Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,359–22,670 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:19
22,395
-12
16 Sept 2026, 16:55
22,407
-15
14 Sept 2026, 18:59
22,422
+5
13 Sept 2026, 04:38
22,417
-9
11 Sept 2026, 08:57
22,426
-20
8 Sept 2026, 12:17
22,446
+2
5 Sept 2026, 08:02
22,444
-24
3 Sept 2026, 13:35
22,468
-5
2 Sept 2026, 10:23
22,473
-6
1 Sept 2026, 12:09
22,479
-10
31 Aug 2026, 08:32
22,489
-16
30 Aug 2026, 05:13
22,505
-9
29 Aug 2026, 07:04
22,514
-12
28 Aug 2026, 05:28
22,526
-6
27 Aug 2026, 03:13
22,532
-6
26 Aug 2026, 03:59
22,538
-8
25 Aug 2026, 03:05
22,546
-13
23 Aug 2026, 16:12
22,559
+12
20 Aug 2026, 17:33
22,547
-8
19 Aug 2026, 14:42
22,555
first reading
Engagement
290 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.96%
avg views ÷ 22,395 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.874%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 290 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
290 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
88,774
Reactions total
713
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10h 53m
Average length
6m 36s
Measured directly from 99 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,758 reactions across 234 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
816
46.4%
💩
383
21.8%
🔥
246
14.0%
🤯
114
6.48%
🤡
76
4.32%
🤣
74
4.21%
😢
49
2.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 239 of the 290 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,758 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 290 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️ Kevin Roberts, Präsident der Heritage Foundation, sprach beim der World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2024 in Davos auf einem Panel zu den Erwartungen einer möglichen republikanischen Administration und konfrontierte die dort versammelte „WEF-Elite“ mit ungeschminkten Aussagen zu mehreren drängenden Themen.
Er erklärte sinngemäß:
„Sie sind ein Teil des Problems. Die politischen Eliten erzählen dem Durchschnittsv…
Wie hängt das Geldsystem mit dem Great Reset zusammen?
Eine der wenigen Sendungen des Staatsfernsehens. Dirk Müller erklärt den grundlegenden Fehler des Zinseszins-Systems und zeigt, weshalb es zu Crash und Enteignungen kommen muss. Glücklich das System, das die vermeintliche Schuld am "Reset" einem Virus oder einem Krieg in die Schuhe schieben kann.
(ZDF Sendung "Markus Lanz" vom 27.09.2011)
📣 Jetzt Kostenlos ab…
RFK Jr. hat in seinen jüngsten Äußerungen dargelegt, wie BlackRock, Vanguard und State Street als eine einzige Unternehmenshydra agieren.
Sie besitzen bereits rund 89 % des S&P 500 und kaufen in rasender Geschwindigkeit amerikanische Einfamilienhäuser, um bis 2030 rund 60 % des Marktes zu kontrollieren.
Ziel dieser Strategie ist der „Great Reset“ des Weltwirtschaftsforums (WEF), wie er in den offiziellen Dokumenten…
Nicole Shanahan - ehemalige Ehefrau von Google-Co-Founder Sergey Brin & ehemalige Running-Mate von Robert F. Kennedy Jr, hat sich als Whistleblowerin zu Wort gemeldet und die gesamte „Tech-Wife-Mafia“ des Silicon Valley enttarnt.
Sie war zudem persönliche Unterzeichnerin mehrerer neunstelliger Spendenschecks.
Sie wirft dieser Gruppe vor, systematisch als Werkzeuge für das von Klaus Schwab als „Great Reset“ bezeichn…
Worauf unser Geldsystem aufbaut und warum die Banken dabei immer nur die Gewinner sind
Henry Ford, ein bedeutender US-Industrieller, äußerte sich einmal zu dem Thema Geldsystem mit den Worten: „Wenn die Menschen das Geldsystem verstehen würden, hätten wir vor morgen früh die Revolution.“
Er wollte damit zum Ausdruck bringen, dass das Geldsystem des 20. Jahrhunderts so komplex und undurchsichtig ist, dass die breite…
1912: Die Titanic sinkt
Auf dem Schiff:
• John Jacob Astor IV
• Benjamin Guggenheim
• Isidor Straus
Alle reich & alle Gegner des Zentralbanksystems.
J.P. Morgan gehörte das Schiff. Er hat in der letzten Sekunde storniert. Die anderen nicht.
Der Widerstand versank im Meer. Ihr Plan ging auf…
1913 – Zentralbank
1913 – IRS (Einkommenssteuer)
1913 – Rockefeller Stiftung
1913 – American Cancer Society
1913 – Anti-Dif…
Die Regierungen anderer Leute stürzen
Fälle, in denen die Vereinigten Staaten seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg eine ausländische Regierung stürzten oder zu stürzen versuchten. (* steht für den erfolgreichen Sturz einer Regierung)
🇨🇳 China 1949 bis Anfang der 1960er Jahre
🇦🇱 Albanien 1949-53
🇩🇪 Ostdeutschland 1950er Jahre
🇮🇷 Iran 1953 *
🇬🇹 Guatemala 1954 *
🇨🇷 Costa Rica Mitte der 1950er Jahre
🇸🇾 Syrien 1956-7
🇪🇬 Ägypten 1…
Die wahren Herrscher der Welt: Eine Enthüllung der globalen Machtstrukturen
Hier eine klare, einfache Erklärung zu jedem – bleib dran, es passt alles zusammen wie ein Puzzle:
BIS (Bank für Internationalen Zahlungsausgleich)
Die BIS in Basel ist die Zentralbank der Zentralbanken – der Boss über FED, EZB und Co. Gegründet 1930, offiziell zur Abwicklung deutscher Reparationszahlungen nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Aber …
‼️ John Perkins, ehemaliger US-Geheimdienstagent und Whistleblower, beschreibt in seinen Büchern, wie die internationale Finanzelite im vergangenen Jahrhundert ein unsichtbares globales Imperium errichtet hat.
Dieses System hat durch gezielte Maßnahmen wie Verschuldung und politische Einflussnahme unzählige Länder in Abhängigkeit und Armut gestürzt. Perkins zeigt auf, wie sogenannte „Wirtschaftskiller“ – Experten fü…
„Quantencomputer knackt Bitcoin" – wer verdient an dieser Schlagzeile?
Du hast sie bestimmt gesehen. Die Schlagzeile: „Quantencomputer bedrohen Bitcoin."
Klingt nach Weltuntergang.
Ich weiß, wie sich das anfühlt. Kaum überlegst du, dich mit Bitcoin zu beschäftigen, ruft jemand: „Zu spät, bald ist eh alles geknackt!"
Mir ging es genauso.
Dann habe ich die Originalzahlen gelesen. Und die erzählen eine ganz andere G…
BRICS und das World Economic Forum
Die BRICS-Staaten, die um Ägypten, Äthiopien, Iran, Saudi-Arabien und die Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate erweitert wurden, läuten das Ende der globalen US-Dominanz, und für den Dollar der Todesstoß und damit die Öffnung zu einer multipolaren Welt ein. So hieß es.
Angesichts der Euphorie, die auch von zahlreichen alternativen Medien mitgetragen wird, hier ein Blick auf einige Zusam…
Wie man den Great Reset/Agenda2030 erfolgreich ablehnt
Versuche, so viele Punkte wie möglich zu erfüllen:
🔴 Bewirtschafte Land (Agroforstwirtschaft und Permakultur). Verbessere den Boden deines Landes.
🔴 Bestehe auf deine Privatsphäre (schau dir Linux und CalyxOS an).
🔴 Zahle mit Bargeld, vermeide Bonusprogramme.
🔴 Ziehe Heimunterricht in Betracht, um zu vermeiden, dass die Kinder einer Gehirnwäsche unterzogen werd…
Signed Chris 🇹🇷
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @unabhaengig_neutral. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Was bedeutete das Kriegsende in Europa 1945 wirklich?
Das Ende der NS Zeit5%
Der gelungene Regime Change durch Briten, Franzosen, Amerikaner95%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 290 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@unabhaengig_neutral named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@unn_neu named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Afd Alternative für Deutschland Best Of @BestOfAFD · 7,581#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr. Michael Nehls @MichaelNehls · 32,002 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Ostnews Faktencheck @ostnews_faktencheck · 42,640 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_de @ukr_leaks_de · 32,518 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
Sören Schumann - Gesundheit Ganzheitlich @soeren_schumann · 59,900 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
Politische Nachrichten 🗞 @Politische_Nachrichten · 27,945 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
MEINE D-NEWS 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭 @MeineDNEWS · 55,820 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Multipolar Magazin @multipolar_magazin · 22,894 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Node of Time DE @node_of_time_DE · 39,219 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Satellit @satellit_de · 61,274 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Analytik & News @analytik_news · 34,882 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
AUFWACHKANAL ❗️ deine rote Pille @Aufwachkanal_deine_rote_Pille · 83,385 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Klartext20/21-Gemeinsam 👍🏻Info-kanal🔝🖤🤍❤️ @Klartext2021Gemeinsam · 64,143 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNN - Unabhängig-Neutrale Nachrichten” (@unabhaengig_neutral), 22,395 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unabhaengig_neutral.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.