Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,934. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111,922–114,436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 02:41
112,212
-258
18 Sept 2026, 17:55
112,470
-108
16 Sept 2026, 09:15
112,578
-76
14 Sept 2026, 15:56
112,654
-71
12 Sept 2026, 23:16
112,725
-80
10 Sept 2026, 22:18
112,805
-89
7 Sept 2026, 20:57
112,894
-124
4 Sept 2026, 16:59
113,018
-53
3 Sept 2026, 05:54
113,071
-41
1 Sept 2026, 21:45
113,112
-73
31 Aug 2026, 19:18
113,185
-59
30 Aug 2026, 18:47
113,244
-51
29 Aug 2026, 17:48
113,295
-32
28 Aug 2026, 17:44
113,327
-31
27 Aug 2026, 17:05
113,358
-51
26 Aug 2026, 19:02
113,409
-42
25 Aug 2026, 21:13
113,451
-38
24 Aug 2026, 20:02
113,489
-53
23 Aug 2026, 05:58
113,542
-35
21 Aug 2026, 20:16
113,577
first reading
Engagement
215 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.32%
avg views ÷ 112,212 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,220
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.519%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 215 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
215 (29 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
1,010,640
Reactions total
5,247
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 23:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈821
Videos
≈170
Links
≈2,690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
44m 07s
Average length
1m 46s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36,728 reactions across 212 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
8,876
24.2%
💯
7,860
21.4%
🥰
6,864
18.7%
❤🔥
5,988
16.3%
🤩
5,879
16.0%
🙏
636
1.73%
👏
284
0.773%
🤣
137
0.373%
👌
121
0.329%
⚡
75
0.204%
😁
8
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,979 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
32
of 215 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HolistischeGesundheitHeilung. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 215 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧈 Wusstest du, dass „Margarine“ eigentlich „Perle“ heißt?
Der Name kommt vom griechischen Wort „margaron“, Perle, weil das Fett beim Erfinden so perlmuttartig glänzte. Heute steht sie in fast jedem Kühlschrank, und trotzdem hält sich ihr Ruf als billige Kopie hartnäckig.
Professor Flecky schaut genauer hin: Wann ist Butter die bessere Wahl, wann die Margarine, und warum brauchst du zum Braten eigentlich etwas ganz …
PREMIERE: Unser erster eigener Kongress 🐝
ARTHROSE-KONGRESS · 9. BIS 16.10. · KOSTENLOS ›
„Da kann man nichts machen, das ist eben Verschleiß.“
Diesen Satz höre ich immer wieder.
Im Sprechzimmer, am Küchentisch, im Verein.
Und danach kommt meistens nichts mehr.
Abwarten, Schmerzmittel, irgendwann die Frage nach einer OP.
Ich glaube, da geht mehr.
Deshalb habe ich 25 Expertinnen und Experteneingeladen und daraus u…
„𝕾𝖔𝖇𝖆𝖑𝖉 𝖉𝖎𝖊 𝕷𝖊𝖍𝖗𝖊𝖗 𝖆𝖓𝖋𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖓, 𝖎𝖍𝖓 𝖜𝖎𝖊 𝖊𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖓 𝖌𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓 𝕾𝖈𝖍ü𝖑𝖊𝖗 𝖟𝖚 𝖇𝖊𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖊𝖑𝖓, 𝖜𝖚𝖗𝖉𝖊 𝖊𝖗 𝖜𝖎𝖗𝖐𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍 𝖊𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖗.
𝕯𝖆𝖒𝖎𝖙 𝕸𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖓 𝖚𝖓𝖘𝖊𝖗 𝖁𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖗𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖓 𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖉𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖊𝖓, 𝖒ü𝖘𝖘𝖊𝖓 𝖜𝖎𝖗 𝖊𝖘 𝖎𝖍𝖓𝖊𝖓 𝖟𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖙 𝖌𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓."
Marcel Pagnol
Wenn also unser Blick allein etwas in der Reise eines Schülers so dramatisch verändern kann, muss SCHULE, wie sie heute existiert, grundlegend verändert werden!
https://t.me/simonevoss
‼️Nicht jeder versteht, warum du still geworden bist
Hallo,
jeder Selbstdenker kennt es. Du schaust dabei zu.
💊 Deine Mutter schluckt jeden Tag ihre Blutdrucktabletten, ihre Cholesterin-Pillen, ihre Schmerzmittel gegen den Rücken.
🍕 Dein Vater greift zum Fertiggericht aus der Mikrowelle. Zur Cola zum Essen. Zur Chipstüte abends vor dem Fernseher.
📺 Dein Partner schaltet die Tagesschau ein, holt sich eine Cola Lig…
🌊 Warum zerlegen wir die Natur eigentlich ständig in Einzelstoffe, obwohl sie selbst ganz anders funktioniert?
Als Naturstoffforscherin beschäftigt mich diese Frage seit vielen Jahren.
Im Meer, in Pflanzen, Kräutern und Pilzen finden wir keine isolierten Einzelstoffe.
Wir finden Vielfalt, komplexe natürliche Matrices und unzählige Beziehungen.
Genau darum geht es in diesem kleinen Video: um meine Faszination für A…
Arthrose in den Fingern: Welche Symptome sind typisch?
Knoten, Schmerzen, steife Finger am Morgen: woran man Arthrose in den Fingern erkennt, wann Rheuma dahinterstecken kann und was wirklich hilft.
Neulich war ich bei meiner Mutter zu Besuch.Es war einer dieser Morgen, an denen ihre Finger angeschwollen sind, sich kaum bewegen lassen und wehtun. Sie hielt die Kaffeetasse mit beiden Händen, ganz vorsichtig.
Das ko…
Ich weiß warum ich Katzen so mag😊
Ich kann da nur von mir sprechen
Ich mag das Schnurren der Katzen, ob die mich heilen?
Keine Ahnung aber beruhigen tut es mich schon. ❤️
💃 Anzeige memonizerBODY classic – jetzt mit zwei Wechselbändern geschenkt.
Mehr Balance im Alltag – diesen Gedanken bringt memon mit dem memonizerBODY classic direkt ans Handgelenk. Ein Armband, das dich durch deinen Tag begleitet und sich mit wechselbaren Farben deinem Stil anpasst.
Die bioenergetische Technologie soll laut memon ein harmonisches Umfeld fördern und dich im Umgang mit den Einflüssen moderner Techn…
🧠 Anzeige - D-Galactose, der Zucker, der am Insulin vorbei in die Gehirnzellen gelangt
Sie stehen in der Küche, den Schlüsselbund in der Hand, und suchen im Kopf verzweifelt nach dem, was Sie eigentlich holen wollten. Der Name der Nachbarin liegt Ihnen auf der Zunge und fällt Ihnen erst abends im Bett wieder ein, und am Nachmittag fühlt sich der Kopf an, als hätte ihn jemand in Watte gepackt.
Unser Gehirn lebt von …
Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @HolistischeGesundheitHeilung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@HolistischeGesundheitHeilung edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 73 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 65 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@HolistischeGesundheitHeilung named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@lifehackpower named in 8 posts, 9 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Backup: Dietrich Klinghardt @DietrichKlinghardt · 24,676 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell @silkeschaefer · 121,301 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Catherines Blick @t5mtxr8b · 23,104 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
Multipolar Magazin @multipolar_magazin · 22,894 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
UNN - Unabhängig-Neutrale Nachrichten @unabhaengig_neutral · 22,348 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
LION Media TV @LIONMediaTV · 104,262 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Holistische Gesundheit” (@HolistischeGesundheitHeilung), 112,212 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HolistischeGesundheitHeilung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
