Channel
@oxana_iz_urana
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
361subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002137181675 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oxana_iz_urana |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oxana_iz_urana |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 361 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 365 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 368 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 372 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 375 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 377 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 377 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
175 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 53 | 30.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5402616568246969654 | 21 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5404651914593836721 | 21 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5404397403421812660 | 18 | 10.3% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 8.00% | |
| 🤗 | 9 | 5.14% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 4.57% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.71% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.71% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
канал для друзей с фоточками из поездок ) архивы, текущее, впечатления, красоты, рекомендации 🎙️ https://t.me/oxana_iz_urana_trip для моих трех друзей, кто нажал «подпишусь» в опросе выше 😃
❤🔥5
Posted without readable text
❤🔥3custom 54043974034218126601
считаю себя гением ) мб мне на поток поставить работу в нейронках?)
custom 54026165682469696545🔥4🤗1🥴1
ко мне пришли боты рекламировать капли для глаз 😂🙈
🤣4
что интереснее? ) с чего начать свои рассказы?
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥2❤🔥1custom 54026165682469696541
я сейчас много работаю, в жизни появилась дисциплина и пропало распиздяйство могу даже сказать, я еще никогда в жизни не была так загружена работой, а самое прикольное — я кайфую от этого (три проекта на смм, четвертый это я пишу внештатно для регионального сми, пятый проект это мое рукоделие, но пока подзабила) я делаю много для себя нового, то, что раньше не получалось — сейчас меня за это хвалят
🔥5custom 54043974034218126605custom 54026165682469696543❤🔥1custom 54046519145938367211
🎙️ рассказываю про три залетных рилса за эту неделю, о чем они и как так вышло это скорее дружеский контент, если вы ждете «волшебной таблетки», ее там нет)
🔥4custom 54026165682469696544custom 54046519145938367212
обновление инфо мой личный рилс залетел на 50к сегодня (я его спрятала), рилс клиента 30к, другого клиента 15к записать голосовое с моим мнением про такие полеты-залеты?
🔥7custom 54046519145938367216💔1
сука клиника где можно взять сперму дурова уже добавила сноску что он террорист
🤣6
Террористы во всех странах мира: религиозные фанатики, убийцы, подрывники Террорист в России: не удалил Дайвинчик
🤣4
ну что, Павел Дуров теперь экстремист из-за бота для знакомств дайвинчик 😳 теперь точно телегу разбанят, ога
💔3🥴2
танцую на улицах города, когда у меня хорошее настроение 😀
🔥11🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oxana_iz_urana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
что интереснее? ) с чего начать свои рассказы?
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📌 Оксана ✨ из SMM урана✨ продвижение упаковка телеграм” (@oxana_iz_urana), 361 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oxana_iz_urana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.