27 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC396 viewsread 27 August 2026

بوت روليت توفر لك الفرصة للفوز هدايا مجانية

27 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC407 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

No way, I scored some pricey Telegram NFT gifts off a Virus 😳 https://t.me/virus_play_bot/app?startapp=openRouletteMain_inviteCodejZyyEeKOJwNBNYai_adSegmentCode=freespininlineshare44

24 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC819 viewsread 27 August 2026

اگدر بالضوة بس ما رهم وياك على گد الشمس ملگاك فصلتة

24 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC829 viewsread 27 August 2026

حبني خليني استِچن بِفياي عينك أرد أعيش بدِنيا خَضّره حبني خلٍ اتهنة مرة .

20 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 27 August 2026

واضحَك لليَشبهك وأصفُن شگد بيّ حتى ألبيّ شَبه مِنك ولا ينمَل .

20 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 27 August 2026

عيَوني بيهن شُوگ يرهَم بس عليك .

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @P_E_68. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 155,445 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ސاމ ᯓ
@NINNNlll · 44,936
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 August 2026
ᓭི༏ᓯྀ عبارات اقتباسات ستوريات
@NlNNN · 2,079,079
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
شبكة أبن الغربية ألتعليمية
@ET_ETu · 236,935
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مكان دافيء” (@P_E_68), 21,539 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/P_E_68.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.